Jewamot 6:5 Odniesienia do Talmudu: Jerusalem Talmud Yevamot, Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot, Jerusalem Talmud Sotah & Jerusalem Talmud Kiddushin

כֹּהֵן הֶדְיוֹט לֹא יִשָּׂא אַיְלוֹנִית, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן יֶשׁ לוֹ אִשָּׁה וּבָנִים. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁיֶּשׁ לוֹ אִשָּׁה וּבָנִים, לֹא יִשָּׂא אַיְלוֹנִית, שֶׁהִיא זוֹנָה הָאֲמוּרָה בַתּוֹרָה. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אֵין זוֹנָה אֶלָּא גִיּוֹרֶת וּמְשֻׁחְרֶרֶת וְשֶׁנִּבְעֲלָה בְעִילַת זְנוּת:

Zwykły Cohein nie może poślubić eilonith (kobiety, która nie może rodzić), chyba że ma żonę i dzieci. [To samo dotyczy Izraelity. „Cohein” pojawia się tylko z powodu sprzeciwu R. Yehudy, który mówi, że Cohein, mimo że ma żonę i dzieci, nie może poślubić eilonitu, w przeciwieństwie do Izraelity. Halacha nie jest zgodna z R. Juda.] R. Juda mówi: Nawet jeśli ma żonę i dzieci, nie może poślubić eilonitu, ponieważ jest ona „strefą”, o której mowa w Torze (Kapłańska 21: 7 ). A mędrcy mówią, że „zonah” jest prozelitą, uwolnioną służącą i kobietą, z którą żyło się bezmyślnie [jak ci, których zakazano przykazaniem negatywnym lub pozytywnym, i, rzecz jasna, odpowiedzialnymi za karę lub sądowa kara śmierci. Ale jeśli ktoś mieszka z niezamężną kobietą, nie czyni jej zonah.]

Jerusalem Talmud Yevamot

Example. The elder Rebbi Hoshaia and Rebbi Judah Neśia were sitting together. Rebbi Joḥanan ran und whispered into Rebbi Hoshaia the elder’s ear: May a Cohen who is injured in his testicles marry the daughter of converts? He156R. Jehudah Neśia. asked him, what did he tell you? He answered, a question which a carpenter, son of carpenters157A Sage, son of Sages., cannot resolve. He did not ask me about a convert, since she is like a whore for him158Mishnah 6:5.. He did not ask about an Israelite daughter, for she will be desecrated159Since he remains a Cohen, he desecrates any woman forbidden to him.. He asked only about the daughter of converts! Is the daughter of converts not an Israel160Mishnah Qiddushin 4:6. If she was conceived after conversion, she is an Israel for everybody except R. Jehudah who excludes descendants of converts from the priesthood on basis of Ez. 44:22. Cf. Bikkurim, Chapter 1, Notes 96, 104.? You have to explain it following Rebbi Jehudah, since Rebbi Jehudah says, the daughter of a male convert has the status of a desecrated male161Since R. Jehudah is not followed in practice, R. Joḥanan’s question is answered in the negative even by a minor capacity such as R. Jehudah Neśia..
Zapytaj rabinaBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot

Did they disagree that a virgin who had sexual relations with an underage boy160This is a problem only for R. Eleazar who holds (Yebamot 6:5, Note 108; 7:5, Note 105; 13:1, Note 14) that sexual relations between unmarried partners are always harlotry which bars the female from marrying a priest. For all other authorities, there would only be a problem regarding the High Priest who may marry only a virgin. or with someone who is not a man161Sexual relations of a woman with an animal is a capital crime if initiated by the woman. But it has no influence on her marital status. is enabled for the priesthood? Rebbi Ḥalaphta ben Shaul said, she is enabled even for the High Priest162In the Babli, Yebamot 59b, this is an Amoraic statement by Samuel..
Zapytaj rabinaBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Sotah

MISHNAH: Everybody agrees that he may not stipulate with her about before she was preliminarily married or about after she was divorced202He cannot ask her to swear that she did not have any intercourse while not being married to him.. If she was secluded after that203After the divorce. Deut. 24:2–4 prohibits the first husband from remarrying his divorcee if she had married another man after her divorce (Deut. 24:2: “She went and became another’s [wife]”.) Remarrying a wife who was promiscuous after divorce but not otherwise married is not forbidden., became impure204Unmarried intercourse is punishable as harlotry according to some authorities (Yebamot 6:5, Note 107; Babli Yebamot 61b; Sifra Emor Pereq 1)., and after that he took her back, he cannot stipulate with her. This is the rule: He cannot stipulate about any intercourse she could have had and would not be forbidden to him181Mishnah 7. R. Abba bar Mamal is correct in the tradition of R. Eleazar. For him, only R. Aqiba could let the levir include a question about the time between the first husband’s death and his marriage..
Zapytaj rabinaBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Kiddushin

Dostępne tylko dla członków Premium