Talmud sobre Yevamot 7:1

אַלְמָנָה לְכֹהֵן גָּדוֹל, גְּרוּשָׁה וַחֲלוּצָה לְכֹהֵן הֶדְיוֹט, הִכְנִיסָה לוֹ עַבְדֵי מְלוֹג וְעַבְדֵי צֹאן בַּרְזֶל, עַבְדֵי מְלוֹג לֹא יֹאכְלוּ בַתְּרוּמָה, עַבְדֵי צֹאן בַּרְזֶל יֹאכֵלוּ. וְאֵלּוּ הֵן עַבְדֵי מְלוֹג, אִם מֵתוּ, מֵתוּ לָהּ, וְאִם הוֹתִירוּ, הוֹתִירוּ לָהּ. אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁהוּא חַיָּב בִּמְזוֹנוֹתָן, הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ לֹא יֹאכְלוּ בַתְּרוּמָה. וְאֵלּוּ הֵן עַבְדֵי צֹאן בַּרְזֶל, אִם מֵתוּ, מֵתוּ לוֹ, וְאִם הוֹתִירוּ, הוֹתִירוּ לוֹ. הוֹאִיל וְהוּא חַיָּב בְּאַחֲרָיוּתָן, הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ יֹאכְלוּ בַתְּרוּמָה:

Uma viúva para um sumo sacerdote, um divorciado ou uma chalutzah para um padre regular —se ela trouxesse para ele escravos melog [O que a mulher deixa para si mesma e não escreve em seu kethubah é chamado "nichsei melog" ("propriedade de arrancar"), pois o marido "os arranca", como as galinhas são arrancadas. Pois ele come os frutos dessa propriedade e, se eles diminuem (em valor), diminuem para ela; e se aumentam, aumentam para ela] e os escravos de tzon-barzel [Nichsei tzon-barzel é a propriedade que ela traz para ele e que está escrita na ketubah: "É isso que eu (o marido) prometo o quethubah ". É chamado "tzon-barzel", pois o diretor permanece como "ferro". Pois se todos eles morrem, o marido deve fazer restituição. E como costumavam contar as ovelhas (tzon) assim, e o pastor era responsabilizado por elas, mesmo que todas morressem, a propriedade pela qual o marido assumia a responsabilidade era chamada "nichsei tzon barzel".]—os escravos melog não comem terumah [porque são dela, e ela é uma chalalah], e os escravos tzon-barzel comem. E estes são escravos de melogue: se eles morrem, morrem para ela; e se aumentam, aumentam para ela. Embora ele (o marido) seja obrigado a alimentá-los, eles não comem terumah. E estes são escravos de Tzon-Barzel: se eles morrem, morrem para ele; e se aumentam, aumentam para ele. Uma vez que ele deve restituir (se estiverem perdidos), eles comem terumah.

Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim

There, we have stated: ¹⁴³This paragraph is from Giṭtin 4:4 where the few differences in spelling are noted and which is explained there in Notes 75–78, 120–130.“A slave whom his master gave as mortgage¹⁴⁴Greek ὑποθήκη. to others and then freed him [in strict law does not owe anything, but for the public good one forces the master to formally manumit him and he writes a bond for his own value. Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel says, only the one who manumits writes.] Who frees? Rav says, either his first or his second master. Rebbi Joḥanan says, only his first master alone is able to free. Rebbi Haggai objected before Rebbi Yose: Does not a baraita disagree with Rav? If a Jew gave a loan to a Gentile on the latter’s leavened matter, it is permitted after Passover. If you say that the Jew has property rights in it, it would be forbidden. What does Rav do with this? Rebbi Yudan said, manumission is made easy, as it was stated: If somebody gives his slave as mortgage¹⁴⁴Greek ὑποθήκη., if he sold him, he is not sold; if he freed him, he is freed. The strength of Rebbi Joḥanan is from the following: Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel says, only the manumittor writes. If somebody mortgaged his field to another, then went and sold it, can the creditor not come and foreclose? Rebbi Abbahu said, in this matter Rebbi Joḥanan opened for us a door to illuminate. We do not find that a slave can again be enslaved after having been freed. If that is so, he should not have to write a bond for his value! Rebbi Ila said, it is better that a person say to him, give me the 200 zuz which you owe me than say to him, you are my slave! The rabbis of Caesarea say in Rebbi Nasaʹs name: Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel follows Rebbi Meïr. Just as Rebbi Meïr imposes a fine for words, so Rabban Simeon ben Gamliel imposes a fine for words. As it was stated: With a bond documenting both principal and interest one can collect neither principal nor interest, the words of Rebbi Meïr. But the Sages say, one collects the principal but not the interest.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Capítulo completo Próximo versículo