בַּת יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁנִּסֵּת לְכֹהֵן וְהִכְנִיסָה לוֹ עֲבָדִים, בֵּין עַבְדֵי מְלוֹג, בֵּין עַבְדֵי צֹאן בַּרְזֶל, הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ יֹאכְלוּ בַתְּרוּמָה. וּבַת כֹּהֵן שֶׁנִּסֵּת לְיִשְׂרָאֵל, וְהִכְנִיסָה לוֹ, בֵּין עַבְדֵי מְלוֹג, בֵּין עַבְדֵי צֹאן בַּרְזֶל, הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ לֹא יֹאכְלוּ בַתְּרוּמָה:
Se a filha de um israelita se casou com um Cohein e ele morreu, deixando-a grávida, seus servos não comem terumah por causa da porção do feto (nos servos). [Embora ela tenha filhos dele e coma terumah, seus servos tzon-barzel não comem terumah; porque eles pertencem aos herdeiros, e o feto tem uma porção neles, e o feto não tem poder para fazê-los comer terumah—ou porque ele sustenta que um feto no ventre de um estranho (para o sacerdócio), (ie, um israelita) é um estranho, ou porque ele sustenta que aquele que nasce faz com que outros comam; quem ainda não nasceu não come, como está escrito (Levítico 22:11): "E aquele que nasceu em sua casa— eles podem comer ", que pode ser lido:" Eles podem causar comer ".] Porque um feto desqualifica [Se a filha de um Cohein era casada com um israelita, e ele a deixava grávida, e ela não tinha outro filho, o o feto a desqualifica de retornar à casa de seu pai.], e não faz com que comer. [Se a filha de um israelita era casada com um Cohein e ele a deixava grávida, o feto não tem poder para fazê-la comer, e o mesmo se aplica a seus escravos.] Estas são as palavras de R. Yossi: Eles disseram a ele: Agora que você nos testemunhou a respeito da filha de um israelita de um Cohein, a filha de um Cohein também. —seus servos não devem comer terumah por causa da porção do feto (neles). Pois eles são seus escravos, e comem apenas por causa dele, e ele não tem poder para fazê-los comer. A halachá não está de acordo com R. Yossi.]
Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot
Rebbi Eleazar explains the reason given in the Mishnah, that if he has a complaint about virginity he can quickly go to court. A baraita supports Rebbi Eleazar: Since the time of danger they used to marry on Tuesdays and the Sages did not object; about Monday one does not listen to him, but if it was because of a danger it is permitted. What is “because of a danger”? because of sorcery. What is the difference between Monday and Tuesday? One who waits one day cannot be compared to one who waits two days. Why not let him wait two days? That his acquisition should not be sweet for him. Why should his acquisition not be sweet for him? One cannot tolerate it, since Rebbi Hila said in the name of Rebbi Eleazar, if he found the door open, he is forbidden to keep her because she might have been unfaithful. Could we not suspect that she was raped? A rape is public knowledge. And even if you suspect that she was raped, there is no other doubt. There is a doubt whether she was raped or whether she was [willingly] opened. From the words of the Torah one has to be stringent. Rebbi Yose said, if you suspect that she was raped, there are two doubts. There is a doubt whether she was raped or whether she was [willingly] opened; there is a doubt whether it happened after she was preliminarily married or before. From the words of the Torah, with two doubts one has to be lenient.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Sotah
HALAKHAH: “The offering of an Israel’s daughter married to a Cohen,” etc. What is the difference between a Cohen and a Cohen’s daughter? “The flour offering of a Cohen’s daughter is eaten, that of a Cohen is not eaten.” For it is written, “any flour offering of a Cohen shall be total, it should not be eaten;” not the Cohen’s daugher’s. Rebbi Abbahu asked before Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: Is it not written: “If a Cohen acquire a person with his money,” should that apply to a Cohen but not ro a Cohen’s daughter? How is that? “The Cohen anointed in his stead, one of his sons;” one whose son fills his place, that excludes her whose son does not fill her place.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
