Aquele cujo morto [(um de seus parentes que ele é obrigado a lamentar, a quem cabe a ele enterrar)] está mentindo diante dele, está isento do recital do Shemá [de estar preocupado com uma mitzvá], de tefilá e de tefilin. Quanto aos portadores de lixo, seus substitutos, [sendo a prática alternada, todos desejando participar da mitzvá], e os substitutos dos últimos, aqueles antes do lixo [aqueles que devem carregá-lo quando os alcançar] e aqueles atrás isto é, tanto os que estão antes quanto os que estão por trás dele—aqueles cujos serviços são necessários [para levar a maca] são isentos; e aqueles cujos serviços não são necessários [como aqueles que vão apenas acompanhar o falecido para honrá-lo] são obrigados. E ambos estão isentos de tefilá, [não sendo obrigatório pelas Escrituras como é o recital do Shemá. E alguns dizem porque requer uma maior medida de concentração.]
Jerusalem Talmud Nazir
What is a corpse of obligation? Anyone for whom he shouts and nobody comes25In the Babli (43b, Yebamot 89b, Erubin 17b): “Anyone who has nobody to bury him; if he calls and others answer him it is not a corpse of obligation.” The Yerushalmi version is in Śemaḥot 4:29.. If the villagers come, he refrains26Cohen or nazir refrain from defiling themselves.. How many? For the carriers of the bier, their replacements, and the replacements of their replacements27In Śemaḥot 4:30: Carriers of the bier and grave diggers.. If he is not needed; but if he is needed, it is different28If the dead cannot have a decent burial without the help of nazir or Cohen, the latter have to defile themselves.. If [the deceased] is not recognized29If the deceased is not recognized by the locals; if he is recognized the nazir or Cohen is precluded from defiling himself.. But if he is recognized, it is different. If it is not according to his honor; but if it is according to his honor, it is different30This is the introduction to the following paragraphs. If the prestige of the deceased is so great that priests have to defile themselve for his burial, it is obvious that the nazir or Cohen who stumbles on his body also has to defile himself.. For the Patriarch it is his honor.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah
HALAKHAH: Rebbi Ḥiyya stated: Disqualified space disqualifies in three hand-breadths; disqualified roofing disqualifies in four cubits. Rebbi Yose said, we have stated both. “Disqualified space disqualifies in three hand-breadths,” as we have stated: “If the roofing is three hand-breadths distant from the walls it is disqualified192The sukkah is disqualified if along any wall the roofing is not within 3 horizontal hand-breadths..” “Disqualified roofing disqualifies in four cubits,” as we have stated: “If a house partially collapsed and he thatched over it, it is disqualified if from the walls to the thatching it is four cubits200As was stated earlier, a solid roof adjacent or connected to the walls is considered part of the wall, not of the roof. But this is accepted only up to a distance of 4 cubits from the nearest wall. Empty space is acceptable only up to 3 hand-breadths, disqualified material up to 4 cubits..” Therefore less is qualified. May one sleep under that? Rebbi Isaac ben Elyashiv answered: pourable mud completes a miqweh but one may not immerse in it, here also it completes the sukkah but one may not sleep under it204The answer is to a question asked not here but in Berakhot7:1 (Notes 19–29) about the interconnection between rules referring to distinct domains. A miqweh can be used to remove impurities only if it contains 40 se`ah of water, about 135 gallons. If there is not enough clear water, the required volume can be obtained by adding mud which is so moist that it can be poured from a bucket (Mishnah Miqwaot7:1.) R. Eliezer forbids to immerse oneself in mud (Mishnah Miqwaot2:10) but R. Joshua permits. The argument has to be rejected here since R. Joshua will agree that disqualified roofing adjacent to a wall is considered wall, not roofing. Babli 19a.. Ḥizqiah said, because it looks like a bent wall205In his opinion the ruling is a later rabbinic one based on an explicit argument.. Rebbi Hoshaia stated, because it looks like a bent wall. Rebbi Abba, Rebbi Ḥiyya in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan, because it looks like a bent wall. Rebbi Ze`ira, Rebbi Yasa in the name of Cahana, because it looks like a bent wall. Rebbi Jonah said to Rebbi Yose, why do we not say, because disqualified roofing only disqualifies in four cubits206In his opinion, this belongs to the traditional rules of sukkah, predating any rabbinic establishment.?
