Nikt nie błogosławi świecy ani przypraw bałwochwalców [Nie nad świecą, ponieważ nie spoczęła, bo bałwochwalca działał przy jej świetle; i zabronione jest błogosławieństwo nad świecą, która nie zgasła, ponieważ została przez nią popełniona przestępstwo. I nie nad przyprawami bałwochwalców. Nawiązanie do przypraw używanych na uroczystym zgromadzeniu bałwochwalców. I taki jest cel drugiej części Miszny: „A nie nad świecą i nie nad przyprawami przed bałwochwalstwem”, tj. Dlaczego nie błogosławi się przyprawami bałwochwalców? Można bowiem przypuszczać, że uroczyste zgromadzenie bałwochwalców jest dla bałwochwalczych propozycji i zabronione jest błogosławieństwo przypraw używanych do bałwochwalstwa.], A nie nad świecą i przyprawami używanymi za zmarłych, [świecę (za zmarłych) ) były używane do celów zaszczytnych, a przyprawy używane były do rozpraszania woni.] I nie nad świecą i nie nad przyprawami przed bałwochwalstwem. Nikt nie błogosławi świecy, dopóki nie odniesie z niej korzyści [przez jej światło. Nie żeby czerpał z tego korzyść per se, ale żeby był wystarczająco blisko, aby skorzystać z tego, jeśli zechce.]
Tosefta Berakhot
Workers that were doing [work] by the owner of the house [when they have to say Birkat Hamazon (Grace After Meals)] they say [only] two Berachot (blessings) [instead of the four usual Berachot]. [The way they say Birkat Hamazon is as follows.] He (i.e. the worker) says the first Beracha [in the regular fashion]. [Then] he combines [the Beracha] of Jerusalem (i.e. the 3rd Beracha) with [the Beracha] of the land (i.e. the 2nd Beracha) [into one Beracha], and he seals it off with [the ending of the Beracha] of the land. If [the workers] were doing [the work] for him [and receiving] their meal [as pay, instead of money], or the owner of the house was saying the Birkat Hamazon for them [because he ate together with them, even if they were getting paid money for their work, then] they (i.e. the workers) say [all] four Berachot. [These are] the things during meals regarding which Bet Shammai and Bet Hillel argue. Bet Shammai say, “[When a person makes Kiddush on Friday night,] he says the Beracha for the day [first] and [only] after that he says the Beracha on the wine, because the day causes the wine to be brought out, and since the day already began, however the wine has not been brought out yet [until later that evening].” And Bet Hillel say, “[When a person makes Kiddush on Friday night,] he says the Beracha for the wine [first] and [only] after that he says the Beracha on the day, because it is the wine that causes the holiness of the day to be discussed. [Besides this there is] another explanation. The Beracha for the wine is common and the Beracha for the [Shabbat] day is not common.” And the law follows the words of Bet Hillel.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Tosefta Berakhot
[If a person was brought by the waiter wine and perfumed oil at the end of the meal,] Bet Shammai say, “He should hold the cup of wine in his right hand and perfumed oil in his left hand. [Then] he should say the Beracha (blessing) on the wine, and after that [he should make the Beracha] on the oil.” And Bet Hillel say, “He should hold the perfumed oil in his right hand and the cup of wine in his left hand. [Then] he should say a Beracha on the oil and smear it onto the head of the waiter, [if the waiter was in fact an Am Haaretz (a person uneducated in Torah law). However,] if the waiter was a Talmid Chacham (Torah Scholar) [then] he should smear it onto the wall, because it is not praiseworthy for a Talmid Chacham to go out perfumed.”
