Jak świadkowie stają się zomeminami? [Intencja jest taka: ci świadkowie, którzy okazali się być zomeminami („knujący intrygi”) i w których prawo Hazamy nie jest realizowane, tj. W których (Księga Powtórzonego Prawa 19:19): „Wtedy uczynisz z nim jak planował zrobić swojemu bratu „nie może być usatysfakcjonowany, jak oni stają się zomeminami?] (jeśli mówią :) Świadczymy o tym człowieku [a Cohein], że jest synem rozwódki [tj. jego matka była wcześniej rozwiedziona my, zanim się urodził, a on jest wyzwaniem (nie nadaje się do kapłaństwa)], czyli synem chaluca, nie mówimy [jeśli udowodniono im, że byli zomeminami i byli Cohanim], niech ten będzie uważany za syna o rozwódce lub synu chaluca zamiast niego, [jest bowiem napisane: "Wtedy uczynisz z nim, co on podjął"—jemu, a nie jego potomstwu. A jeśli rzucisz mu wyzwanie i jest on Coheinem, sprawiłeś, że jego nasienie jest niezdolne (do kapłaństwa) na zawsze. A jeśli powiesz, uczyńmy go tylko niezdolnym, a nie jego potomstwem—wymagamy „tak, jak on zaplanował”, a tego nie osiąga, gdyż podjął on intrygę, aby uczynić zarówno osądzonych, jak i jego potomstwo niezdolnymi], ale otrzymuje czterdzieści pasów [jest to napisane (tamże 28: 1):… i usprawiedliwiają sprawiedliwego, a złego winą, jeśli grzesznik może być skaleczony, itd. ”: Otóż, czy to dlatego, że usprawiedliwiają sprawiedliwego i oskarżają niegodziwego, niegodziwy jest narażony na skaleczenie! Jest raczej (daje do zrozumienia), że jeśli świadkowie oskarżą tego, który jest (naprawdę) sprawiedliwy, a inni świadkowie przychodzą i usprawiedliwiają tego, który był sprawiedliwy przez cały czas, czyniąc (pierwszych) świadków złymi (tj. Zomemin), to: " jeśli podatny na potknięcia, niech będzie zły ”(gdyby nie można było im uczynić tego, co zamierzali dla prawego)]. (Jeśli powiedzą :) Świadczymy o tym człowieku, że jest on zagrożony wygnaniem, nie mówimy, że niech zostanie wygnany w jego miejsce, ale otrzymuje czterdzieści batów, [jest napisane (tamże 19: 5): „… on ucieknie "— on, a nie jego zomemin.] (Jeśli mówią :) Świadczymy o tym mężu, że rozwiódł się ze swoją żoną [przed nami tego i dzisiaj] i nie dał jej kethubah, [a drugi mówi: Nie rozwód z nią, a nie jestem jej winien kethuba] —teraz, czy dziś, czy jutro, nie da jej kethuba? [tj. co mu zapłacą? Jeśli powiesz całą ketubę, czy on nie umrze lub nie rozwodzi się z nią dzisiaj lub jutro, w którym to przypadku ona i tak ją otrzyma, tak aby nie przynieśli mu żadnej straty!] (Raczej) Szacujemy, ile chciałoby się daj za ketubę tej kobiety [z możliwością], że jeśli owdowiała lub rozwiodła się, [on weźmie ketubę], a jeśli umrze, odziedziczy ją mąż jej [i straci pieniądze, które dał. A to jest kwota, którą świadkowie dają mężowi.] (Jeśli mówią :) Świadczymy o tym mężu, że jest winien sąsiadowi tysiąc zuzów, które musi zapłacić w ciągu trzydziestu dni; i mówi: w ciągu dziesięciu lat szacujemy, ile dałoby się mieć tysiąc zuzów w ręku przez dziesięć lat, a nie przez trzydzieści dni.
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
When do witnesses become zomemin. This is what it means to say, those witnesses that were found zomemin and we don't do to them the law of hazama, meaning that we don't fulfill in them "And do to them as they planned to do to their brother", how are they made zomemin.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Makkot
Introduction
The first six mishnayoth of Makkoth deal with perjuring witnesses, who according to Deuteronomy 20:18-19 are to receive the same punishment that they tried to impose upon the accused. For instance if they testified that a person was guilty of murder and therefore should be executed and then were found to have perjured themselves, they are themselves to be executed.
The first mishnah points out cases where this punishment upon the witnesses cannot be carried out, at least not in a simple fashion.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
We testify about this man so-and-so. Kohen.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Makkot
Although this mishnah begins with the question, how do witnesses become perjurers, we will not learn the mishnaic definition of perjury until mishnah four. This mishnah will instead discuss the punishment of perjuring witnesses who do not, for various, reasons, simply receive the punishment they tried to impose upon the accused.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
That he is the son of a divorced woman. In front of us his mother was divorced before she gave birth and behold he is unfit for the Temple service.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Makkot
How do witnesses become liable [to punishment] as perjurers? [If they say:] “We testify that so and so [a priest] is a son of a woman who had [formerly] been divorced or a haluzah,” it is not said that each witness should himself be as if he was born of a divorcee or a haluzah; rather he receives forty [lashes]. According to Jewish law a kohen (a priest) is not allowed to marry a divorcee or a woman who had undergone the process known as “halitzah”, the refusal of the levirate marriage (marriage to the husband’s brother upon the husband’s death when he had no children, see Deuteronomy 25:5-10). A child born of the union of a priest and a divorcee or a halutzah loses his priestly status. If witnesses falsely testify that a priest is really the son of a divorcee or a halutzah, they are attempting to cause him to forfeit his status. Although in general a perjuring witness is punished with the punishment which he tried to impose, in this case it is impossible to do so. Rather he is punished by being lashed forty times (Deuteronomy 25:3).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
We don't say. If they were made zomemin and they are Kohanim we make them into the son of a divorced woman to fulfill "like they planned", as it is written (Deuteronomy 19:19) "Do to them as they planned", to them and not their children. If we made them unfit for the Temple service, and they are Kohanim, we make their children unfit forever. If you'll say let us invalidate them alone and not their children, we need to fulfill "as they planned", and this wouldn't be doing that, since they planned to invalidate the accused and his children.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Makkot
[If they say]: “We testify that so and so is guilty of [a crime entailing] exile”, it is not said that each witness should himself be exiled; rather he receives forty [lashes]. If witnesses falsely testify that another person committed a crime which entails exile (we will learn which crimes entail exile in chapter two), the perjuring witnesses are not themselves exiled. Rather they received forty lashes.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
Rather they are lashed 40 times. As the verse states (Deuteronomy 25:1-2) "They vindicated the righteous one and convicted the wicked one then it will be if the wicked one deserves to be beaten", [Just] because they convicted the wicked one it will be that he deserves to be beaten? Rather, [it is referring to] witnesses that made wicked a righteous one and came another set of witnesses and they vindicated the original righteous one and changed these [first witnesses] into wicked ones, if that will be then beat the wicked one [with lashes].
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Makkot
[If they say:] “We testify that so and so divorced his wife and has not paid her kethubah” seeing that either today or tomorrow he [the husband] will pay her kethubah, the assessment should be made how much a man will be willing to pay [now] for the ownership of her kethubah, on the condition that if she should be widowed or divorced [he will take it over] but if she should die, her husband will inherit her [estate including the kethubah]. If a person falsely testifies that a man divorced his wife and did not pay her kethubah (marriage settlement) it does not make sense to punish him with a fine equal to the kethubah. Since if the husband should in the future divorce his wife or die and then have to pay the kethubah in any case, by falsely testifying now the perjuring witness didn’t necessarily cause the husband the loss of the kethubah. Rather we assess how much a person would want to pay to take a risk on buying the woman’s kethubah, on condition that if she would be divorced or widowed he would get the kethubah but if she should die before her husband he would not get the kethubah (since the husband inherits his wife). This is what he kethubah is worth at the present moment, while she and her husband are still alive, and this is what the perjuring witnesses therefore have to pay.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
We don't say this one goes to exile. Since it is written regarding a murderer (Deuteronomy 19:5) "He shall flee", he [the murdeer] and not zommemin.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Makkot
[If they say]: “We testify that so and so owes his friend one thousand zuz on the condition that he will pay him within thirty days”, while the debtor says “ten years”, the assessment should be made how much a man is willing to pay for the use of a thousand zuz, whether he pays them in thirty days or ten years. In this scenario the witnesses falsely testify that a certain person borrowed a thousand zuz and must pay them back within thirty days. The accused does owe the thousand zuz but must pay them back only within ten years and not thirty days. Again, in this case we cannot merely fine the perjurers one thousand zuz since in the end the accused will have to pay back the zuz. Rather the witnesses tried to cause him to lose ten years minus thirty days use of the money, and they are therefore fined whatever a person would pay to use one thousand zuz for ten years minus thirty days.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
That he divorced his wife. in front of us such and such a day, and this one [the accused] says "I did not divorce her and I am not obligated to pay her ketubah.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
Is it not that either today or tomorrow. Meaning what do they [the zomemin] pay to him [the accused]? If you say the entire ketubah, perhaps he will die or perhaps he will divorce her today or tomorrow and in the end pay her anyways, and then it comes out that they weren't making him lose anything.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Makkot
We assess how much a person would be willing to pay for this one's ketubah. due to an uncertainty. Since if she is widowed or divorced the one who purchased the ketubah will take [the whole value], and if she dies her husband inherits her and [the purchaser] loses the money he gave [for the ketubah], and this is what the [zomemin] witnesses stipulate to the husband.
