בַּת יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁנִּסֵּת לְכֹהֵן וְהִכְנִיסָה לוֹ עֲבָדִים, בֵּין עַבְדֵי מְלוֹג, בֵּין עַבְדֵי צֹאן בַּרְזֶל, הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ יֹאכְלוּ בַתְּרוּמָה. וּבַת כֹּהֵן שֶׁנִּסֵּת לְיִשְׂרָאֵל, וְהִכְנִיסָה לוֹ, בֵּין עַבְדֵי מְלוֹג, בֵּין עַבְדֵי צֹאן בַּרְזֶל, הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ לֹא יֹאכְלוּ בַתְּרוּמָה:
Si la hija de un israelita se casó con un Cohein, y él murió, dejándola embarazada, sus esclavos no comen terumah debido a la porción del feto (en los esclavos). [Aunque ella tiene hijos de él y come terumah, sus lazos tzon-barzel no comen terumah; porque pertenecen a los herederos, y el feto tiene una porción en ellos, y el feto carece de poder para hacer que coman terumah—ya sea porque sostiene que un feto en el útero de un extraño (al sacerdocio), (es decir, un israelita) es un extraño, o porque sostiene que el que nace hace que (otros) coman; el que aún no ha nacido no causa comer, está escrito (Levítico 22:11): "Y el que ha nacido en su casa— pueden comer ", que se puede leer:" Pueden causar que coman ".] Para un feto descalifica [Si la hija de un Cohein se casó con un israelita, y él la dejó embarazada, y ella no tuvo otro hijo, el el feto la descalifica para que no regrese a la casa de su padre.], y no causa comer. [Si la hija de un israelita se casó con un Cohein, y él la dejó embarazada, el feto carece de poder para hacerla comer, y lo mismo se aplica a sus esclavos.] Estas son las palabras de R. Yossi, que le dijeron: Ahora que nos has testificado acerca de la hija de un israelita a Cohein, la hija de un Cohein, también —sus esclavos no deben comer terumah debido a la porción del feto (en ellos). Porque son sus esclavos, y comen solo por su culpa, y él carece del poder para hacer que coman. La halajá no está de acuerdo con R. Yossi.]
Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot
Rebbi Eleazar explains the reason given in the Mishnah, that if he has a complaint about virginity he can quickly go to court. A baraita supports Rebbi Eleazar: Since the time of danger they used to marry on Tuesdays and the Sages did not object; about Monday one does not listen to him, but if it was because of a danger it is permitted. What is “because of a danger”? because of sorcery. What is the difference between Monday and Tuesday? One who waits one day cannot be compared to one who waits two days. Why not let him wait two days? That his acquisition should not be sweet for him. Why should his acquisition not be sweet for him? One cannot tolerate it, since Rebbi Hila said in the name of Rebbi Eleazar, if he found the door open, he is forbidden to keep her because she might have been unfaithful. Could we not suspect that she was raped? A rape is public knowledge. And even if you suspect that she was raped, there is no other doubt. There is a doubt whether she was raped or whether she was [willingly] opened. From the words of the Torah one has to be stringent. Rebbi Yose said, if you suspect that she was raped, there are two doubts. There is a doubt whether she was raped or whether she was [willingly] opened; there is a doubt whether it happened after she was preliminarily married or before. From the words of the Torah, with two doubts one has to be lenient.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Sotah
HALAKHAH: “The offering of an Israel’s daughter married to a Cohen,” etc. What is the difference between a Cohen and a Cohen’s daughter? “The flour offering of a Cohen’s daughter is eaten, that of a Cohen is not eaten.” For it is written, “any flour offering of a Cohen shall be total, it should not be eaten;” not the Cohen’s daugher’s. Rebbi Abbahu asked before Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: Is it not written: “If a Cohen acquire a person with his money,” should that apply to a Cohen but not ro a Cohen’s daughter? How is that? “The Cohen anointed in his stead, one of his sons;” one whose son fills his place, that excludes her whose son does not fill her place.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
