Talmud sobre Keilim 27:12

שְׁלֹשָׁה עַל שְׁלֹשָׁה שֶׁנִּקְרַע, אִם נְתָנוֹ עַל הַכִּסֵּא וּבְשָׂרוֹ נוֹגֵעַ בַּכִּסֵּא, טָהוֹר, וְאִם לָאו, טָמֵא. שָׁלֹשׁ עַל שָׁלֹשׁ שֶׁנִּמְהָה מִמֶּנָּה חוּט אֶחָד, אוֹ שֶׁנִּמְצָא בוֹ קֶשֶׁר, אוֹ שְׁנֵי חוּטִין מַתְאִימִין, טְהוֹרָה. שָׁלֹשׁ עַל שָׁלֹשׁ שֶׁהִשְׁלִיכָהּ בָּאַשְׁפּוֹת, טְהוֹרָה. הֶחֱזִירָהּ, טְמֵאָה. לְעוֹלָם הַשְׁלָכָתָהּ מְטַהֲרַתָּה, וַחֲזָרָתָהּ מְטַמֵּאתָהּ, חוּץ מִשֶּׁל אַרְגָּמָן וְשֶׁל זְהוֹרִית טוֹבָה. רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר, אַף מַטְלִית חֲדָשָׁה כַּיּוֹצֵא בָהֶן. רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן אוֹמֵר, כֻּלָּן טְהוֹרִין, לֹא הֻזְכְּרוּ אֶלָּא מִפְּנֵי הֲשָׁבַת אֲבֵדָה:

Con respecto a un [pedazo de tela de] tres por tres [ancho de mano] que se rasgó, si uno lo coloca en una silla y [cuando se sienta sobre él] su piel toca la silla, es pura; y si no, es impuro [es decir, puede retener la impureza]. Con respecto a una [pieza de tela de] tres por tres [dedos], si uno de sus hilos estaba desgastado, o si se encontró un nudo en él, o si dos de sus hilos corrían uno al lado del otro [es decir, como una imperfección en su tejido], es puro. Una [pieza de tela de] tres por tres [dedos] que se arrojó al montón de basura es pura. Si uno lo trajo de vuelta [de la basura], es [una vez más susceptible de volverse] impuro. El hecho de que se haya tirado a la basura siempre lo vuelve puro, y su recuperación lo vuelve [susceptible de volverse] impuro, excepto cuando es de color púrpura o carmesí fino [que aún puede volverse impuro incluso después de arrojarlo a la basura]. El rabino Eliezer dice: lo mismo se aplica también a una pieza de tela nueva. El rabino Shimon dice: todos estos son puros; se mencionaron [como excepciones] solo con respecto a la devolución de la propiedad perdida.

Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat

There, we have stated¹¹⁵Mishnah Kelim 28:2. Babli 29a.: “A [cloth] less than three by three [fingerwidths] which he took to plug the bath or to pour a pot¹¹⁶To use it as a potholder. or to clean a millstone, whether it was prepared or not prepared can become impure¹¹⁷For him the rule that textiles of area less that 9 (fingerwidth)² cannot become impure is an empirical one since such a small piece in general is of no use. If somebody finds a use, the piece becomes a regular piece of textile and is subject to all laws of impurity., the words of Rebbi Eliezer. Rebbi Joshua says, (also a new rag)¹¹⁸Probably the words in parenthesis should be deleted; they are not found in any Mishnah ms. and are copied here from the quote later of Mishnah 27:12. whether prepared or not prepared, is pure¹¹⁹For him the three-finger rule is a permanent rabbinic decree which cannot be changed.. Rebbi Aqiba says, prepared it may become impure, not prepared it is pure.” What is the difference between prepared and not prepared? Whether he made it ready in the house or threw it into the garbage¹²⁰A single use does not bring on impurity. If the rag was used once and then thrown away it cannot become impure. But if it is prepared for re-use it becomes valuable and is susceptible to impurity.. But did we not state¹²¹Mishnah Kelim 27:12. תנן is Babylonian spelling.: “Rebbi Eliezer says, also a new rag follows the same rule.¹²²The Mishnah states that an impure piece of (3 fingerwiths)² which was torn loses its impurity only if it is thrown away, with the exception of purple strips which are valuable also in minute sizes and never lose their impurity. R. Eliezer extends the latter rule to unused textiles.” Nobody says “also”, “even”, unless he agree with the preceding; whether he prepared it to hang it up or did not prepare it to hang it up¹²³For re-use.. This learns from the other and the other learns from this. This learns from the other; the words of Rebbi Eliezer if he folded it¹²⁴For the first use; Babli 29b. If it never was intended for use he agrees that it is not susceptible to impurity.. And the other learns from this; if he did not prepare it to hang it up. But if he prepared it to hang it up it may become impure.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Versículo anterior Capítulo completo Versículo siguiente