אֵין מוֹצִיאִין לַאֲכִילַת פֵּרוֹת וּלְשֶׁבַח קַרְקָעוֹת וְלִמְזוֹן הָאִשָּׁה וְהַבָּנוֹת מִנְּכָסִים מְשֻׁעְבָּדִים, מִפְּנֵי תִקּוּן הָעוֹלָם. וְהַמּוֹצֵא מְצִיאָה, לֹא יִשָּׁבַע, מִפְּנֵי תִקּוּן הָעוֹלָם:
El pago no se exige por el consumo de frutas, por el enriquecimiento de la tierra y por el alimento de la esposa y las hijas de la propiedad consolidada, por "el bien general". [Si uno robó un campo y se lo vendió a otro, y él lo sembró y brotó y produjo fruta, y el despojado vino y lo reclamó con su fruta al comprador (reembolsándole solo por sus gastos), el comprador regresa y reclama el precio del campo de la propiedad consolidada, ya que se le vendió a él con una garantía mediante una factura de venta, esto es "un préstamo contra una nota" (milveh bishtar), y (afirma) el precio de la fruta de forma gratuita , y no de bienes vinculados. Lo mismo se aplica cuando el comprador enriquece la tierra plantando árboles o fertilizándola, y cosas por el estilo. ("y para la comida de la esposa y las hijas de uno" :) esta es una condición de la kethubah, a saber: "Y habitarás en mi casa y serás alimentado a través de mi propiedad; y las hijas que tienes por mí habitarán en mi casa y ser alimentado a través de mi propiedad, etc. " Cuando vienen a reclamar su comida, lo hacen solo de la propiedad libre, y no de la propiedad consolidada. ("para 'el bien general'" :) Porque estas son cosas indeterminadas y no se pueden hacer concesiones exactas para ellos.] Y si uno encuentra un objeto perdido [y lo devuelve, y el propietario afirmó que no lo devolvió todo ], él no hace un juramento, por "el bien general". [Porque si se le impusiera un juramento, nadie se esforzaría por devolver un objeto perdido.]
Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot
If there were two daughters and one son; the first one took a tenth of the estate, but the son died before the second could take her tenth. Rebbi Ḥanina was of the opinion that the second takes a tenth of the estate and the rest they divide equally among themselves. Rebbi Joḥanan told him that in this case there was nothing else to provide for her, but here she may sell from the remainder and provide for herself! Rebbi Tebi in the name of Rebbi Joshia: The reason of Rebbi Ḥanina: If she can collect from encumbered real estate, from what lies before her not so much more? Rebbi Joḥanan sticks to his opinion, since Rebbi Ze‘ira said that Rebbi Joḥanan does not collect. Who collects? Rebbi Ḥanina [and Rebbi Hila] collect. Rebbi Yasa was appointed custodian of orphans’ property. There were orphan [girls] who asked to be provided for. He brought the case before Rebbi Eleazar and Rebbi Simeon bar Yaqim. Rebbi Simeon bar Yaqim said, is it not better to provide for them from their father’s estate rather than from charity? Rebbi Eleazar said to him: If such a case came before our teachers, our teachers would not touch it; would we act? Rebbi Yose said, I shall give to them, and if some orphans get up and complain, I would give it to them. Even so, they saw and did not complain. Rebbi Ze‘ira asked before Rebbi Yose: How do you decide in practical cases? He said to him, following Rebbi Ḥanina. And so an actual case was decided following Rebbi Ḥanina. Rebbi Abun in the name of Rebbi Hila: One considers the estate as if it were dry.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Ketubot
What is the situation of grandchildren? Rebbi Mana said, [grandchildren are like children. Rebbi Yose said, grandchildren are not like children.] Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Ḥanina and Rebbi Mattaniah were sitting together. They wanted to say, the same situation applies to grandchildren here as there. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Ḥanina said to him, inheritance by biblical law jumped on grandchildren.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
