Wenn es eine Grube voller gezogener Gewässer gibt und ein Kanal [von Regenwasser] in sie eintritt und von ihr austritt, befindet sie sich für immer in ihrem ungültigen Zustand, bis berechnet wird, dass nicht mehr [in der Grube] drei Baumstämme [ in der Grube] verbleiben. oder mehr von gezogenem Wasser] aus der ursprünglichen Menge. Zwei Personen , die fielen, dies ist ein Protokoll und eine Hälfte und dass man ein Protokoll und eine Hälfte in eine Mikwe ; oder einer, der seine Kleidung auswringt und sie aus vielen Bereichen [der Kleidung] [Wasser in die Mikwe ] tropft ; oder einer, der [Wasser] aus einem Tzirtzur [einem Steingefäß mit einer Netzöffnung] ausgießt und es aus vielen Bereichen [des Gefäßes] abfällt; Rabbi Akiva hält diese [solchen Fälle] für gültig, und die Weisen halten sie für ungültig. Rabbi Akiva sagte: "Sie sagten nicht 'wenn sie fallen [drei Logarithmen gezogenes Wasser, es wird ungültig]', sondern 'wenn es fällt'. [was bedeutet, dass es nur ungültig ist, wenn das Wasser nur aus einer Quelle eingedrungen ist] "Sie sagten zu ihm:" Sie sagten weder dies noch das. Eher [sie sagten] 'einer, in den drei Holzstämme hineingefallen sind [wird ungültig gemacht und es gibt keinen Unterschied zwischen dem Löschen aus einer oder mehreren Quellen]. '"
Bartenura on Mishnah Mikvaot
האמה נכנסת לו (the water channel enters it) – as for example rain waters that come from the sloping and enter it.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Mikvaot
If a cistern is full of drawn water and a channel leads into it and out of it, it continues to be invalid until it can be reckoned that there does not remain in it three logs of the former [water]. The water flowing through the channel is valid to be used as a mikveh. It will validate the cistern full of drawn water when we can assume that the channel has flushed out most of the drawn water, leaving no more than three logs worth in the cistern.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Mikvaot
הסוחט את כסותו (a person who wrings out his garment) – and the water that was absorbed by it is considered drawn water, and when he wrings them out into the cistern/pit they come from many places, that from here and from there to the clothing.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Mikvaot
If two men each poured a log and a half [of drawn water] into a mikveh, or if one wrung out his clothes and so poured in [water] from several places, or if one emptied out a water-jug and so poured in [water]from several places, Rabbi Akiva declares it valid, But the sages declare it invalid. Rabbi Akiva said: they did not say "if they poured in," rather "if one poured in." But they said: they said neither thus nor thus, but rather "if there fell in three logs [of drawn water]." Rabbi Akiva says that for three logs of drawn water to invalidate a mikveh, they must all come from one source made in one pouring. Separate pourings do not join together to invalidate the mikveh. The water-jug to which he refers seems to have multiple spouts, so if one person pours in, it gets there in several pouring. The other sages disagree. Three logs of drawn water invalidate the mikveh even if they come from multiple sources. Both Rabbi Akiva and the sages derive their halakhah from a precise understanding of their received oral tradition. Rabbi Akiva's mishnah reads "If one poured into a mikveh three logs of drawn water he invalidates it." Rabbi Akiva reads this mishnah precisely it is invalid only if one poured three logs in. If two or more together poured three logs into the mikveh, it is not invalid. The other sages have a different reading in their older mishnah. There mishnah reads "if there fell in…" There is no difference how these three logs got in. Their very presence invalidates the mikveh. As an aside, this is one of the most interesting examples I have come across of two sages arguing over the wording of an ancient mishnah. It is a clear example of the fact that prior to the generation of Rabbi Akiva there already existed an oral Torah upon which each sage could base his argument.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Mikvaot
והמערה מן הצרצור (if one pouring water out of a cooler throws water out in several places) – an earthenware utensil that they make on its mouth network of lattice-work, and when he empties [water] from it, he pours in water from many places.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Mikvaot
ר' עקיבא מכשיר – for he (i.e., Rabbi Akiva) holds that three LOGS of drawn water do not invalidate the Mikveh/ritual bath unless he pours them from one utensil and from one place, what is not the case with garments and a water cooler.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Mikvaot
וחכמים פוסלים – for they (i.e., the Sages) hold that three utensils combine.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Mikvaot
לא אמרו מטילין אלא מטיל – according to this language, Rabbi Akiva received [the tradition] from his Rabbis/teachers, a utensil that pours three LOGS of water to a Mikveh invalidates the Mikveh/ritual bath.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Mikvaot
ולא כך אמרו אלא שנפלו – it does not make a difference whether it is from one utensil or from many utensils. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Akiva.
