Fünf Gruppen, die in einem Traklin wohnen [ein Herrenhaus, das in fünf Abschnitte unterteilt ist, von denen jeder einen Eingang zum Innenhof hat und mit denen, die sich den Innenhof teilen, einen Eruv benötigt] —Beth Shammai sagt: Ein Eruv (ist erforderlich) für jede Gruppe. [Die Domänen sind aufgeteilt und jede Gruppe muss einen Laib für den Eruv des Hofes bereitstellen.] Beth Hillel sagt: Ein Eruv (genügt) für alle. [Diese Aufteilung stellt keine Trennung von Domänen dar.] Und sie räumen ein, dass, wenn einige von ihnen in Räumen oder oberen Kammern wohnen, für jede Gruppe ein separater Eruv erforderlich ist. [Wenn die Traklin durch hohe Trennwände bis zur Decke geteilt ist, sind sich alle einig, dass dies eine Trennung von Domänen darstellt, was dem Wohnen in Räumen oder oberen Kammern entspricht. Sie unterscheiden sich, wenn es durch niedrige Trennwände geteilt wird, die die Decke nicht erreichen. Beth Shammai ist der Ansicht, dass eine solche Aufteilung eine Trennung der Domäne bewirkt, und Beth Hillel, dass dies nicht der Fall ist.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
בטרקלין – a large and wide house, the seat of kings and they divided it to five [rooms] and all of them has an doorway from the reception room to the courtyard and they need to make an Eruv with the other members of the courtyard.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
Introduction
This mishnah deals with a situation where five different companies of men are spending Shabbat in one hall within a courtyard. The question is whether each company must contribute separately to the courtyard’s eruv set, or whether it is sufficient for all of the five companies to make one joint contribution to the eruv.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
בית שמאי אומרים – their domains are divided and each group/party needs to place bread for the Eruv of the courtyard.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
Five companies [of men] who spent Shabbat in one hall:: Bet Shammai says: an eruv for each an every company; But Bet Hillel says: one eruv for them all. According to Bet Shammai, since each of the five groups is distinct from the other, they must each set up their own eruv. Bet Hillel holds that since they are residing in the same hall, they can be treated as one entity and they may make one joint contribution to the eruv.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
ב"ה אומרים – this partition does not [provide] the division of domains. But at the time when they divided the reception room into large partitions that reach the ceiling, no one disagrees that this is a division of domains because they are living in rooms or in attics But they do disagree when divided into low partitions that do not reach the ceiling, as the School of Shammai holds that a partition such as this divides the domain and the School of Hillel holds that there is no division of domains.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
They agree that where some of them occupy rooms or upper chambers, that they must make an eruv for each and every company. If the hall leads to other rooms or to upper chambers and some members of the various groups are in these other areas, each company must make a separate contribution to the eruv. Even though all of these areas are connected to the main hall, the hall is not sufficient to make it as if they were all in the same house. The Yerushalmi explains that the hall is to the rooms as a courtyard is to houses: just as every house connected to the courtyard must contribute to the eruv, so too every company in the hall must contribute.
