Komentarz do Szewuot 2:1

יְדִיעוֹת הַטֻּמְאָה שְׁתַּיִם שֶׁהֵן אַרְבַּע. נִטְמָא וְיָדַע וְנֶעֶלְמָה מִמֶּנּוּ הַטֻּמְאָה וְזָכוּר אֶת הַקֹּדֶשׁ, נֶעְלַם מִמֶּנּוּ הַקֹּדֶשׁ וְזָכוּר אֶת הַטֻּמְאָה, נֶעֶלְמוּ מִמֶּנּוּ זֶה וָזֶה וְאָכַל אֶת הַקֹּדֶשׁ וְלֹא יָדַע, וּמִשֶּׁאָכַל יָדַע, הֲרֵי זֶה בְעוֹלֶה וְיוֹרֵד. נִטְמָא וְיָדַע וְנֶעֶלְמָה מִמֶּנּוּ טֻמְאָה וְזָכוּר אֶת הַמִּקְדָּשׁ, נֶעְלַם מִמֶּנּוּ מִקְדָּשׁ וְזָכוּר אֶת הַטֻּמְאָה, נֶעֶלְמוּ מִמֶּנּוּ זֶה וָזֶה וְנִכְנַס לַמִּקְדָּשׁ וְלֹא יָדַע, וּמִשֶּׁיָּצָא יָדַע, הֲרֵי זֶה בְעוֹלֶה וְיוֹרֵד:

Świadomości nieczystości są dwa, czyli cztery. Gdyby stał się nieczysty i wiedział [że był nieczysty w czasie zetknięcia lub później], a nieczystość była (później) przed nim ukryta i pamiętał o świętości [i z powodu tej „ukrycia” (nieczystości) ) zjadał uświęcone jedzenie—jeden; albo wszedł do sanktuarium—dwa. Oto dwa, które są napisane. (Księga Kapłańska 5: 2): „I niech będzie zakryte przed nim, a on jest nieczysty” oznacza, że nieczystość jest przed nim ukryta. A ponieważ nie ponosi odpowiedzialności, dopóki nie jest świadomy na początku, że stał się nieczysty, po czym został przed nim ukryty, mamy „świadomość”.] Jeśli świętość byłaby przed nim ukryta [tj. Fakt, że jest on uświęcony pokarmem albo fakt, że jest to sanktuarium, a on zjadł jedno lub wszedł do drugiego] i przypomniał sobie o swojej nieczystości [—To są dwa inne, które nie zostały zapisane.] Jeśli obaj byli przed nim ukrywani i zjadł uświęcony pokarm nieświadomie, a po zjedzeniu stał się świadomy, jest odpowiedzialny za ofiarę oleh veyored. [To nie jest część liczby. Jesteśmy właśnie powiadamiani, że chociaż zjadł uświęcony pokarm lub wszedł do sanktuarium, nie pamiętał ani o nieczystości, ani o sanktuarium, jest odpowiedzialny za ofiarę oleh veyored.] Jeśli stał się nieczysty i wiedział o tym, a nieczystość była ukryta od niego i wspominał o sanktuarium; jeśli świątynia była przed nim ukryta, a on pamiętał o swojej nieczystości; jeśli obaj byli przed nim ukryci i wszedł do sanktuarium nieświadomie, a kiedy wyszedł, zdał sobie sprawę, że jest odpowiedzialny za ofiarę oleh veyored.

Bartenura on Mishnah Shevuot

ידיעות הטומאה. נטמא וידע – [that he became defiled and was aware] that he became defiled at the time of of defilement or afterwards.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Shevuot

Introduction Mishnah one discusses the second clause of the first mishnah of chapter one, which dealt with the case where a person either entered the Temple or ate holy food without knowing that he was impure.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Shevuot

נעלמה ממנו טומאה – and through that same act of forgetfulness/lack of awareness, he ate Holy Things, which is one [count], and he entered into the Sanctuary/Temple, which is two [counts], as it is written (Leviticus 5:4): “and the fact has escaped him,” and he is unclean/defiled, which implies that the defilement escaped him. But because he is not liable for it other than if he was aware at the beginning that he had become defiled/unclean and afterwards, it escaped him, because of this, it (i.e., the Mishnah) calls it: ידיעות הטמאה/awareness (plural) of uncleanness.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Shevuot

The first line of the mishnah is a quote of the second clause of the first mishnah in chapter one. After a long digression in chapter one in which the mishnah discussed which goats offered as sin-offerings atone for which types of crimes, our chapter returns to discuss the main topic at hand: the case where a person unknowingly became impure and entered the Temple or ate holy food. To refresh our memories, according to chapter one in order to enter into this category one must first have awareness then forgetfulness and then awareness. Our mishnah explains the four different possibilities for such a scenario.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Shevuot

ונעלם ממנו הקודש – or the Temple/Sanctuary, but if he ate Holy Things or entered into the Temple, and he was mindful of defilement, there are two other [counts] that are not written [in the Bible].

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Shevuot

The laws concerning the discovery of having contracted uncleanness are of two kinds, subdivided into four;
[If] he became impure and was aware of it, then he forgot that he had been impure, though he remembered that the food was holy; [If the fact that it was] holy food was unknown to him, though he remembered that he was impure; [If] both were unknown to him; And he ate holy food, and was not aware, and after he had eaten, he became aware: in these cases he brings a sliding scale sacrifice. In all of the cases mentioned in this section the transgression is the eating of holy food while impure. There are actually three different possibilities mentioned in the mishnah, although the mishnah considers them to be two: 1) He knew that had contracted impurity, and then forgot but he knew that the food that he was eating was holy; 2) He forgot that the food that he was eating was holy but he knew that he was impure; 3) He forgot that the food was holy and that he was impure. In all of these cases if he were to eat of the holy food while being unaware either that he was impure or that the food was holy (or both) and afterwards realized that the food was holy or that he was impure, he is obligated to bring a sliding scale sacrifice. A sliding scale sacrifice is a sacrifice brought based on the economic means of the sinner. If he has financial means he must bring either a sheep or goat. If he cannot afford a sheep or a goat he brings two turtledoves. If he can’t even afford these, he may bring a grain offering. This sacrifice is described in Leviticus 5:6-13.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Shevuot

[[If] he became impure and was aware of it, then he forgot that he had been impure, though he remembered that [he was entering] the Temple; [If the fact that he was entering] the Temple was unknown to him, though he remembered that he was impure; [If] both were hidden from him; And he entered the Temple and was not aware, and after he had gone out, became aware: in these cases he brings a sliding scale sacrifice. This section teaches the exact same law as in section one, except the sin discussed here is entrance into the Temple while impure. In this case either forgetting that he is entering the Temple or forgetting that he is impure or both will obligate him to bring a sliding scale sacrifice.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Shevuot

נעלם ממנו זה וזה – it is not from the numbers of awareness, but it comes to tell us that even though that at the time of eating Holy Things or entering into the Temple, he was not mindful neither of defilement nor of the holiness [of the Temple], and he Is liable for the sliding-scale offering (depending upon his financial situation).

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Shevuot

Questions for Further Thought:
• Why does the mishnah consider the three possibilities in each section to be only two?

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Cały rozdział Następny werset