R. Akiwa rzekł do nich (mędrcom): Czy nie przyznacie mi, że jeśli ktoś umieści jego eruw w jaskini, to ma tylko dwa tysiące łokci od miejsca jego eruu? Odpowiedzieli: Kiedy tak jest? Kiedy nie nadaje się do zamieszkania, [jakby zostały naruszone jego przegrody]; ale gdyby nadawał się do zamieszkania, przechodzi on wszystko, a poza nim dwa tysiące łokci. [Bo gdyby nadawał się do zamieszkania, nawet gdyby był teraz niezamieszkany, według mędrców byłby uważany za całość na cztery łokcie. Podobnie miasto, w którym nikt nie mieszka, ale które ma rondo ścienne—jeśli umieści się w nim jego eruw, uważa się go za cztery łokcie, nawet jeśli jest tak duży jak Antiocha]. Okazuje się więc, że jaskinia jest bardziej pobłażliwa, ponieważ wnętrze jaskini (w porównaniu z halachą) jest większe niż jej wierzchołek. [Bo jeśli ktoś umieści swój eruv na szczycie jaskini, ma tylko dwa tysiące łokci od miejsca jego eruu, a jej wierzchołek nie nadaje się do zamieszkania, podczas gdy może przejść całe jej wnętrze i dwa tysiące łokci poza nią. ] Ale jeśli chodzi o pomiar, to dostanie (tylko) dwa tysiące, nawet jeśli miara kończy się w jaskini. [Chociaż mędrcy różnią się od R. Akiwy w stosunku do umieszczenia jego eruwu w mieście, mówiąc, że całe miasto jest uważane za cztery łokcie, przyznają, że jeśli ktoś pochodzi z miejsca jego zamieszkania i pomiaru dwa tysiące kończy się nawet w jaskini nadającej się do zamieszkania, nie może wejść poza (zakończenie) swojego pomiaru.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
אימתי בזמן שאין בה דיורים – that their partitions were torn down and are not fit for inhabitants, for if it were fit for residents, even though there are none in it now, inhabitants are not considered everything like four cubits, and even if it is large like Antioch.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
Introduction
This mishnah is a direct continuation of the second clause of yesterday’s mishnah. To remind ourselves, Rabbi Akiva and the Sages had a debate concerning a person in one city who places his eruv in another city which is within the Shabbat border of his own city. According to Rabbi Akiva, this is treated as a normal case he may go 2000 cubits from his eruv and no more. The Sages hold that the city itself only counts as four cubits and that he may continue to go beyond the city the distance which remains to him after traveling from the first city.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
נמצא קל תוכה מעל גבה – for whereas the [Eruv] on top of the cave , if he placed there his Eruv, he does not have anything other than two-thousand cubits from the place of his Eruv, for on top of it is not fit for inhabitants, but inside , he walks throughout and outside of it two-thousand cubits.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
Rabbi Akiva said to them: Do you not agree with me that one who puts his eruv in a cave may walk no further than two thousand cubits from the place of his eruv? One who puts his eruv in a cave outside of his city, may travel another 2000 cubits outside of the eruv, including the length of the cave. The cave does not count for just four cubits rather each cubit within it counts. Rabbi Akiva asks the sages why they agree concerning this halakhah but not concerning one who puts his eruv in a neighboring city. In other words, why in the case of the city does the entire city only count as four cubits, no matter how large it is?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
ולמודד שאמרו – even though that the Sages dispute on Rabbi Akiva when placing his Eruv in the city/town to state that the entire city is to him like four cubits, they admit that someone who comes from the place of his Sabbath camp and his measurement of two-thousand cubits ended, even in a cave where there are inhabitants, that he doesn’t enter further from his measurement at all.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
They replied: when is this true? Only where no people dwell in it, but where people dwell in it one may walk through the whole of it and two thousand cubits beyond it. The sages respond that the rule regarding one who puts his eruv in a cave is true only if no one lives in the cave. The situation regarding the city is different when he puts his eruv there he counts as one of its residents. Just as the city’s residents may travel anywhere in the city and not have it count toward their 2000 cubits, so too he may travel anywhere in the city and not have it count towards his 2000 cubits.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
Thus [where an eruv is put] within [the cave] the law is more lenient than [where one is put] on top of it. This section is way of remembering the rule of the Sages in section two. If the eruv is put on top of a cave which is in a city, then the eruv is in the city and he may walk within the entire city and not have it count toward his 2000 cubits. However, if he puts the eruv in the cave below the city, the cave and certainly the city count toward his 2000 cubit limit. This means that the law is more lenient when the eruv is on top then when it is within.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
And to the measurer, of whom they spoke, they give him a distance of two thousand cubits even if the end of his measure terminates within a cave. In this section the sages agree with Rabbi Akiva concerning one who measures his Shabbat border, that he gets only 2000 cubits, even if this measure ends in the middle of a cave. Even if there are residents in the cave, he still cannot go through to the end of the cave, because his original Shabbat limit ended before he got there. This matches what we learned in the beginning of yesterday’s mishnah, concerning a Shabbat border that ends within a neighboring city. In such a case, he may only go up to the end of his Shabbat border.
