Komentarz do Eruwin 5:8
אַנְשֵׁי עִיר גְּדוֹלָה מְהַלְּכִין אֶת כָּל עִיר קְטַנָּה, וְאֵין אַנְשֵׁי עִיר קְטַנָּה מְהַלְּכִין אֶת כָּל עִיר גְּדוֹלָה. כֵּיצַד. מִי שֶׁהָיָה בְעִיר גְּדוֹלָה וְנָתַן אֶת עֵרוּבוֹ בְעִיר קְטַנָּה, בְּעִיר קְטַנָּה וְנָתַן אֶת עֵרוּבוֹ בְעִיר גְּדוֹלָה, מְהַלֵּךְ אֶת כֻּלָּהּ וְחוּצָה לָהּ אַלְפַּיִם אַמָּה. וְרַבִּי עֲקִיבָא אוֹמֵר, אֵין לוֹ אֶלָּא מִמְּקוֹם עֵרוּבוֹ אַלְפַּיִם אַמָּה:
Mężowie wielkiego miasta przemierzają całe małe miasto [Jeśli małe miasto było w granicach dwóch tysięcy łokci, a oni przez nie przechodzą, przechodzą przez całe małe miasto, jakby było cztery łokcie, i dokonali pomiaru poza nim.], ale ludzie z małego miasta nie przechodzą przez całe wielkie miasto [jak gdyby było na cztery łokcie. Bo mierzenie jego tchum kończy się w wielkim mieście, z tego powodu mogą jechać tylko do zakończenia ich tchum.] Jak to? Jeśli ktoś był w dużym mieście i umieścił swój eruw w małym mieście; lub, jeśli był w małym mieście i umieścił swój eruw w dużym mieście, przemierza je wszystkie, a poza nim dwa tysiące łokci. [Nasza Miszna jest wadliwa. Oto, czego uczono: „Ludzie z dużego miasta przemierzają całe małe miasto, ale ludzie z małego miasta nie przechodzą przez całe duże miasto. Kiedy tak jest? Kiedy mierzy dwa tysiące łokci. Ale jeśli umieści jego eruw w mieście—Niezależnie od tego, czy ludzie dużego miasta umieszczają swój eruw w małym mieście, czy ludzie z małego miasta umieszczają swój eruv w dużym mieście, przemierzają całe miasto, w którym zostały umieszczone eruwy, jak gdyby miały cztery łokcie. Jak to? Gdyby ktoś był z dużego miasta i umieścił swoją eruw w małym mieście, itd. ”] R. Akiwa mówi: Ma tylko dwa tysiące łokci od miejsca jego eruu. [Różni się pierwszą tanną i utrzymuje, że eruv nie powoduje, że miasto, w którym się znajduje, jest uważane za cztery łokcie, a dwa tysiące łokci liczone są tylko od miejsca eruu. Halacha jest niezgodna z R. Akivą.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
How is this so? If a man was in a large town and deposited his eruv in a small town or if he stayed in a small town and deposited his eruv in a large town, he may walk through all the town and two thousand cubits beyond it.
Rabbi Akiva says: he only has the place of his eruv and another two thousand cubits.
The wording of our mishnah is somewhat difficult, and the talmudic sages already recognized different versions. However, the different versions are usually explained the same way. All agree that one who resides in a town and begins Shabbat there can travel two thousand cubits in all directions. However, the sages debate concerning a person who resides in one town but puts his eruv in another town. The question is: does this eruv, placed in another town, allow him to walk throughout the town and two thousand cubits around it, or is the area of the town included in the two thousand cubits? In other words, since he acquired his “Shabbat place” in that town through an eruv and not through his actually being there, is he treated as if he was there or do we look at this as a normal case of placing one’s eruv outside of one’s own town?
The other issue in the mishnah is concerning one who measures the two thousand cubits around his city and finds that another city is within this area. If the two thousand cubits ends in the middle of the city, all of the sages agree that he cannot go anywhere beyond the city on the other side. However, if the two thousand cubits ends at the end of the city, the city is treated as if it was merely four cubits in area and it doesn’t count for the two thousand cubit measure. Rather the two thousand cubits is completed on the other side of the city. This halakhah is the first section of the mishnah.
Section one: As I explained in the introduction, the wording of this mishnah is quite difficult. I shall explain the mishnah in the same that Albeck and Kehati do. The people of a large town, who have a small town entirely within their 2000 cubit Shabbat border, may walk throughout the entire small town and it counts only as four cubits toward their Shabbat limit. The remaining 2000 cubits surrounding the large town continue on the other side. For instance if there are 96 cubits from the large town to the small town, and the small town is 1800 cubits, he may walk through the whole small town and another 1900 cubits on the other side, since the town itself counts as only four cubits.
However, if the Shabbat border of a small town ends within a neighboring large town, the people from the small town can only walk within it up until their border ends.
We should note that according to this explanation, the size of the person’s original town does not seem to matter all that much. All that matters is whether or not the Shabbat border ends within the neighboring town.
Section two: The phrase “how is this so” does not seem to explain the previous clause in the mishnah. Hence, the Yerushalmi removes the word, whereas the Bavli adds in an entire clause. In any case, it seems that this is a new section and not a continuation of the previous one. This section deals with a person from one city who puts his eruv in another city. According to the first opinion, if one puts his eruv in another city that is within the 2000 cubits of one’s own city, the eruv makes the person as if he was a full resident of that city. Therefore, he may walk the full area of the city, plus 2000 cubits around it, just as can the residents of that city.
Rabbi Akiva disagrees and holds that the eruv in the other city works as do all normal eruvin they allow one to walk 2000 cubits beyond the eruv. If the city in which the eruv was placed goes further, he may not walk in that area of the city.