Talmud su Yevamot 3:10

שְׁנַיִם שֶׁקִדְּשׁוּ שְׁתֵּי נָשִׁים, וּבִשְׁעַת כְּנִיסָתָן לַחֻפָּה הֶחֱלִיפוּ אֶת שֶׁל זֶה לָזֶה, וְאֶת שֶׁל זֶה לָזֶה, הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ חַיָּבִים מִשּׁוּם אֵשֶׁת אִישׁ. הָיוּ אַחִין, מִשּׁוּם אֵשֶׁת אָח. וְאִם הָיוּ אֲחָיוֹת, מִשּׁוּם אִשָּׁה אֶל אֲחוֹתָהּ. וְאִם הָיוּ נִדּוֹת, מִשּׁוּם נִדָּה. וּמַפְרִישִׁין אוֹתָן שְׁלֹשָׁה חֳדָשִׁים, שֶׁמָּא מְעֻבָּרוֹת הֵן. וְאִם הָיוּ קְטַנּוֹת שֶׁאֵינָן רְאוּיוֹת לֵילֵד, מַחֲזִירִין אוֹתָן מִיָּד. וְאִם הָיוּ כֹהֲנוֹת, נִפְסְלוּ מִן הַתְּרוּמָה:

Se due uomini hanno sposato due donne e quando le hanno prese in matrimonio (cioè, convivenza), le hanno (involontariamente) scambiate, sono responsabili (per un sacrificio per il peccato) a causa dell'adulterio. Se erano fratelli, sono responsabili [in aggiunta] a causa della moglie di un fratello. E se fossero sorelle (sono responsabili in aggiunta) a causa di (l'interdetto contro) prendere una donna e sua sorella. E se fossero niddoth (sono responsabili in aggiunta) a causa di (l'interdetto contro vivere con) un niddah. [Anche se governiamo che un interdetto non è sovrapposto a un altro, questo tanna lo sostiene con issur kollel (un interdetto completo), issur mosif (un interdetto sovrapposto) e issur bath-achath (un interdetto simultaneo), come in questo ad esempio, un interdetto si sovrappone all'altro e ciascuno richiede un'offerta separata per il peccato.] E sono separati [per non tornare dai loro mariti] per tre mesi, per non rimanere incinta [e i bambini essere mamzerim. Ed è necessario discriminare tra seme che è kasher e seme che non lo è, che (quest'ultimo) non sia attribuito ai loro mariti)]. E se fossero minori che non erano in grado di sopportare, sarebbero immediatamente restituiti. E se fossero le figlie di Cohanim, sarebbero inadatte a mangiare il teruma [nelle case dei loro padri, anche dopo la morte dei loro mariti, e anche se si scambiarono inconsapevolmente.]

Jerusalem Talmud Kiddushin

If both were Cohanim or brothers, both are forbidden⁵⁹Here starts a discussion of the statement of the Mishnah that the situation can be resolved if one of the men writes a bill of divorce and the other marries the woman. There are cases in which both must divorce and neither of them can marry: A Cohen may not marry a divorcee; this includes a woman who is divorced without ever being really married. The wife of a brother is prohibited to her brother-in- law except in the case of a required levirate marriage. In the case of the Mishnah, if the two men are brothers, the woman is forbidden to either of them as the brother’s wife.. If there were three brothers; two of them contracted a preliminary marriage with her and then died. That is what Rebbi Ḥiyya stated⁶⁰Yebamot 3:10, Note 137.: The wife of one deceased contracts levirate marriage but not the wife of two deceased men. If they were brothers, both contracted a preliminary marriage with her and then one of them died. Is she permitted to the second? As you take it, what he had acquired, he had acquired; the rest he inherits from his brother⁶¹The argument is that the surviving brother should be allowed to marry both in his own right and as levir.. Rebbi Jehudah ben Pazi said, she is forbidden to him. Rebbi Yose said, the reason of Rebbi Jehudah ben Pazi is that the aspect acquired in any sister-in-law who is not totally inside [the family] is considered to be under the incest prohibition and an incest prohibition frees the co-wife⁶²Yebamot 2:2, Note 55. The argument of Note 61 is invalid: Levirate is possible only if the brother’s marriage was undoubtedly valid.. Rebbi Ḥanina said, Rebbi Jehudah ben Pazi said it correctly. Does she not become his because of his brother? To his brother she was forbidden⁵⁹Here starts a discussion of the statement of the Mishnah that the situation can be resolved if one of the men writes a bill of divorce and the other marries the woman. There are cases in which both must divorce and neither of them can marry: A Cohen may not marry a divorcee; this includes a woman who is divorced without ever being really married. The wife of a brother is prohibited to her brother-in- law except in the case of a required levirate marriage. In the case of the Mishnah, if the two men are brothers, the woman is forbidden to either of them as the brother’s wife.; to him she should be permitted?

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Versetto precedente Capitolo completo Versetto successivo