Mishnah
Mishnah

Talmud su Yadayim 3:2

כֹּל הַפּוֹסֵל אֶת הַתְּרוּמָה, מְטַמֵּא אֶת הַיָּדַיִם לִהְיוֹת שְׁנִיּוֹת. הַיָּד מְטַמְּאָה אֶת חֲבֶרְתָּהּ, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אֵין שֵׁנִי עוֹשֶׂה שֵׁנִי. אָמַר לָהֶם, וַהֲלֹא כִתְבֵי הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנִיִּים מְטַמְּאִין אֶת הַיָּדַיִם. אָמְרוּ לוֹ, אֵין דָּנִין דִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה מִדִּבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים, וְלֹא דִבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים מִדִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה, וְלֹא דִבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים מִדִּבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים:

Tutto ciò che invalida la terumah [una parte di un raccolto che deve essere data a un sacerdote e che può essere consumato solo dai sacerdoti o dalla loro famiglia] rende le mani di un [grado di] impurità secondaria. Una mano rende impura la sua compagna, secondo il rabbino Yehoshua. E i saggi dicono: qualcosa [di un [grado di impurità] secondario non può rendere qualcosa [di un] [grado di impurità] secondario. Egli disse loro: non sono sacre scritture [di un [grado di impurità] secondario, e rendono le mani impure [con un grado di impurità secondario] !? Gli dissero: non possiamo dedurre le parole della Torah [cioè le leggi nella Torah scritta] dalle parole degli studiosi [cioè le leggi nella Torah orale], né le parole degli studiosi dalle parole della Torah, né le parole degli studiosi dalle parole degli studiosi.

Jerusalem Talmud Chagigah

“For heave, if one of his hands became impure the other remains pure.” “To make sancta impure, the words of Rebbi. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah says, to disqualify sancta.115Tosephta 3:10; Babli 24a. The text of the Tosephta is: A person who immerses one hand and prepares food in purity, any food prepared until he immerses the other hand is impure since one hand makes the other impure to make sancta impure …” The Tosephta implies that if one hand is impure, in preparation of sancta the other is impure in the second degree for Rebbi, in the third for R. Yose ben R. Jehudah.” How? Following Rebbi Joshua? As we have stated there116Mishnah Yadaim 3:2., “anything which disqualifies heave makes hands impure in the second degree, and one hand makes the other one impure, the words of Rebbi Joshua.” And Rebbi Joshua says more than Rebbi, since what Rebbi said refers to sancta, but Rebbi Joshua refers to heave117Therefore the Mishnah here which treats heave (disqualified by second degree impurity) more leniently than sancta (disqualified by third degree impurity) cannot be R. Joshua’s..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Chagigah

Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, they only stated “the other”, not a stranger’s118This refers to the statement that for sancta both hands have to be washed since otherwise one impure hand causes the other hand also to be impure. The problem is whether the other hand, which was not exposed to impurity, is impure in the second degree as impure hand, or of the third as derivative of second degree impurity. R. Simeon ben Laqish holds that it is impure in the third degree, R. Joḥanan that it is second.. Rebbi Joḥanan said, even a stranger’s. Rebbi Jeremiah, Rebbi Immi in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan, even a loaf. They said, Rebbi Joḥanan retracted this; when he said so it was before he changed his mind. He only said to make a loaf impure, because of “anything which disqualifies heave makes hands impure in the second degree.” Therefore to make a loaf impure everybody agrees that it does not make impure119For anything but the other hand of the person one follows the rule that induced impurity is one degree more than the inducing one. Therefore the second hand may disqualify a loaf of sancta but cannot possibly make it impure., since “no second degree creates second degree.116Mishnah Yadaim 3:2.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Versetto precedenteCapitolo completoVersetto successivo