Commento su Temurah 4:4
הַמַּפְרִישׁ חַטָּאתוֹ, וַהֲרֵי הִיא בַעֲלַת מוּם, מוֹכְרָהּ וְיָבִיא בְדָמֶיהָ אַחֶרֶת. רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר בְּרַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן אוֹמֵר, אִם קָרְבָה הַשְּׁנִיָּה עַד שֶׁלֹּא נִשְׁחֲטָה הָרִאשׁוֹנָה, תָּמוּת, שֶׁכְּבָר כִּפְּרוּ הַבְּעָלִים:
[Se] uno mette da parte il suo chattat , e diventa imperfetto , lo vende e porta un altro [ chattat ] con i suoi soldi; Il rabbino Elazar, figlio del rabbino Shimon, dice: se il secondo è stato offerto prima che il primo fosse macellato, è [appartato fino a quando] muore, poiché i proprietari hanno già espiato.
Bartenura on Mishnah Temurah
מוכרה ויביא בדמיה אחרת – for when he sold it (i.e., the sin-offering) to another, it is considered as if it doesn’t exist. But all the while that it is under its owner at the time that he is atoning with another [animal], it should die. But Rabbi Eleazar the son of Rabbi Shimon holds, that all the time that it is alive after the owners were expiated with another, whether it is under [the control of its owner] or in the hand of others, it should die. But the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Eleazar the son of Rabbi Shimon.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Temurah
Introduction
The final mishnah of our chapter has another case of a hatat that must be left to die.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Temurah
If one set aside a hatat and it is blemished, he sells it and brings another with its money. In this case he can’t sacrifice the first hatat because it is blemished. Therefore, he sells it and brings another with the proceeds.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Temurah
Rabbi Elazar son of Rabbi Shimon says: if the second animal was offered before the first was killed, it is left to die, since the owners have [already] obtained atonement. Rabbi Elazar son of Rabbi Shimon thinks that this too can become a case of a hatat left to die. Even though the original hatat was sold and now belongs to another person, if it is still alive when the second animal is offered, it still counts as a hatat whose owners had received atonement from another hatat and it too must be left to die. In other words, even though the first hatat wasn’t a “lost hatat” it still must be left to die if it is alive when the owners receive atonement.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy