Asham talui (un'offerta di colpa sospesa) [Le trasgressioni che, se commesse intenzionalmente, sono punibili da kareth e, se inconsapevolmente, richiedono un'offerta per il peccato fissa, richiedono per inconsapevolezza un asham talui, ad esempio, (se c'erano) due olive -dimensioni, uno di grassi proibiti e uno di grassi consentiti, e ne ha mangiato uno, ma non sa quale] — l'individuo e i Nassi sono responsabili, e il sacerdote unto e il beth-din sono esenti, [essendo scritto rispetto a un'offerta della congregazione (Levitico 4:14): "Se il peccato fosse conosciuto ... allora la congregazione offrirà, ecc. ". —richiedono un'offerta solo per conoscenza (e il sacerdote unto è come il beth-din)]. Una certa offerta di colpa [(Vi sono cinque offerte di colpa, che sono offerte per una certa trasgressione: asham me'iloth per abuso di proprietà sacre; asham gezeiloth per abuso di proprietà privata; asham nazir per l'interruzione del periodo del nazaritismo; asham metzora , l'offerta di colpa di un lebbroso; asham shifchah charufah per aver vissuto con una fanciulla promessa sposa di un altro uomo]—l'individuo, i Nassi e l'unto sacerdote sono responsabili; [per tutto ciò che riguarda l'individuo, che si tratti di una persona semplice, un sacerdote unto o un Nassi], e il beth-din sono esenti [poiché questi non hanno nulla a che fare con la sentenza del beth-din, e non c'è vergogna per la sentenza di beth-din.] Per "ascoltare la voce", "pronunciare con le labbra" e contaminare il santuario e le sue cose sante, beth-din è esente, e l'individuo, i Nassi e l'unto sacerdote sono responsabili ; ma il sacerdote unto non è responsabile della contaminazione del santuario e delle sue cose sante. Queste sono le parole di R. Shimon. [La logica di R. Shimon: è scritto rispetto alla contaminazione del santuario (Numeri 19:20): "E un uomo, se diventa impuro e non si purifica, quell'anima sarà tagliata fuori da mezzo della congregazione "—colui il cui peccato è equivalente a quello della congregazione, escluso il sommo sacerdote, il cui peccato non è equivalente a quello della congregazione. Per quanto riguarda la congregazione, chiunque di loro entri inconsapevolmente nel santuario o trasgredisca inconsapevolmente è responsabile della inconsapevolezza del solo atto, mentre il sacerdote unto è responsabile solo della dimenticanza della cosa (proibita) insieme alla inconsapevolezza dell'atto, come affermato sopra nel nostro capitolo.] Queste sono le parole di R. Shimon [L'halachah non è conforme a R. Shimon, ma un sommo sacerdote porta anche un'offerta su scala mobile per contaminare il santuario e le sue cose sante.] E quale offerta fanno portare? Un'offerta su scala mobile. R. Eliezer dice: I Nassi portano una capra per contaminare il santuario e le sue cose sante, perché sono responsabili nei confronti di Kareth per aver commesso la trasgressione, così come porta una capra per altri mitzvoth che sono responsabili nei confronti di Kareth per aver commesso la trasgressione . L'halachah non è in accordo con R. Eliezer, poiché poiché non sono in grado di portare un'offerta di peccato fissa per inconsapevole contaminazione del santuario e delle sue cose sante, i Nassi portano solo ciò che l'individuo porta.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Horayot
Asham talui – Commandments for which wilful transgressions receive the punishment of “karet” and accidental transgressions must bring a sin-offering, when there is doubt whether or not there was a transgression an asham talui must be brought, i.e. two amounts, one of forbidden fat and one of permissible fat and he does not know which one he ate.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Horayot
Introduction
Mishnah six compared the sin offerings offered for unwitting transgressions that the individual, the ruler, the high priest and the court bring. Mishnah seven compares these parties with regard to the asham talui (see above 2:4), the asham vadai and the sliding scale sacrifice (see above 2:5). An asham vadai is a guilt offering. There are five different situations in which a person must bring an asham vadai: 1) for robbery (Lev 5:21-25; 2) for illegal use of sacred property (Lev 5:14-16); 3) for relations with an betrothed slave woman (Lev 19:20-22); 4) a nazir (Num 6:9-12); 5) a leper (Lev 14:10-12).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Horayot
But the anointed priest and the court are exempt – As it is written about a communal sacrifice (Leviticus 4), “when the sin wherein they have sinned is known, then the assembly shall offer.” There is no obligation to bring a sacrifice unless the sin is clearly known. And the law for the high priest is like that for the beit din.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Horayot
The individual and the ruler are both obligated to bring an asham talui, but the anointed priest and the court are exempt. The individual and the ruler and the anointed priest are obligated to bring an asham vadai, but the court is exempt. For the hearing of the voice [of adjuration]; for an oath made by an expression, or for impurity relating to the Temple and its holy things, the court is not obligated but the individual, the ruler and the anointed priest are obligated. Except that the anointed priest is not liable for impurity relating to the Temple and its holy things; these are the words of Rabbi Shimon. What do they bring? A sliding scale sacrifice. With regard to the asham talui, the king is like any individual Israelite. If he may (or may not) have transgressed a commandment which is punishable by kareth, he brings an asham talui. However, the high priest and the court, if they made a ruling and they do not know if they erred, do not bring an asham talui. In other words, for the court or high priest to be liable for their errant ruling, it must be certain that they did so.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Horayot
Asham vadai – An asham vadai offering is required for five matters: for robbery (Leviticus 5:21-25); 2) for illegal use of sacred property (Leviticus 5:14-16); 3) for relations with a betrothed slave woman (Leviticus 19:20-22); 4) a nazir (Numbers 6:9-12); 5) a person who had tzara’at (Leviticus 14:10-12).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Horayot
Rabbi Eliezer says: the ruler brings a goat. All individuals, even a high priest, who unwittingly transgress one of the five commandments which are atoned for by an asham vadai, must bring the asham. However, if the court issues an errant ruling with regard to one of these commandments, and the people follow their errant ruling, the court does not bring an asham vadai, nor do they bring any sacrifice. They are liable to bring a bull as a sin offering only if they issue an errant ruling about a commandment punishable by kareth and atoned for by a sin offering (and not a guilt offering).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Horayot
The individual and the ruler and the anointed priest are obligated – Because each of these is the act of an individual. There is no difference between a layman, a high priest and a ruler.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Horayot
As we learned in mishnah five, if the court issues an errant ruling with regard to a commandment atoned for by a sliding scale sacrifice, they are not liable. If, however, if an individual, king or high priest were to transgress one of these commandments, he must bring a sliding scale sacrifice. The one exception is that the high priest is not obligated to bring a sliding scale sacrifice if he transgresses a commandment involving the purity of the Temple and its holy things. The mishnah now asks what type of sacrifice the king or the anointed priest brings should he transgress one of these commandments. According to the first opinion, they bring a sliding scale sacrifice, as do all regular Israelites. Rabbi Eliezer holds that the king brings a goat.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Horayot
But the court is exempt – Because a beit din ruling has no bearing on these acts. And the beit din does not bring an asham offering.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Horayot
Except that the anointed priest is not liable for impurity relating to the Temple and its holy things; these are the words of Rabbi Shimon – Rabbi Shimon’s meaning is that it is written “impurity relating to the Temple” (Numbers 19) and a person who is impure and transgresses, his soul will be cut off from the congregation. One who sins is equal to the congregation, but the high priest’s sin is not equal to the congregation. If any of the congregation accidentally transgresses by entering the Temple or transgressed accidentally, he is obligated only for the accidental transgression. The high priest is obligated only to bring a bull for an error-in-judgment (para ha’elem davar) sacrifice when he accidentally transgresses, as proven above. The law does not follow Rabbi Shimon’s opinion; rather, the high priest brings a sliding scale sacrifice even for impurity in the Temple and of its contents.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Horayot
Rabbi Eliezer says: the ruler brings a goat – For impurity in the Temple and of its contents, because wilful transgression of these is liable for “karet.” Just as the ruler brings a goat for transgression of other commandments for which the punishment is “karet.” The law does not follow Rabbi Eliezer’s opinion because there is no obligation to bring a sin-offering for accidental transgression of impurity in the Temple and the ruler brings a sacrifice in the same way as an individual.
