Mishnah
Mishnah

Commento su Besah 1:2

הַשּׁוֹחֵט חַיָּה וָעוֹף בְּיוֹם טוֹב, בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים, יַחְפֹּר בְּדֶקֶר וִיכַסֶּה, וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים, לֹא יִשְׁחֹט, אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן הָיָה לוֹ עָפָר מוּכָן מִבְּעוֹד יוֹם. וּמוֹדִים, שֶׁאִם שָׁחַט, שֶׁיַּחְפֹּר בְּדֶקֶר וִיכַסֶּה, שֶׁאֵפֶר כִּירָה מוּכָן הוּא:

Se uno volesse massacrare un animale o un uccello su yom tov [e si consiglia con beth-din], Beth Shammai dice: Dovrebbe scavare con un cervo e coprirlo (il sangue) [cioè Beth-din dirgli che lui può massacrarlo ab initio e scavare con un cervo bloccato (nel terreno) che aveva preparato prima (yom tov). Cioè, dovrebbe rimuoverlo dal suo posto, sollevando la terra mentre lo fa e coprire (il sangue) con quella terra. (L'istanza è quella in cui è bloccata nella terra umida, che è adatta per coprire (il sangue), non richiede di essere sbriciolata. ("Deker" :) una scelta, che è bloccata nella terra, come in (Numbers 28: 8): "E li ha trafitti (vayidkor) entrambi attraverso."] E loro (Beth Hillel) concordano sul fatto che se lo avesse (già) massacrato, avrebbe dovuto scavare con un cervo e coprirlo. E le ceneri di un le stufe sono "preparate" (muchan). [Questo non si riferisce all'istanza di Beth Hillel e Beth Shammai, ma è un'affermazione indipendente, vale a dire: le ceneri di una stufa sono "preparate" e non devono essere particolarmente mettere da parte, perché uno li ha in mente. E questo è così solo se fosse stato acceso alla vigilia di yom tov, ma se fosse stato acceso su yom tov, è vietato, non essendo probabile che avesse avuto il suo pensaci su di ieri e se sono sufficienti per la torrefazione di un uovo, ancora caldo, allora anche se fosse stato acceso su yom tov, è permesso coprirsi (il sangue) con loro. circa per th e arrostendo un uovo, può anche prenderli e usarli per coprire (il sangue).]

Bartenura on Mishnah Beitzah

השוחט חיה ועוף – he who comes to slaughters a wild beast or fowl and consults with the Jewish court how he should do it.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Beitzah

Introduction This mishnah deals with slaughtering animals on Yom Tov.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Beitzah

ב"ש אומרים – the Jewish court teaches him that ab initio, he should slaughter it with a mattock (i.e., a pronged tool) stuck in the ground that he prepared while it is still day (i.e., before the start of the Festival – see Talmud Betzah 7b) that is he should uproot it from the place where it is stuck into the ground and bring up dirt and cover it. For we are speaking that it is inserted in crushed/loose earth (see Talmud Betzah 8a) that is appropriate for covering, that is not lacking pounding/crushing.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Beitzah

He who slaughters a wild animal or a bird on a festival Bet Shammai says: he may dig with a pronged tool and cover up [the blood], but Bet Hillel says: he may not slaughter unless he has had earth made ready. According to Leviticus 17:13, when one slaughters an undomesticated animal or any type of fowl the blood must be poured out of the animal and covered with earth. One who slaughters an undomesticated animal or fowl on the festival has a problem. Although it is permitted to slaughter, if he doesn’t have any prepared earth to cover the blood newly dug earth is “muktzeh” and cannot be used. Nevertheless, Bet Shammai permits one to dig up new earth and cover the blood. Bet Hillel says one cannot slaughter unless one has earth already prepared.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Beitzah

דקר – a peg that we stick in the ground, and the language of the peg is (Numbers 25:8): “stabbed both of them.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Beitzah

But they agree that if he did slaughter he should dig with a pronged tool and cover up [the blood, and] that the ashes of a stove count as being prepared for the holiday. However, they all agree that if he had already slaughtered the animal, even though Bet Hillel says he should not have done so without already prepared earth, he may still dig new earth to cover the blood. This is because the principle of muktzeh is only rabbinically ordained and the obligation to cover the blood is Biblical. When one has two competing commandments, one rabbinic and one Biblical, the latter takes precedence. The two houses also agree that the ashes in the oven are considered prepared for the festival, in other words they are not muktzeh. Since people used these ashes for various purposes, we can make the assumption that before the festival began he knew in his mind that he would use these ashes.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Beitzah

שאפר כירה מוכן הוא – they do not refer to the words/matter of the School of Shammai and the School of Hillel, but it is an entirely separate matter, and this is how it should be understood – that the ashes of the oven should be made ready and that they do not need preparation/designation for a particular purpose that is mind is upon it, and they did not teach other than that which had been heated from the eve of the Festival, but that which was heated on the Festival is prohibited, for one cannot say that his thoughts were upon it from yesterday. For if it was appropriate to roast on it an egg, for it was yet hot ashes/embers, even though it was kindled on the Festival, it is permissible to cover it, for it is worthy of roast on it an egg, they take it also and cover [the blood] with it.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Versetto precedenteCapitolo completoVersetto successivo