Mishnah
Mishnah

Talmud sur Yadayim 3:2

כֹּל הַפּוֹסֵל אֶת הַתְּרוּמָה, מְטַמֵּא אֶת הַיָּדַיִם לִהְיוֹת שְׁנִיּוֹת. הַיָּד מְטַמְּאָה אֶת חֲבֶרְתָּהּ, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אֵין שֵׁנִי עוֹשֶׂה שֵׁנִי. אָמַר לָהֶם, וַהֲלֹא כִתְבֵי הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנִיִּים מְטַמְּאִין אֶת הַיָּדַיִם. אָמְרוּ לוֹ, אֵין דָּנִין דִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה מִדִּבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים, וְלֹא דִבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים מִדִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה, וְלֹא דִבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים מִדִּבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים:

Tout ce qui invalide la terumah [une portion de récolte qui doit être donnée à un prêtre, et qui ne peut être consommée que par les prêtres ou leur ménage] rend les mains d'un [degré] d'impureté secondaire. Une main rend son compagnon impur, selon le rabbin Yehoshua. Et les Sages disent: quelque chose [d'un] [degré d'impureté] secondaire ne peut pas rendre quelque chose [d'un] [degré d'impureté] secondaire. Il leur dit: Les écritures sacrées ne sont-elles pas [d'un] degré secondaire [d'impureté], et elles rendent les mains impures [avec un degré secondaire d'impureté] !? Ils lui ont dit: nous ne pouvons pas déduire les Paroles de la Torah [c'est-à-dire les lois de la Torah écrite] à partir des Paroles des savants [c'est-à-dire les lois de la Torah orale], ni les Paroles des savants des Paroles de la Torah, ni les Paroles des savants des paroles des savants.

Jerusalem Talmud Chagigah

“For heave, if one of his hands became impure the other remains pure.” “To make sancta impure, the words of Rebbi. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah says, to disqualify sancta.115Tosephta 3:10; Babli 24a. The text of the Tosephta is: A person who immerses one hand and prepares food in purity, any food prepared until he immerses the other hand is impure since one hand makes the other impure to make sancta impure …” The Tosephta implies that if one hand is impure, in preparation of sancta the other is impure in the second degree for Rebbi, in the third for R. Yose ben R. Jehudah.” How? Following Rebbi Joshua? As we have stated there116Mishnah Yadaim 3:2., “anything which disqualifies heave makes hands impure in the second degree, and one hand makes the other one impure, the words of Rebbi Joshua.” And Rebbi Joshua says more than Rebbi, since what Rebbi said refers to sancta, but Rebbi Joshua refers to heave117Therefore the Mishnah here which treats heave (disqualified by second degree impurity) more leniently than sancta (disqualified by third degree impurity) cannot be R. Joshua’s..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Chagigah

Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, they only stated “the other”, not a stranger’s118This refers to the statement that for sancta both hands have to be washed since otherwise one impure hand causes the other hand also to be impure. The problem is whether the other hand, which was not exposed to impurity, is impure in the second degree as impure hand, or of the third as derivative of second degree impurity. R. Simeon ben Laqish holds that it is impure in the third degree, R. Joḥanan that it is second.. Rebbi Joḥanan said, even a stranger’s. Rebbi Jeremiah, Rebbi Immi in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan, even a loaf. They said, Rebbi Joḥanan retracted this; when he said so it was before he changed his mind. He only said to make a loaf impure, because of “anything which disqualifies heave makes hands impure in the second degree.” Therefore to make a loaf impure everybody agrees that it does not make impure119For anything but the other hand of the person one follows the rule that induced impurity is one degree more than the inducing one. Therefore the second hand may disqualify a loaf of sancta but cannot possibly make it impure., since “no second degree creates second degree.116Mishnah Yadaim 3:2.”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Verset précédentChapitre completVerset suivant