Mishnah
Mishnah

Talmud sur Tohorot 8:9

מַקֵּל שֶׁהִיא מְלֵאָה מַשְׁקִין טְמֵאִין, כֵּיוָן שֶׁהִשִּׁיקָהּ לַמִּקְוֶה, טְהוֹרָה, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, עַד שֶׁיַּטְבִּיל אֶת כֻּלָּהּ. הַנִּצּוֹק וְהַקְּטַפְרֵס וּמַשְׁקֶה טוֹפֵחַ, אֵינָן חִבּוּר לֹא לַטֻּמְאָה וְלֹא לַטָּהֳרָה. וְהָאֶשְׁבֹּרֶן, חִבּוּר לַטֻּמְאָה וְלַטָּהֳרָה:

Un bâton qui est plein de liquide impur, une fois qu'il touche un mikva, il devient pur, selon le rabbin Yehoshua. Et les Sages disent: [il n'est pas rendu pur] tant qu'on ne plonge pas son intégralité. Une pluie [de liquides versés], ou [des liquides coulant vers le bas] une pente, ou un liquide dégoulinant [assez pour rendre quelque chose d'autre humide, mais pas assez pour, à son tour, mouiller autre chose], ceux-ci ne constituent pas une connexion pour impureté ou pour la pureté [c.-à-d. si une partie d'entre eux est rendue pure ou impure, cela n'affecte pas l'état de pureté du reste]. Mais une fosse [d'eau stagnante] constitue un lien pour l'impureté et pour la pureté.

Jerusalem Talmud Chagigah

There, we have stated200Mishnah Taharot 8:9.: “A staff which is full of impure fluids201Not that the staff contains fluid but that it is covered by fluid from top to bottom. If the staff touches the water, for R. Joshua all the fluid is connected to and becomes part of the 40 seah which purify., when it touched the miqweh it is pure, the words of Rebbi Joshua. But the Sages are saying, only if he immerses it completely.” Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, where do they disagree? For easy impurity; but for severe impurity184An easy impurity is one which is removed by immersion in a miqweh. A severe impurity needs some additional action, either a waiting period or a sacrifice to regain access to Temple and sancta. even Rebbi Joshua agrees. Rebbi Joḥanan said, they even disagree for severe impurity. A baraita disagrees with Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: “As long as his feet are in the water, he may consider himself pure for any stage he chooses.” Explain it about one who ate impure food and drank impure drinks202Whose impurity is rabbinic. Babli 18b.. Did not Rebbi Jacob bar Zavdi, Rebbi Abbahu say in the name of Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish, the body of one who ate impure food and drank impure drinks is pure without special intention203Unless the person has the intention of being pure for heave etc., he is biblically pure and, since in this instance his rabbinic disqualification is inactive, also rabbinically.? From the moment he intended elevated purity he (needs) [does not need] intention204The correction is unnecessary; once a higher level of purity is desired, no specific intention is needed to invalidate the prior immersion.. A Mishnah disagrees with Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish205Mishnah Miqwaot 7:6. Babli 19a.: “A miqweh containing exactly 40 seah into two persons descended, [both are pure]. One after the other, the first one is pure, the second impure206If the first one left the miqweh before the second entered, the water clinging to his body is missing in the miqweh which therefore cannot contain the full 40 seah needed to purify.. Rebbi Jehudah says, if the feet of the first touched the water, the second one also is pure207Following R. Joshua (Note 201)..” Still this is about one who ate impure food and drank impure drinks202Whose impurity is rabbinic. Babli 18b.. A baraita disagrees with Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish: A woman in her period may rinse a radish in a cave208Containing 40 seah of water and therefore being a natural miqweh. and it is pure. If she lifted it in any way out of the water it is impure. And we have stated thereto: Rebbi Jehudah declares it pure in the name of Rebbi Joshua209But for the Sages the radish remains pure only if at all times it is fully immersed.. And represents a menstruating woman not a severe impurity? This disagrees with Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish and it has no standing210There is no explaining away and R. Joḥanan’s opinion on the point of view of R. Joshua is proven..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Verset précédentChapitre completVerset suivant