Talmud sur Nedarim 11:8

הַמֻּדָּר הֲנָאָה מֵחֲתָנוֹ וְהוּא רוֹצֶה לָתֵת לְבִתּוֹ מָעוֹת, אוֹמֵר לָהּ, הֲרֵי הַמָּעוֹת הָאֵלּוּ נְתוּנִים לָךְ בְּמַתָּנָה וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא יְהֵא לְבַעְלֵךְ רְשׁוּת בָּהֶן, אֶלָּא מַה שֶּׁאַתְּ נוֹשֵׂאת וְנוֹתֶנֶת בְּפִיךְ:

Si un gendre avait juré de bénéficier de lui, et qu'il (le beau-père) voulait donner de l'argent à sa fille, il lui dit: "Prends cet argent comme cadeau, à condition que ton mari ait pas de droit, mais seulement dans ce que vous achetez et mettez dans votre bouche. " [Et sa condition demeure, et le mari ne l'acquiert pas. Et même si, au moyen de ce don, il le "sauve" de l'effort; car sa femme est nourrie par cet argent, et la nourrir était son obligation— "économiser de l'effort" n'est pas considéré comme "bénéfique".]

Jerusalem Talmud Nazir

HALAKHAH: “A woman who had made a vow of nazir,” etc. Does this mean it became holy by dedication⁷³Since in the absence of a contract to the opposite, all property of the wife’s is administered by her husband, how can the wife dedicate animals for her sacrifices without asking her husband to do it for her?? But if a third person gave her a gift and said, on condition that your husband have no right of disposition over it⁷⁴This is one scenario in which the husband has no say in what she does. (Cf. Nedarim 11:8, Notes 69–70; Babli 24b.), then it is hers. Rebbi Mattaniah said, if he gave her power over his properties⁷⁵The husband gives her the right to sign for everything concerning their properties. In this case, she is able to dedicate the animals but he retains veto power. In the scenario described in Note 63, he has no veto power.. If he comes to protest, it did not become holy; otherwise, it became holy.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Verset précédent Chapitre complet Verset suivant