Talmud sur Kil'ayim 1:9
הַטּוֹמֵן לֶפֶת וּצְנוֹנוֹת תַּחַת הַגֶּפֶן, אִם הָיוּ מִקְצָת עָלָיו מְגֻלִּין, אֵינוֹ חוֹשֵׁשׁ לֹא מִשּׁוּם כִּלְאַיִם, וְלֹא מִשּׁוּם שְׁבִיעִית, וְלֹא מִשּׁוּם מַעַשְׂרוֹת, וְנִטָּלִים בְּשַׁבָּת. הַזּוֹרֵעַ חִטָּה וּשְׂעוֹרָה כְּאַחַת, הֲרֵי זֶה כִלְאָיִם. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, אֵינוֹ כִּלְאַיִם, עַד שֶׁיְּהוּ שְׁנֵי חִטִּים וּשְׂעוֹרָה, אוֹ חִטָּה וּשְׁתֵּי שְׂעוֹרִים, אוֹ חִטָּה וּשְׂעוֹרָה וְכֻסָּמֶת:
Si l'on enterre [pour le stockage] des navets et des radis sous une vigne, si certaines des feuilles sont visibles, il n'a pas à se soucier de [transgresser les interdictions de] kilayim ou l'année sabbatique ou les dîmes; et ils peuvent être enlevés le Shabbat. Si l'on sème du blé et de l'orge [ensemble] à la fois, cela est considéré comme un kilayim ; Le rabbin Yehudah dit: ce n'est pas un kilayim , à moins qu'il n'y ait deux [grains] de blé et un [grain] d'orge ou un [grain de] blé et deux [grains] d'orge ou un grain [chacun] de blé, d'orge et orthographié.
Jerusalem Talmud Maasrot
Rebbi Joḥanan in the name of Rebbi Yannai: If a heap of onions produced roots, if one takes from them on the Sabbath he is free39While the onions are growing, taking them is not harvesting. since he does not want their growing roots. Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said to him: What is the worry40About the verb אכפל see H. L. Fleischer’s article in Levy’s Dictionary, vol. 2, p. 454. of Sabbath compared to tithes? Did we not state41Mishnah Kilaim 1:9, Notes 161–162; speaking of harvested vegetables stored in a pit and covered with loose earth.: “He does not have to worry either because of kilaim, or because of the Sabbatical year, or because of tithes, and they may be removed on the Sabbath.” Rebbi Zeїra said to Rebbi Abbahu: Look, what did he say! He said only, what is the worry of Sabbath compared to tithes? So he would worry about the Sabbatical for if he would like them to grow roots they would be forbidden42The next year if that happened to be a Sabbatical year. Cf. Kilaim 1:9, Note 166, that the Mishnah is accepted only for vegetables which did not grow new roots after being harvested. Therefore, the Mishnah there contradicts R. Joḥanan’s statement here. because of aftergrowth; otherwise they are permitted because of aftergrowth. Rebbi Maisha said to Rebbi Zeїra, is that the strongest? If he had stated about a single onion in the hand43The word יד “in the hand” is missing in the Rome ms. it would be fine44He certainly does not want to lose a whole heap but a single onion which grew new roots he might replant. If the statement had been about a single onion we could have inferred that there is a presumption that nobody wants harvested onions to start growing again (and wasting their bulbs) unless there is a clear indication to the contrary..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Sheviit
“Summer onions”, summer ones53The Aramaic trade name for the kind described in Hebrew in the Mishnah.. “They agree that one takes out madder growing on rocky slopes54Greek πέτρα “rock”.. We have stated on that55A similar statement is in Tosephta 5:23: “On does not tear out spontaneous growth of the Sabbatical with his hand but one ploughs as usual, as animals graze as usual.”: “At a place where one is used to plough, he may plough, to harrow, he may harrow56Under a regime of crop rotation, ploughing under the remains of the previous crop is only a preliminary step; it is not yet ploughing for a new crop and not under the prohibition of the Sabbatical. If it is a usual procedure, no bad impression will be created..”
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Jerusalem Talmud Beitzah
MISHNAH: A baby carriage is impure as support135Any implement used to sit or lay on becomes biblically impure if it supports a person impure by gonorrhea (Lev. 15:9,26) or menstruation (Lev. 20). This impurity is transmitted by the load; no direct contact is necessary. If the princess has her period, even if she touched only the uppermost of her ten mattresses, the entire bedstead is severely impure., may be used on the Sabbath, but is drawn136As the parallels in the Babli and the independent Mishnah mss. as well as logical necessity show, there is a word missing and one must read “but it is only d rawn on implements.” As the Halakhah explains, the Mishnah follows Rebbi Jehudah who holds that on the Sabbath and holidays one is liable also for unintended or undesirable effects of his action, in contrast to R. Simeon who holds liable only for prohibited actions whose prohibited effect was intended. The problem here is that drawing anything on a dirt floor will make a groove. Since pieces of dirt are moved to the side of the groove, this is forbidden digging. Therefore for R. Jehudah and his followers one may drag things on a floor only if the dirt is covered. on implements. Rebbi Jehudah said, no vessels are drawn except a carriage because it compresses140Under a wheel the dirt is moved only vertically, not horizontally, and this is missing an essential ingredient of biblically forbidden digging. .
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy