Mishnah
Mishnah

Commentaire sur Yevamot 5:3

נָתַן גֵּט וְעָשָׂה מַאֲמָר, צְרִיכָה גֵט וַחֲלִיצָה. נָתַן גֵּט וּבָעַל, צְרִיכָה גֵט וַחֲלִיצָה. נָתַן גֵּט וְחָלַץ, אֵין אַחַר חֲלִיצָה כְלוּם. חָלַץ וְעָשָׂה מַאֲמָר, נָתַן גֵּט, וּבָעַל, אוֹ בָעַל וְעָשָׂה מַאֲמָר, נָתַן גֵּט וְחָלַץ, אֵין אַחַר חֲלִיצָה כְלוּם. אַחַת יְבָמָה אַחַת לְיָבָם אֶחָד, וְאַחַת שְׁתֵּי יְבָמוֹת לְיָבָם אֶחָד:

S'il a donné un get et fait un ma'amar, elle a besoin d'un get et d'une chalitzah. [Car le get repousse un peu (le lien) et repart un peu, et le ma'amar acquiert ce qu'il lui reste. Par conséquent, elle a besoin d'un get pour sa ma'amar et sa chalitzah pour son lien (yibum).] S'il a donné un get et a cohabité avec elle, elle a besoin d'un get et chalitzah. [Il ne peut pas rester avec elle, car à partir du moment où il lui a donné le get, "qui ne voulait pas construire" obtient, de sorte qu'elle a besoin d'un get pour sa cohabitation et chalitzah pour son lien.] S'il lui a donné un get et chalitzah , il n'y a rien après la chalitzah. [Cette Mishnah est conforme à R. Akiva, qui dit que les fiançailles n'obtiennent pas avec ceux qui sont interdits par un commandement négatif. Mais ce n'est pas la halakha. La halakha est en accord avec les sages, qui disent qu'il y a quelque chose après la chalitzah, de sorte que s'il la fiance après la chalitzah, elle exige un obtenir de lui.] S'il lui a donné la chalitzah et a fait un ma'amar, ou (si il lui a donné une chalitzah et ensuite) lui a donné un get ou a cohabité avec elle, ou s'il a cohabité avec elle et lui a donné un ma'amar, ou (s'il cohabitait avec elle) et ensuite il lui a donné un get ou une chalitzah—il n'y a rien après la chalitzah. Il en est ainsi à la fois dans le cas d'un yevamah pour un yavam et dans le cas de deux yevamoth pour un yavam. [Ils sont les mêmes en ce qu'il y a quelque chose après le premier get ou après le premier ma'amar; et il n'y a rien après la cohabitation initiale ou après la chalitzah.]

Bartenura on Mishnah Yevamot

נתן גט ועשה בה מאמר צריכה גט וחליצה – that the Jewish bill of divorce supersedes part [of the marriage] and retains part, and the statement [of intention of marriage by a levir] acquires the remnant of the Jewish bill of divorce, therefore, she requires a Jewish bill of divorce for his (i.e., the levir’s) statement [of intention] and Halitzah for the levirate connection.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Yevamot

If the yavam gave her a get and then ma’amar, she needs [another] get and halitzah. As we learned above, only halitzah exempts the yevamah from her requirement for yibbum. When the yavam gave her a get, her ties to him were not completely severed. The only effect was that it was subsequently forbidden for him to have yibbum with her. When he then does ma’amar with her, she now requires another get in order to sever the ties created by this ma’amar. Finally, she still requires halitzah to sever the ties created by the need for yibbum.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Yevamot

נתן גט ובעל – it is prohibited to sustain her [in marriage] since from the time that he gave a Jewish bill of divorce , he fulfills, regarding her (Deuteronomy 25:9): “who will not build up [his brother’s house],” and she requires a Jeiwsh bill of divorce for his coition and Halitzah for the levirate connection.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Yevamot

If he gave her a get and then had intercourse with her, she needs [another] get and halitzah. In this case, after giving her the get, he has intercourse with her. This intercourse was forbidden, since she had already received a get. Therefore, since this was forbidden, it does not count as an act of yibbum. However, the mishnah teaches that it still has enough power to obligate him to give her another get, to sever the ties created by the intercourse [intercourse is one of the three means by which betrothals are contracted]. Finally, she still requires halitzah to sever the ties created by the need for yibbum.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Yevamot

אין לאחר חליצה כלום – This Mishnah is according to Rabbi Akiva, who stated, that Kiddushin/betrothal does not take effect with those who a liable for negative commandments, but it is not the Halakha. Rather, the Halakha is according to the Sages who state that there is nothing after Halitzah, and if he betrothed her after Halitzah, she requires from him a Jewish bill of divorce.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Yevamot

If he gave her a get and then did halitzah, there is nothing after halitzah. Here the mishnah teaches that once he has performed halitzah, she is totally free and there is no longer anything preventing her from marrying anyone else.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Yevamot

אחד יבמה אחת ליבם אחד ואחד שתי יבמות ליבם אחד – they are both equivalent for there is after the first Jewish bill of divorce or after the first statement [of intention of the Levir] nothing, but after the coition at the beginning, there is nothing, and there is nothing after Halitzah.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Yevamot

If the yavam did halitzah and then he did ma’amar or gave her a get, or had intercourse with her; Or if he had intercourse with her and then did ma’amar, or gave her a get, or did halitzah, there is nothing after halitzah. The first part of this section teaches that once he does halitzah, whatever he does afterwards, be it give her ma’amar, a get or have intercourse, does not count for anything. The halitzah severs all ties and anything done afterwards is inconsequential. The second part of this section teaches that just as there is no validity to anything after halitzah, so too there is no validity to anything after yibbum. For instance, were he to do halitzah after having already performed yibbum, the halitzah would be inconsequential. Of course, if he gives her a get after having done yibbum she is a divorcee, as is any wife who receives a divorce. The mishnah intends only to teach that yibbum turns a yevamah into a full wife and halitzah totally exempts her from any subsequent need for yibbum.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Yevamot

[And the law is the same] whether there is one yevamah to one yavam or two yevamoth to one yavam. With regard to all the combinations that we have been learning in the previous mishnayoth, it matters not whether they were done by one yavam with one yevamah or with two different yevamoth. The general rule is always true: there is “something” after a get and after ma’amar, and after halitzah and yibbum there is nothing. The following mishnayoth will continue to explain these complex possibilities.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Verset précédentChapitre completVerset suivant