Mishnah
Mishnah

Commentaire sur Ketoubot 7:9

הָאִישׁ שֶׁנּוֹלְדוּ בוֹ מוּמִין, אֵין כּוֹפִין אוֹתוֹ לְהוֹצִיא. אָמַר רַבָּן שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן גַּמְלִיאֵל, בַּמֶּה דְבָרִים אֲמוּרִים, בַּמּוּמִין הַקְּטַנִּים. אֲבָל בַּמּוּמִין הַגְּדוֹלִים, כּוֹפִין אוֹתוֹ לְהוֹצִיא:

Si un homme a des imperfections [après le mariage], nous ne le contraignons pas à l'envoyer. R. Shimon n. Gamliel a dit: Quand est-ce ainsi? Avec de petites imperfections. Mais avec de grandes imperfections [par exemple, si son œil était aveuglé ou si sa main était amputée, ou si son pied était cassé], il est obligé de la renvoyer. [La halakha n'est pas conforme à R. Shimon b. Gamliel, et même avec de grosses imperfections, nous ne l’obligeons pas à la renvoyer.]

Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot

שנולדו בו מומין – from when he married her.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Ketubot

Introduction Up until now the mishnah has been discussing physical flaws found in a wife, which cause the marriage to either be annulled or her husband to be allowed to divorce her without paying the ketubah. Just in case you thought that men were physically perfect, the last two mishnayoth of our chapter discuss physical flaws found in a man, that force him to divorce his wife and pay her the ketubah.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot

מומין גדולים – his eye became blinded, his hand was mutilated, his leg was broken, but the Halakha is not according to Rabban Shimon ben Gamaliel and even with large blemishes, we don’t force him to divorce [her].
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Ketubot

A man in whom defects have arisen [after marriage] cannot be forced to divorce [his wife]. Rabban Shimon ben Gamaliel said: To what does this apply: to minor defects, but with regard to major defects he can be forced to divorce her. If a woman marries a man and she finds that he has physical flaws that existed before the marriage and that he did not tell her about them, she can compel him to divorce her and pay her the ketubah. If she knew about them (or they were clearly noticeable and therefore should have known about them), and she married him in any case, she cannot later complain about them and use them as grounds for divorce. Furthermore, if new defects arise after the marriage, she cannot force him to divorce her. Rabban Shimon ben Gamaliel says that the above is only true if the defect is small. If the defect which arises after marriage is large, he must divorce her. According to the Talmud’s explanation of Rabban Shimon ben Gamaliel, if the defects are significant, she can force a divorce even if she knew about them before the marriage, for she can say that she thought that they wouldn’t disturb her but now they do.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Verset précédentChapitre completVerset suivant