Talmud sobre Yoma 4:7

Rav Jehudah in the name of Samuel⁵⁰If the reading of B were “Rav Huna in the name of Samuel”, it would need consideration as lectio difficilior. But since it is the impossible “Rav Huna in the name of Rebbi Samuel”, it has to be disregarded. ג is defective at this place. In the Babli Ketubot106a the statement is attributed to Rav Giddul in the name of Rav.: The scholars who teach the priests the rules of slaughter, rules of receiving, rules of sprinkling, take their wages from the disbursement from the lodge⁵¹Since every week another group of Cohanim comes to serve, which may bring with them young inexperienced members of the group, they are permanently occupied. Babli Ketubot106a.. Rebbi Isaac bar Redifa in the name of Immi: The inspectors of defects of sancta⁵²Since the animals chosen for the daily sacrifice have to be without defects (Num.28:3), there have to be competent daily inspections. Babli Ketubot106a. take their wages from the disbursement from the lodge. Rebbi Aḥa, Rebbi Tanḥum bar Ḥiyya in the name of Rebbi Simlai: Those who correct the scroll of the Temple courtyard⁵³From which the High Priest reads on the Day of Atonement and which is used to standardize the texts of copies of the Torah. The reading of B, “Ezra’s scroll”, has to be rejected. Babli Ketubot106a. take their wages from the disbursement from the lodge. Giddul bar Benjamin in the name of Assi: The two judges of robberies⁵⁴This is the translation of the text here and in Mishnah Ketubot13:1. But it seems that the meaning of the term is that of the reading of ג and most Babylonian sources here and in Ketubot13, דַּיָנֵי גְזֵירוֹת “judges of decisions,” i. e., appeals judges. The reading here is the result of an exchange of liquids. The legal principles attributed to these judges in Ketubot Chapter 13 all refer to matters of civil, mostly matrimonial, law. Babli Ketubot105a. take their wages from the disbursement from the lodge. Samuel said, women who are weaving the gobelins⁵⁵For use in the Temple Hall, to separate between the holy and the holiest of holies. take their wages from the disbursement from the lodge; Rav Ḥuna said, from disbursements for repair of the House. How do they disagree? Samuel makes it a sacrifice, Rav Huna makes it part of the building. Rebbi Ḥizqiah said that Rebbi Jehudah Dried Figs⁵⁶It is impossible to determine his time of activity. stated: The incense and all public sacrifices come from the disbursement from the lodge. The golden altar and vessels for the Service come from the excess of libations⁵⁷This statement endorses the position of R. Ismael in the Mishnah, that the operation to provide wine, oil, and flour to those who bring private sacrifices, routinely provides a surplus to the Temple.. The altar for elevation sacrifices, the building, and the courtyards⁵⁷This statement endorses the position of R. Ismael in the Mishnah, that the operation to provide wine, oil, and flour to those who bring private sacrifices, routinely provides a surplus to the Temple. come from the leftover in the lodge. The outside of the courtyards come from the lodge for maintenance of the House⁵⁹The place where the funds are kept which were given as vows to the Temple.. But was it not stated: One commits me`ilah with stones of the Temple or the courtyards<sup>60</sup>Me`ilah is defined (Lev. 5:15) as “larceny committed on the Eternal’s sancta”, where the usual interpretation is that sancta are only sacrifices and their appurtenances; cf. Halakhah 3:4, Note 66.. How can one commit me`ilah with leftovers? But it must follow Rebbi Meïr, for Rebbi Meïr said, one commits me`ilah with leftovers. Rebbi Ḥinena said, Rebbi Meïr said this only during its year. But here we are after its year⁶¹Money is a sanctum whose misuse is me`ilah only if there is the possibility that it will be used to buy sacrifices. As explained earlier, any leftovers after disbursement still must be kept together since they might be needed if the money disbursed later was not sufficient for the Temple’s needs. But once a new year started, the old sheqalim cannot be used to buy sacrifices of any kind; they cannot cause me`ilah. The baraita is rejected. Babli Qiddušin54a..

HALAKHAH: “Ten cubits’ distance from the place of stoning,” etc. You find that when Achan stole from the ban, Joshua started supplicating before the Holy One, praise to Him, and said: Master of the Universe, inform me who is the man. The Holy One, praise to Him, answered: I never publicize any creature. In addition, would I not be guilty of slander²⁸Babli 11a, 43b. An expanded version in Tanhuma Masˋe 5.? But go and let Israel stand up by its tribes and throw lots, then immediately I shall draw him out. That is what is written: Joshua got up early in the morning and summoned Israel by its tribes. Achan ben Karmi ben Zeraḥ from the tribe of Jehudah was caught²⁹Jos. 7:16.. Achan told him, how? Do you catch me by lots³⁰The entire procedure described in Jos. 7:16–26 cannot be justified either in pentateuchal or in rabbinic law.? There is nobody more pious in the present generation than you or Phineas. Let lots be thrown between you, certainly³¹Greek πάντως. The outcome of drawing of lots is essentially predetermined by the set from which the lot is drawn. one of you will be caught. Not only this, but your teacher Moses died only 30 or 40 days ago. Did not our teacher Moses instruct us: By the testimony of two witnesses³²Deut. 19:15.? You started erring. At that moment did Joshua have a vision by the holy spirit how he distributes the Land to Israel by lots. That is what is written: Joshua threw lots for them³³Jos. 18:10.. This means, we are giving lots a bad name. Not only this, but if lots are confirmed now, all of Israel will say, since the lots were true in criminal matters, so much more in money matters. But if they are repudiated now, all of Israel will say, since the lots were repudiated in criminal matters, so much more in money matters. At that moment, Joshua started supplicating Achan, entreated him in the name of Israel’s God, and said to him: my son, honor the Eternal,the God of Israel, … Achan answered Joshua and said, in fact²⁶Jos. 7:19–20.. What means אָמְנָה? Truth³⁴Deriving אמנה from the root אמן.. I sinned against the Eternal, God of Israel. He told him, I asked you for one and you are answering me two³⁵Referring to the doubling such and such in v. 7:20.? he answered, I stole from the ban of Midian and the ban of Jericho. Rebbi Tanḥuma said, he stole from four bans: The ban of the Phoenician, king of Arad, the ban of Siḥon and Og, the ban of Midian, the ban of Jericho. From where that his confession atoned for him? It is said³⁶The assassin of king Ela, 1K. 16:10. In Jos. 7:19, the son of Zerah and father of Carmi is called Zavdi, not Zimri. This underlies the talmudic doctrine that all of Chronicles is to be explained alegorically., the sons of Zeraḥ: Zimri and Ethan, etc. Rebbi Joshua ben Levi said, Zimri is Achan who behaved like Zimri³⁷The assassin of king Ela, 1K. 16:10. In Jos. 7:19, the son of Zerah and father of Carmi is called Zavdi, not Zimri. This underlies the talmudic doctrine that all of Chronicles is to be explained alegorically.. Rebbi Samuel bar Naḥman said, Heman³⁸Aramaic הֵימָן is Hebrew נֶאֱמָן, cf. Note 34. that is Achan, omna I sinned. Altogether five. Did I not know that they were five³⁹Since the verse enumerates five sons of Zerah.? But it teaches that Achan also has part in the World to Come⁴⁰Since he is counted together with Ethan and Heman, the composers of psalms. Tosephta 9:5..

Solomon made ten candelabra, [as it is said]¹²³Corrector’s insert following B., he made the ten candelabra according to its rules¹²⁴2 Chr. 4:7. In the other two sources correctly “their rules”, and they add the end of the verse, to which the next argument refers: and put them in the Temple Hall, five to the right and five to the left. Cf. Babli Menaḥot98b–99a.. If you would say, five to the North and five to the South, but the candelabrum is only qualified in the South, as it is said, and the candelabrum opposite the table on the South side¹¹⁶Ex. 26:35.. Why does the verse say, five to the right and five to the left? Five to the right of Moses’s candelabrum, and five to its left. Nevertheless, only Moses’s alone was kindled, as it is said¹²⁵2 Chr.13:11, showing actual practice.\, and the golden candelabrum and its lights to kindle evening by evening. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah says, all of them were kindled, for it is said¹²⁶2 Chr. 4:20–21., the candelabra and their lights, to kindle them regularly in the Temple Hall, closed gold¹²⁷Cf. Yoma4:4, Note 101., and the flower¹²⁸According to Rashi, the ornament of the candelabrum mentioned in Num. 8:4 but not in the original instructions, Ex. 25:31–40., and the lights, and the pincers of gold, this uses up the gold. These used up Solomon’s gold. Rav Jehudah in the name of Assi¹²⁹In B a Tannaitic text, a statement of R. Jehudah in the name of Issy.: Solomon took 1’000 talents of silver, put them repeatedly into the (fire) [smelting furnace]¹³⁰The scribe’s text (in parentheses) is confirmed by the Genizah text; the corrector’s [in brackets] is from B. until they were reduced to one, to fulfill what is written¹³¹Ex. 37:24., from one talent of pure gold he made it. It was stated, Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah said, ¹³²The following is from Yoma4:4, Notes 107–108. it happened that the golden candelabrum which Moses made in the desert was in excess of one gold denar, and they returned it to the fire eighty times and it did not lose anything¹³³This seems to contradict the preceding story of Solomon’s refining smelter.. This is correct. Before it is refined it loses a lot, once it is refined it will not miss anything.

All letters written with the Name as prefix are profane and may be erased, e. g., to the Eternal, by the Eternal, as the Eternal, that the Eternal, since we find that on the diadem it was separate from it, “holy to” at the bottom, “the Eternal” at the top³⁹⁰Yoma4:1 Note 27; Babli Šabbat 63b, Sukkah 5a. For the following, Ševuot 35b.. All letters written with the Name as suffix are holy and may not be erased, e. g., our God, your God. These are the Names which may not be erased: one who writes the Name of four letters, whether YH or AD³⁹¹The Name אֲדֹנָי used as pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton. If the intention is to אֲדֹנַי “my masters”, the word is profane and may be erased.. “El, Elohim, Elohei, Elohenu, Elohekhem, Shadday, Sabaoth, Ehye-Ašer-Ehye.” If one writes AD from Adonai, EH from Ehye, ŠD from Shadday, ṢB from Sabaoth, these may be erased and one erases their additions³⁹²אֵד “vapor”, אַה has no sense, שַׁד “female breast” שֶׁד “spirit”, צָב “turtle” are profane words.. “To Elohim” one erases “to”; “to the Eternal” one erases “to”³⁹³As noted at the start of the paragraph.. If he wrote YH³⁹⁴Which is a divine Name in its own right and should have been mentioned in the list. of the four-letter Name, EL from Elohim, it may not be erased. This is the rule: Any which at another place is a permanent Name may not be erased.