Talmud sobre Makot 1:2

מְעִידִין אָנוּ בְאִישׁ פְּלוֹנִי שֶׁחַיָּב לַחֲבֵרוֹ מָאתַיִם זוּז, וְנִמְצְאוּ זוֹמְמִין, לוֹקִין וּמְשַׁלְּמִין, שֶׁלֹּא הַשֵּׁם הַמְבִיאוֹ לִידֵי מַכּוֹת, מְבִיאוֹ לִידֵי תַשְׁלוּמִין, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי מֵאִיר. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, כָּל הַמְשַׁלֵּם אֵינוֹ לוֹקֶה:

(Si los testigos dicen :) Testificamos sobre ese hombre que le debe a su vecino doscientos zuz, y que se descubrió que eran zomemin, reciben franjas y pagan. Porque no es el verso lo que lo pone a uno en franjas, lo que lo hace pagar. [Franjas, de (Éxodo 20:13): "No testificarás contra tu prójimo falso testimonio"; pago, de "Entonces le harás lo que él planeó". Estas son las palabras de R. Meir. Los sabios dicen: El que paga no recibe franjas, [está escrito (Deuteronomio 25: 2): "según su maldad"—Por una maldad lo haces responsable, y no por dos. Y dado que los rabinos dicen que paga y no recibe franjas, y no que recibe franjas y no paga, inferimos que donde haya dos, franjas y pago, no decimos que reciba franjas y no paga, pero que paga y no recibe rayas. Y esta es la halajá.]

Jerusalem Talmud Sheviit

Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun in the name of Rav: If somebody gives a loan to a person on condition that the Sabbatical not remit it, the Sabbatical does not remit⁶²In the Babli (Makkot 3b), Samuel is reported to have declared that the Sabbatical will remit. In the end, a fine distinction is made in the wording. If the contract reads that the debtor will not enforce the remission, that condition is valid. But if the contract reads that the Sabbatical should have no influence, that would mean abrogating a Torah law and the condition is invalid., as we have stated⁶³Mishnah Makkot 1:2, dealing with witnesses who falsely testify that a debtor has promised to pay within 30 days when in fact he is obligated to pay after ten years, they are sentenced to pay the present value of the debt due in ten years.: “Whether he gives it after thirty days or after ten years.” Are there ten years without a Sabbatical? Rav Huna said, Rav Naḥman bar Jacob and Rav Sheshet disagreed. One of them said, if the loan was given on a pledge⁶⁴As noted in the Mishnah. In the Babli, this explanation is attributed to the later Amora Rava., but the other said, if he writes him a prozbol⁶⁵Explained in the next Mishnah, cf. Note 80..

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Versículo anterior Capítulo completo Versículo siguiente