Talmud sobre Guitín 5:5

הֵעִיד רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן בֶּן גֻּדְגְּדָה עַל הַחֵרֶשֶׁת שֶׁהִשִּׂיאָהּ אָבִיהָ, שֶׁהִיא יוֹצְאָה בְגֵט. וְעַל קְטַנָּה בַת יִשְׂרָאֵל שֶׁנִּשֵּׂאת לְכֹהֵן, שֶׁאוֹכֶלֶת בַּתְּרוּמָה, וְאִם מֵתָה, בַּעְלָהּ יוֹרְשָׁהּ. וְעַל הַמָּרִישׁ הַגָּזוּל שֶׁבְּנָאוֹ בַבִּירָה, שֶׁיִּטֹּל אֶת דָּמָיו, מִפְּנֵי תַקָּנַת הַשָּׁבִים. וְעַל חַטָּאת הַגְּזוּלָה שֶׁלֹּא נוֹדְעָה לָרַבִּים, שֶׁהִיא מְכַפֶּרֶת, מִפְּנֵי תִקּוּן הַמִּזְבֵּחַ:

R. Yochanan b. Gudgeda testificó que un sordomudo cuyo padre se casó con ella se divorció. [A pesar de que era una mujer casada de buena fe, su padre había aceptado su compromiso cuando era menor de edad, aun así, se le da un recibo, y recibe su recibo cuando es sorda, a pesar de que falta su consentimiento . Para una mujer puede ser divorciada forzosamente, por lo que no se requiere su consentimiento.]; y que la hija menor de un israelita [un huérfano, cuyo matrimonio es sancionado rabínicamente (y no escrituralmente)] come terumah [terumah mandado rabínicamente, esto no se decreta en contra de (por la posibilidad de que venga a comer) terumah mandado escrituralmente ]; y que si ella muere, su esposo la hereda; y que si uno construye una viga que había robado en un edificio, el reembolso monetario es suficiente [por el bien del penitente; porque si se le exigiera arrasar su edificio y devolver la viga, se disuadiría de arrepentirse.]; y que una ofrenda por el pecado robada, que no era conocida por muchos [como robada] expiaciones [y otra no necesita ser traída], para "el bien del altar", [para que los Cohanim no se angustien por (el pensamiento de ) habiendo comido chullin (comida no consagrada) de (un animal) sacrificado en la azarah (la corte del Templo) y el altar estaba "desierto", los Cohanim se abstuvieron de realizar el servicio (de sacrificio).]

Jerusalem Talmud Bava Kamma

HALAKHAH: “One who robbed wood and turned it into utensils,” etc. Here⁴Tosephta 10:2 states that raw wool that was bleached does not have to be returned; only its value as raw wool has to be paid. Babli 93b., you say that bleaching is a change, and there⁵The Mishnah, which says that only turning wool into a garment is a change by which the robber becomes the owner; this implies that cleaning, spinning, and dying the wool prior to weaving is not a change which absolves the robber from returning the wool as is. you say that bleaching is not a change. If you say that bleaching is a change, if he made it into wool flakes⁶Arabic صوفة, Samaritan Aramaic צוף. The wool flakes can be used to stuff pillows; they cannot be spun into thread. The robber changed raw material into a finished product.. If you say that bleaching is not a change, if he left it unchanged. We find bleaching without flakes. Are there flakes without bleaching⁷At least the raw wool has to be washed before being turned into flakes.? Rebbi Yudan said, it is a leniency instituted for the robber that he pay their value at the time of the robbery⁸Since robbers, in contrast to thieves, are known, it should be made easy for them to return the robbed goods and avoid prosecution. This is the position of the House of Hillel as explained in the next paragraph. The Mishnah represents the teaching of the House of Hillel.. If somebody robbed raw hide and cleaned it, can you say that he turned it into flakes⁹Nonetheless, he only owes the value of the hide and cannot be forced to return it as is.? Again it is a leniency instituted for the robber that he pay the value at the time of the robbery.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Yevamot

MISHNAH: Rebbi Joḥanan ben Nuri said, why can a deaf-mute woman be divorced but a deaf-mute man cannot divorce? They told him, a divorcing man is not comparable to a divorced woman since a woman can be divorced with or against her will²⁰By talmudic standards. By an institution of R. Gershon ben Jehudah (Mayence, about the year 1000), European Jews were forbidden to divorce without the wife’s consent (except in cases where the law forces the husband to divorce). but a man divorces only by his own will²¹If the court coerces a recalcitrant husband to give a divorce, they have to coerce him “until he says, I want to do it.”.
Rebbi Joḥanan ben Gudgada²²A Tanna, about one generation older than R. Joḥanan ben Nuri. His testimony is also in Mishnah Idiut 7:9, Giṭṭin 5:5. testified about a deaf-mute girl who was married off by her father²³When she was a minor and was passive in the marriage. She is married by biblical standards. that she could be divorced by a bill of divorce. They said to him²⁴To R. Joḥanan ben Nuri, that in principle, the biblical marriage of an incompetent person can be dissolved by divorce., that is an example.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Bava Kamma

Rebbi Yudan did not go to the house of assembly. He met Rebbi Mana and asked him, what was new for you in the house of study today? He told him, such and such a subject. He replied, is that not a Mishnah, “heave and it became impure”? He replied, explain it if it became impure by itself⁴⁴For example, if a dead reptile was found in the utensil containing the heave. Then it implies nothing about the status of the object if the robber caused the change. and you cannot infer anything.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Versículo anterior Capítulo completo Versículo siguiente