Talmud zu Terumot 4:3

שִׁעוּר תְּרוּמָה, עַיִן יָפָה, אֶחָד מֵאַרְבָּעִים. בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים, מִשְּׁלֹשִׁים. וְהַבֵּינוֹנִית, מֵחֲמִשִּׁים. וְהָרָעָה, מִשִּׁשִּׁים. תָּרַם וְעָלָה בְיָדוֹ אֶחָד מִשִּׁשִּׁים, תְּרוּמָה, וְאֵינוֹ צָרִיךְ לִתְרֹם. חָזַר וְהוֹסִיף, חַיָּב בְּמַעַשְׂרוֹת. עָלָה בְיָדוֹ מִשִּׁשִּׁים וְאֶחָד, תְּרוּמָה, וְיַחֲזֹר וְיִתְרֹם כְּמוֹת שֶׁהוּא לָמוּד, בְּמִדָּה וּבְמִשְׁקָל וּבְמִנְיָן. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, אַף שֶׁלֹּא מִן הַמֻּקָּף:

Die Menge an Terumah : Eine faire [großzügige Menge]: eine von vierzig. Beit Shammai sagt: von dreißig. Der Durchschnitt [Betrag]: von fünfzig. Ein geiziger [Betrag]: von sechzig. Wenn er Terumah beiseite legte und feststellte, dass es nur einer von sechzig war, [ist es gültig] Terumah und er braucht Terumah nicht beiseite zu legen . Wenn er zurückgeht und [mehr Terumah ] hinzufügt , erfordert [der zusätzliche Betrag] den Zehnten. Wenn er feststellte, dass es nur einer von fünfundsechzig Terumah war, muss er Terumah gemäß seiner gewohnten Praxis in Maß, Gewicht oder Anzahl wieder beiseite legen . Rabbi Yehudah sagt: [er darf] sogar [ Terumah beiseite legen ], nicht aus der Umgebung [produzieren].

Jerusalem Talmud Demai

HALAKHAH: Rebbi Eleazar⁵¹The paragraph does not belong here but in Terumot 2:4, where the text is identical except for בטילה instead of בטיבולה. The Mishnah in Terumot assumes that somebody gives a seah to a Levite and a seah to the poor; according to R. Meïr then he, or his worker, can eat eight seah based on the tithes he gave. The Sages permit only to eat according to the percentage of the tithe that still exists. Maimonides and R. Simson give two possible interpretations, one that the Mishnah there is a corollary to the Mishnah here and deals with a worker who receives food from his employer and sees the employer give to the Levite and the poor but does not know whether he gave as tithes or as gifts. R. Hoshaiah declares that the position of the Sages in that Mishnah is identical with the position of the Tanna in our Mishnah. in the name of Rebbi Hoshaiah: They considered him a worker who does not trust his employer. The following is obvious: If the produce was burned, the heave is ṭevel⁵²Since heave is taken to permit the rest to be eaten, if nothing can be eaten there is no heave, and heave and tithes have to be separated anew from the remainder. This refers to the case where the produce burned before the heave was delivered to the Cohen. If the heave burned after he declared it, the farmer did his duty.. If the heave is burned, when the produce is eaten the heave will have been sanctified retroactively.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Vorheriger Vers Ganzes Kapitel Nächster Vers