Mischna
Mischna

Talmud zu Meilah 4:5

כָּל הָאֳכָלִין מִצְטָרְפִין, לִפְסוֹל אֶת הַגְּוִיָּה בְכַחֲצִי פְרָס, בִּמְזוֹן שְׁתֵּי סְעֻדּוֹת לָעֵרוּב, בְּכַבֵּיצָה לְטַמֵּא טֻמְאַת אֳכָלִין, בְּכַגְּרוֹגֶרֶת לְהוֹצָאַת שַׁבָּת, בְּכַכּוֹתֶבֶת בְּיוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים. כָּל הַמַּשְׁקִין מִצְטָרְפִין, לִפְסוֹל אֶת הַגְּוִיָּה בִרְבִיעִית, וּבִמְלֹא לֻגְמָיו בְּיוֹם הַכִּפּוּרִים:

Alle Lebensmittel machen zusammen einen Körper ungültig, [wenn einer konsumiert wird] in einer Menge, die einer halben Hälfte eines Brotlaibs entspricht. [so auch] die Menge an Nahrung, die für zwei Mahlzeiten für einen Eruv benötigt wird [eine halachische Verschmelzung getrennter Domänen durch Ablegen einer Menge an Nahrung an einem bestimmten Ort]; [so] die Größe eines Eies, um Nahrungsmittelunreinheiten [auf andere Dinge] zu übertragen; die Größe einer trockenen Feige, um eine für die Durchführung am Schabbat haftbar zu machen; die Größe eines [großen] Datums, um 0ne für [für das Essen auf] Yom Kippur haftbar zu machen. Alle Flüssigkeiten verbinden sich, um den Körper mit einem Revi'it [spezifische Volumeneinheit] ungültig zu machen ; und die "wangenreiche" Größe, um einen für Jom Kippur haftbar zu machen.

Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat

HALAKHAH: 7. “A potsherd (of any size) to put between one half brick,”121 etc. Rebbi Joḥanan said, one may use it to sanctify; Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish says, one may not use it to sanctify. Rebbi Eleazar asked, in Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish’s opinion, why may one not use it to sanctify? Because it is impervious to impurity 122By definition, a vessel is a product of manufacture. Materials in their original state always are impervious to impurity (unless they are derived from animals). A first tentative opinion is that “vessel” is only a manufactured product susceptible to impurity.. But are not vessels made of cow dung, stone vessels, earthen vessels impervious to impurity and one may use them to sanctify123Mishnah Parah 5:5.! But because it does not contain a quartarius124Which everywhere is the minimum of a substantial volume of fluid.. But does not Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish agree that one may sanctify using an arbitrarily small complete clay vessel? It is that the only reason is that it does not have the appellation “vessel”125Which is required by the verse and, therefore, cannot be dispensed with.. Then it is difficult for Rebbi Joḥanan. It is not enough to disqualify the body126Mishnah Meˋilah 4:5 states that ingesting a quartarius of impure fluid disqualifies a body from any activity requiring purity. It is difficult to see why this should be relevant to the topic at hand. S. Liebermann, following Noˋam Yerushalaim of R. Joshua Eizik of Slonim, suggests to change “body” into “miqweh”. The argument for this is that a miqweh may not be filled with water drawn by a vessel; in this context a “clay vessel” is defined by Mishnah Miqwa’ot 4:3 as one which may contain a minimum volume of one quartarius. but one may use it to sanctify? But this follows Rebbi Yose, for “Rebbi Yose said, also the most minute amount of clay vessel127In Mishnah Miqwa’ot 4:3 he states that a clay vessel of any size is a “vessel”; the criterion of one quartarius applies only to potsherds..” Did not Rebbi Yose say this only for a complete one, and do we not deal here with a broken one? What Rebbi Ḥiyya stated128Tosephta Kelim Bava qamma 7:17. supports Rebbi Joḥanan; what Rebbi Simeon ben Yoḥai129This baraita has not come down to us. stated supports Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Vorheriger VersGanzes KapitelNächster Vers