Wenn seine Frau eine Fehlgeburt hatte [und er nicht wusste, ob es eine Lebendgeburt war oder nicht], wird er kein Nazirit. [Unsere Mischna stimmt mit R. Yehudah überein, der sagt, dass "man sich nicht in eine Position des Zweifels versetzt", so dass er, als er sagte: "Wenn ich einen Valad habe", ein bestimmtes (dh Leben) meinte. valad.] R. Shimon sagt: Er muss sagen: "Wenn ich leben würde, wäre ich ein Nazirit aus Pflicht; wenn nicht, wäre ich ein Nazirit aus Wahl. [R. Shimon hält das in einem Fall von Zweifel, ob einer ist oder ist kein Nazirit, muss die strenge Option befolgt werden. Daher muss er "im Zweifel ein Nazirit" sein und festlegen: "Wenn es lebendig wäre, wäre ich ein Nazirit aus Verpflichtung; wenn nicht, bin ich ein Nazirit durch Wahl "; und er rasiert sich und bringt seine Opfergaben am Ende von dreißig Tagen. Ohne diese Bestimmung könnte er kein Opfer im Zweifel bringen. Die Halacha stimmt nicht mit R. Shimon überein.] Wenn sie später geboren hat, wird er ein Nazirit, [nachdem er den Naziritismus wegen einer Fehlgeburt nicht beobachtet hat. Und jetzt, wo sie ein lebendes Kind geboren hat, tritt der Naziritismus in Kraft.] R. Shimon sagt: Er muss sagen: "Wenn der erste lebendig wäre dann war die erste Verpflichtung, und dies, Wahl; und wenn nicht, war die erste Wahl und diese Verpflichtung. "[Nach R. Shimon ist es notwendig, erneut zu vereinbaren, denn die erste war möglicherweise live.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Nazir
הפילה אשתו – and he did not know if he was a living being or aborted/non-viable birth.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Nazir
Introduction
This mishnah is a continuation of yesterday’s mishnah where a man vowed to be a nazirite if he had a child. Our mishnah deals with a case where his wife miscarries. The question is, do we consider the miscarriage to be a case where the child was viable while in the womb, and hence he had a child or not.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Nazir
אינו נזיר – our Mishnah is [according to] Rabbi Yehuda who said that a person does not place down his soul on a doubt and if he states “when I will have a child,” he is speaking about a definitive child.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Nazir
If his wife miscarries, he does not become a nazirite. Rabbi Shimon says: [in this case] he should say, “If it was a viable child, behold, I am a nazirite from obligation; otherwise behold, I am a voluntary nazirite.” According to the first opinion, if his wife miscarries he is not a nazirite. Although there is some doubt that the child might have reached viability before the miscarriage, in cases of doubtful naziriteships the ruling is lenient. Rabbi Shimon is more concerned with the possibility that the child reached viability. Therefore, the one who vowed is considered a doubtful nazirite. The way that one observes this doubtful naziriteship is by saying that if the child was viable, then he is now serving a mandatory naziriteship. If, however the child was not viable, then his naziriteship is just from doubt. In any case, he must observe a naziriteship.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Nazir
רבי שמעון אומר יאמר אם היה בן קיימא וכו' – Rabbi Shimon holds hat a doubtful Naziriteship is judged stringently; therefore, he must be a Nazirite from doubt and makes a condition and states that if he is a viable fetus, I am a Naziritie out of obligation, and if not, I am a Nazirite out of free-choice, and he shaves and brings his [hair] sacrifices at the end of the thirty day period. But without the condition, he would not be able to bring the sacrifice from doubt, but the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Shimon.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Nazir
If [his wife] later bears a child, he then becomes a nazirite. Rabbi Shimon says: he should say, “If the first was a viable child, the first [naziriteship] was obligatory, and this one is voluntary; otherwise, the first one was voluntary, and the present one is obligatory.” If after the first miscarriage his wife becomes again pregnant and this time has a child, according to the first opinion, he must now observe a naziriteship because he did not previously observe one. For Rabbi Shimon he cannot just simply observe another naziriteship because he may have fulfilled his vow when he previously served a naziriteship. However, if the first one was only voluntary, then he is still liable to serve an obligatory naziriteship for his original vow. Therefore, he again stipulates, that if the first naziriteship was obligatory (the fetus was viable), then the current one is only voluntary, but if the first one was voluntary (the fetus was not viable), then the current one is the obligatory naziriteship.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Nazir
חזרה וילדה הרי זה נזיר – for he did not practice Naziriteship on account of the non-viable birth/abortion. But now that she gave birth to a living child, the Nazirite [vow] takes effect and according to Rabbi Shimon, he must retract and make the condition for perhaps the first child was a viable child.
