Mischna
Mischna

Kommentar zu Kiddushin 2:6

הַמְקַדֵּשׁ שְׁתֵּי נָשִׁים בְּשָׁוֶה פְרוּטָה, אוֹ אִשָּׁה אַחַת בְּפָחוֹת מִשָּׁוֶה פְרוּטָה, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁשָּׁלַח סִבְלוֹנוֹת לְאַחַר מִכָּאן, אֵינָהּ מְקֻדֶּשֶׁת, שֶׁמֵּחֲמַת קִדּוּשִׁין הָרִאשׁוֹנִים שָׁלַח. וְכֵן קָטָן שֶׁקִּדֵּשׁ:

Wenn man zwei Frauen mit dem Wert einer p'rutah oder eine Frau mit weniger als dem Wert einer p'rutah verlobte, selbst wenn er danach Sivlonoth sandte ["Sivlonoth" sind Geschenke, die der Bräutigam üblicherweise an seine Verlobte schickte], sie ist nicht verlobt. [Wir sagen nicht, dass er wusste, dass die Verlobung nicht vollzogen worden war und dass er beabsichtigte, sie mit diesen Sivlonoth zu vollenden], aber [wir sagen, dass] er sie wegen (was er für gutgläubig hielt) ursprünglicher Verlobung schickte . Gleiches gilt für einen Minderjährigen, der verlobt war [und Sivlonoth sandte, als er volljährig wurde].

Bartenura on Mishnah Kiddushin

סבלונות – presents that the groom generally sends to his betrothed.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Kiddushin

Introduction Our mishnah talks about a man who performs an invalid act of kiddushin and then later on sends presents to the woman whom he tried to betroth. The question is, is the sending of presents equivalent to a renewed and now valid act of betrothal, or are the presents not considered as effecting betrothal?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Kiddushin

אינה מקודשת – and we don’t say that he knew that his [act of] betrothal was not a betrothal and that he determined to send her presents of betrothal for the purpose of betrothal, but we say that because of the first betrothal, he sent [them].
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Kiddushin

If he betroths two women with the value of a perutah, or one woman with less than the value of a perutah, even if he subsequently sends gifts, she is not betrothed, because he sent them on account of the first kiddushin. In both of these cases the first act does not cause the woman, or women to be betrothed because there was not a perutah’s worth given to each woman. When the man later on sends gifts which are worth more than a perutah, we might have thought that these gifts can now act as the betrothal money. After all, he clearly intended to betroth her and she clearly agreed. However, the mishnah rules that since these gifts were not sent with the intent of effecting betrothal, they do not act as such. We also do not assume that the man realized that his first act of betrothal was invalid and that he is now sending betrothal money.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Kiddushin

וכן קטן שקידש – and he sent presents of betrothal when he became an adult
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Kiddushin

The same is true if a minor betroths. A minor cannot betroth a woman. Betrothal requires “awareness”, and minors legally lack the required “awareness.” Therefore, if he tries to betroth a certain woman, she is not betrothed. Even if he later on sends presents to the woman whom he tried to betroth, the presents do not effect kiddushin, for they were not sent as such but rather on account of the first act of betrothal, which was invalid.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Vorheriger VersGanzes KapitelNächster Vers