Wenn er Schwarz vorbereitet und Weiß gefunden hat, Weiß und Schwarz gefunden (sie sind verboten). [Dies ist (wie es ist) offensichtlich und muss nicht angegeben werden. Gemeint ist, dass, wenn er Schwarz und Weiß vorbereitet und Schwarz anstelle von Weiß und Weiß anstelle von Schwarz usw. gefunden hat. Und so ist unsere Mischna zu verstehen: Wenn er Schwarz in einem Nest und vorbereitet hat weiß darin gefunden; und wenn er Weiß in einem anderen Nest vorbereitete und Schwarz darin fand—wir könnten denken, dass sie die gleichen Vögel sind und dass sie Nester gewechselt haben; wir werden daher anders informiert.] (Wenn er vorbereitet hat) zwei und drei gefunden [und er erkennt die, die er vorbereitet hat, nicht erkennt], sind sie [alle] verboten. (Wenn er vorbereitet hat) drei und zwei gefunden, sind sie alle erlaubt. [Denn wir nehmen an, dass einer gegangen ist und der andere geblieben ist, und wir sagen nicht, dass einer gegangen ist, so dass sie alle gegangen sind und dies andere Vögel sind.] (Wenn er sie vorbereitet hat) im Nest und sie draußen gefunden [und nichts gefunden im Nest] sind sie verboten. Und wenn sie die einzigen dort [in der Taubenbucht] waren, sind sie erlaubt. [Und selbst wenn es innerhalb von fünfzig Ellen eine andere Tauben-Cote gibt, wenn diese Tauben-Cote nicht mit dieser ausgerichtet ist, sondern in einer Ecke, vermuten wir nicht, dass sie von dieser Tauben-Cote stammen könnte; für Jungvögel, solange sie nicht fliegen, sondern hüpfen, hüpfen sie nur zu einem Nest, das mit ihrem ausgerichtet ist, nur wenn sie, wenn sie sich umdrehen, ihr Nest sehen können.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Beitzah
זימן שחורים ומצא לבנים – this matter is simple and it was not necessary to teach it. But this is how it should be understood – that if he designated black and white ones and found black ones in the place of white ones and white ones in the place of black ones. And this is the explanation of our Mishnah – that he designated black ones in this nest and found white ones there, [or] he designated in the second [nest] white ones and found it black ones, you might think they had been reversed, but it comes to teach us that this is not the case.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Beitzah
Introduction
In yesterday’s mishnah we learned that in order to slaughter and eat doves on Yom Tov one must designate them for use before Yom Tov begins. Otherwise they are muktzeh. Our mishnah discusses what happens if he designated doves before Yom Tov but then is not sure that the doves that he finds in the nest or dovecote are the same ones.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Beitzah
שנים ומצא ג' – and he doesn’t recognize the ones that are ready, all of them are forbidden.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Beitzah
If he designated black [doves] but found [on Yom Tov] white ones, white [doves] but found black ones, two but found three, they are [all] forbidden. If the doves which he finds are a different color from those that he designated it is obvious that they are not the same doves that he designated the previous day. If he designated two doves and there are now three there, one of the doves is certainly muktzeh. The problem is that he doesn’t know which one because all three look alike (I wonder if doves think all humans look alike). Hence they are all prohibited.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Beitzah
שלשה ומצא שנים מותרים – and one went off, and he two remained. And we don’t say that just as the one went off, so all the others went off and these are the others.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Beitzah
[If he designated] three but found two, they are permitted. If he designated three but finds only two we can assume that one flew off and that the other two are the same ones he designated. Hence they are permitted.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Beitzah
זימן בתוך הקן ומצא לפני הקן – but within the nest he did not find all of them, they are forbidden.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Beitzah
[If he designated doves] inside the nest and found them in front of the nest, they are forbidden. But if none were there except these, they are permitted. If the doves are found outside of the nest but he designated them in the nest, then they may not be the same doves. If there is another nearby dovecote then he must be concerned about this possibility and he may not use those doves. However, if there are no nearby dovecotes then he can assume that these doves just found their way out and he may use them.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Beitzah
ואם אין באותו שובך אלא הן הרי אלו מותרין – and even though there is another dovecote near it within fifty cubits, if that dovecote is not in the row of this dovecote equivalently other than in the corner-piece, we don’t say that from that dovecote that is closest to it. For the pigeons all the while that they are not flying but are stretching their legs, they are not equally stretching other opposite their own nest, for if they see their nests when they turn around to their backs they stretch, and if not they do not stretch.
