Талмуд к Техарот 5:5
שְׁנֵי שְׁבִילִין, אֶחָד טָמֵא וְאֶחָד טָהוֹר, הָלַךְ בְּאַחַד מֵהֶן וְעָשָׂה טָהֳרוֹת, וּבָא חֲבֵרוֹ וְהָלַךְ בַּשֵּׁנִי וְעָשָׂה טָהֳרוֹת, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, אִם נִשְׁאֲלוּ זֶה בִפְנֵי עַצְמוֹ וְזֶה בִפְנֵי עַצְמוֹ, טְהוֹרִין. וְאִם נִשְׁאֲלוּ שְׁנֵיהֶם כְּאֶחָד, טְמֵאִים. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר, בֵּין כָּךְ וּבֵין כָּךְ, טְמֵאִים:
Два пути, один нечистый и один чистый, если кто-то спустился по одному из них, а затем приготовил чистые вещи, а затем его товарищ пришел и пошел по второму и приготовил чистые вещи, рабби Иегуда говорит: если каждый из них спрашивал индивидуально [ относительно его собственного статуса чистоты], они оба чисты, но если они спрашивают вместе, они нечисты. Раввин Йосе говорит: в любом случае они нечисты.
Jerusalem Talmud Terumot
Rebbi Joḥanan said, a doubt of dema‘ is free from ḥallah112Halakhah Ḥallah 1:3, on condition that the profane grain be more than the amount causing the dema‘. but a doubt of dema‘ which is eaten as dema‘ is subject to ḥallah113In the case of the two boxes, when we declare that there is no dema‘ but we require the grain to be eaten as if there were.. Rebbi Joḥanan said, this follows Rebbi Jehudah, as we have stated there114Mishnah Ṭahorot 5:5: “Two roads, one impure [it leads over a grave whose exact position is unknown] and one pure [and it is unknown which is which]. A person walked on one of them and prepared food in purity, another person walked on the other and prepared food in purity. Rebbi Jehudah says, if they ask together …”: “If they ask together, they are impure. One after the other they are pure. Rebbi Yose says, in both cases they are impure.” Where do we hold? If somebody comes to ask about himself and his friend. Rebbi Jehudah says, he says: ask about yourself115Since this is a doubt of impurity in the public domain, it has to be declared pure. and go away. But Rebbi Yose said, it is as if both of them asked together116While R. Yose must agree that singly their doubts must be resolved for purity, if there is a logical necessity (“in any way you look at it”) that one of them must be impure, that logical necessity overrides the rule about doubts.. And here it is as if both of them asked together117Even R. Jehudah must agree that in the case of the two boxes one cannot ask about one and then go away. R. Joḥanan wants to say that the baraita follows not only R. Yose but even R. Jehudah..
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy