Мишна
Мишна

Комментарий к Назир 3:7

מִי שֶׁהָיוּ שְׁתֵּי כִתֵּי עֵדִים מְעִידוֹת אוֹתוֹ, אֵלּוּ מְעִידִים שֶׁנָּזַר שְׁתַּיִם, וְאֵלּוּ מְעִידִים שֶׁנָּזַר חָמֵשׁ, בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים, נֶחְלְקָה הָעֵדוּת וְאֵין כָּאן נְזִירוּת. וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים, יֵשׁ בִּכְלָל חָמֵשׁ שְׁתַּיִם, שֶׁיְּהֵא נָזִיר שְׁתָּיִם:

Если два свидетеля дали показания о человеке, один из них сказал, что он поклялся двум [нацитизмам], а другой сказал, что он поклялся пяти —[В то же время, когда вы говорите, что он поклялся два, мы говорим, что он поклялся пять. И он говорит, что он вовсе не клялся]—Бет Шаммай говорит, что показания разделились. [Поскольку они противоречат друг другу, их слова аннулируются, и свидетельство не получается.] И Бет Гилель говорит: в пять входят два, и он должен соблюдать два нацитизма.

Bartenura on Mishnah Nazir

אלו מעידים שנדר שתים – two [periods of] Naziriteship and those [witnesses] testify that he took a vow for five [periods of] Naziriteship; at the same time that you state that he took a vow for two [Naziriteships], wwe testify that he took a vow of five Naziriteships, and he states that he did not take a vow at all.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Nazir

Introduction This mishnah, while ostensibly discussing nazirite laws, is really discussing the laws of testimony. Generally, when two sets of witnesses disagree, two saying one thing and two saying the other, the testimony is invalid. However, if one set says that the defendant owes two hundred, and the other set says he owes five hundred, there is a dispute whether the defendant is liable for the lower amount, based on the principle that all witnesses agree that he owes at least two hundred. Our mishnah deals with a similar case, except it uses naziriteships instead of money.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Nazir

One who has two sets of witnesses testifying about him: one says that he vowed two [naziriteships] and the other that he vowed five: Beth Shammai says: the evidence is conflicting, and there is no naziriteship at all. But Beth Hillel says: “five” includes “two”, so that he becomes a nazirite for two [naziriteships]. According to Beth Shammai, the testimony is conflicting and therefore it is as if there is no testimony at all. However, Beth Hillel says that there is testimony from all sets regarding two naziriteships, and therefore he must observe two.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Nazir

בש"א נחלקה העדות – since they contradict each other, their words are voided, and there isn’t any testimony at all.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Nazir

וב"ה אומר יש בכלל חמש שתים – and he will be a Nazirite for two years.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Предыдущий стихПолная главаСледующий стих