Talmud sobre Ohalot 2:2

רְבִיעִית דָּם, וּרְבִיעִית דַּם תְּבוּסָה מִמֵּת אֶחָד. רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא אוֹמֵר, מִשְּׁנֵי מֵתִים. דַּם קָטָן שֶׁיָּצָא כֻלּוֹ, רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא אוֹמֵר, כָּל שֶׁהוּא. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, רְבִיעִית. כַּזַּיִת רִמָּה, בֵּין חַיָּה בֵּין מֵתָה, רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר מְטַמֵּא כִבְשָׂרוֹ, וַחֲכָמִים מְטַהֲרִים. אֵפֶר שְׂרוּפִים, רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר אוֹמֵר, שִׁעוּרוֹ בְרֹבַע, וַחֲכָמִים מְטַהֲרִין. מְלֹא תַרְוָד וְעוֹד עֲפַר קְבָרוֹת, טָמֵא, רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן מְטַהֵר. מְלֹא תַרְוָד רָקָב שֶׁגְּבָלוֹ בְמַיִם, אֵינוֹ חִבּוּר לְטֻמְאָה:

Um Revi'it [unidade específica de volume] de sangue e um Revi'it de sangue misto de um cadáver [impurificar através da sombra]. O rabino Akiva diz: [até] de dois cadáveres. O sangue de uma criança que vazou completamente: o rabino Akiva diz qualquer quantia, os sábios dizem um revi'it . Uma porção de vermes do tamanho de uma azeitona, viva ou morta, o rabino Eliezer considera impura como sua carne. E os Sábios consideram isso puro. Cinzas de pessoas cremadas: o rabino Eliezer diz que a medida [de desburocratizar] é uma Rova . E os Sábios consideram isso puro. Uma concha e mais pó de sepultura é impura. O rabino Shimon considera isso puro. Uma concha de cadáver decomposto amassada com água não combina para se tornar impura.

Jerusalem Talmud Nazir

MISHNAH: Rebbi Eleazar said in the name of Rebbi Joshua: For any impurity caused by a corpse for which the nazir shaves¹⁹⁰Explained in Mishnah 2., one is guilty if entering the Sanctuary, but for any impurity caused by a corpse for which the nazir does not shave¹⁹¹Explained in Mishnah 3. In Mishnah Parah 11:4 the formulation is: “For any impurity which requires immersion in water by biblical decree, one is guilty if entering the Sanctuary, but for any impurity which does not require immersion in water by biblical decree, one is not guilty if entering the Sanctuary.”, one is not guilty if entering the Sanctuary. Rebbi Meïr said, this should not be less than the impurity of a dead reptile¹⁹²Which requires immersion in water by biblical decree, Lev. 11:31, and a person is guilty if he enters the Sanctuary when impure, Lev. 5:2.! Rebbi Aqiba said, I argued before Rebbi Eliezer: If for a barley-grain sized bone, which does not cause impurity to a human in a tent¹⁹³Mishnah Ahilut 2:1., a nazir shaves if he touches or carries it¹⁹⁰Explained in Mishnah 2., should it not be logical that for a quartarius of blood, which causes impurity to a human in a tent¹⁹⁴Mishnah Ahilut 2:2. The nazir does not shave, Mishnah 3., a nazir should have to shave if he touches or carries it? He said to me, what is that, Aqiba? This is not a place for an argument de minore ad majus! When I came and expounded that before Rebbi Joshua, he said to me, you have a good argument, but that is what they said was practice¹⁹⁵“Practice” here means an old tradition, whose origin can no longer be ascertained and which cannot be overruled. The relationship of this kind of practice to the interpretation of biblical verses is not amenable to logical analysis..

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Versículo anterior Capítulo completo Próximo versículo