Mishnah
Mishnah

Talmud sobre Ketubot 4:10

לֹא כָתַב לָהּ, בְּנִין דִּכְרִין דְּיֶהֱווֹן לִיכִי מִנַּאי אִנּוּן יִרְתוּן כְּסַף כְּתֻבְּתִיךְ יָתֵר עַל חוּלְקֵיהוֹן דְּעִם אֲחוּהוֹן, חַיָּב שֶׁהוּא תְנַאי בֵּית דִּין:

(Se ele não escreveu :) "Você ficará sentado em minha casa e será alimentado da minha propriedade todos os dias da duração da sua viuvez em minha casa", ele é (no entanto) responsável (por isso), pois é um condição de beth-din. Os homens de Jerusalém escreveriam assim. Os homens do Galil escreveriam como os homens de Jerusalém. Os homens de Judá escreveriam: "... até que os herdeiros desejem dar-lhe o seu kethubah". Portanto, se os herdeiros desejarem, eles lhe dão kethubah e a "isentam". [A halachá não está de acordo com os homens de Judá; mas desde que ela não se case e não a reivindique kethubah em beth-din, ela é alimentada pelas propriedades de seu marido e vive na casa em que viveu quando seu marido estava vivo, e usa todos os vasos que ela usou nela. vida do marido.]

Jerusalem Talmud Bava Batra

HALAKHAH: “If one of co-owning brothers,” etc. It was stated61Cf. Tosephta 10:5.: If one of co-owning brothers was requisitioned for government service. If this was because of the sharecroppper62This makes no sense. The correct reading is given in Šiṭṭah mequbbeṣet ad 144b in the name of Ravad and Rashba Novellae ad 144b: brothers. Since only rich and well-known people were ordered to pay for the city services, if the estate was renowned for its riches, the estate had to pay for the cost of services. If it was because of the personal renown of the person appointed, he had to bear the cost., he takes because of the sharecropper62This makes no sense. The correct reading is given in Šiṭṭah mequbbeṣet ad 144b in the name of Ravad and Rashba Novellae ad 144b: brothers. Since only rich and well-known people were ordered to pay for the city services, if the estate was renowned for its riches, the estate had to pay for the cost of services. If it was because of the personal renown of the person appointed, he had to bear the cost.. If because of the head of household, he takes as head of household. As the following: Rav Naḥman bar Samuel bar Naḥman was appointed to the city council63Greek βουλή, responsible not only for city services but also for the collection of taxes.. The case came before Rebbi Immi. He said, if Naḥman who was caught has enough property, it should be given from his property; otherwise it should be given to him from the common estate.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Versículo anteriorCapítulo completoPróximo versículo