Alguém que retoma seu divórcio [depois que ela se casa] e alguém que se casa com sua chalutzah, [que lhe é proibida por (Deuteronômio 25: 9): "quem não edifica a casa de seu irmão" —Uma vez que ele não o construiu (por ter dado chalitzah), ele não pode mais construí-lo], e alguém que se casa com os parentes de sua chalutzah [R. Akiva sustentando que sua chalutzah é como sua esposa, tendo as Escrituras se referido a ela como sua "casa", viz. (Ibid. 10): "a casa do sapato removido" (chalutz hana'al) e R. Akiva sustentando, também, que o filho de um casamento interditado é um mamzer. (A halachá não é assim.)] Deve mandá-la embora e a criança é um mamzer. Esta é a palavra de R. Akiva. E os sábios dizem: A criança não é um mamzer. E eles admitem que, se alguém se casa com os parentes de seu divorciado, o filho é um mamzer, [pois seu divorciado é como sua esposa, e sua mãe e sua irmã estão sob interdito de krithuth.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Yevamot
מהחזיר את גרושתו – from whom he was married.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Yevamot
Introduction
Our mishnah begins to discuss the definition of a mamzer, the child of an illicit union. The question that is asked is: which illicit unions produce children that are considered mamzers?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Yevamot
והנושא את חלוצתו – since we establish regarding him with the negative commandment (Deuteronomy 25:9): “ [Thus shall be done to the man] who will not build up his brother’s house,” since he did not “build up,” he furthermore will not build up.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Yevamot
A man who remarried his divorced wife, or married his halutzah, or married the relative of his halutzah must divorce her, and the child is a mamzer; the words of Rabbi Akiva. But the Sages say: the child is not a mamzer. They agree that where a man married the relative of his divorcee the child is a mamzer. According to Deuteronomy 24:2-4 if a man divorces his wife and she remarries and then is divorced or widowed, the first husband may not remarry her. As we have seen throughout this tractate a man may not marry his halutzah or the relative of his halutzah (for instance her mother or daughter). Rabbi Akiva says that if the man does transgress and marry one of these women he must divorce her and the child is a mamzer. As we shall see in the next mishnah, Rabbi Akiva holds that the child of any illegal union is a mamzer. The Sages disagree and hold that the child is not a mamzer. As we shall see in the next mishnah, the Sages hold that a union that is a transgression of a negative commandment that is not punished by death or kareth does not create a mamzer. Since these transgressions are not punished by kareth, the child is not a mamzer. Furthermore, the prohibition of the sister of one’s halutzah is only derabbanan (of rabbinic origin) and therefore the child cannot be a mamzer. Marrying the relative of one’s divorcee is biblically prohibited and is punishable by kareth. Therefore the Sages agree with Rabbi Akiva that the child is a mamzer.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Yevamot
והנושא קרובת חלוצתו – since Rabbi Akiva holds that the woman who takes off the shoe and spits in his face (by refusing to perform levirate marriage) is like his wife, and Scripture calls her, “his house,” as it is written (Deuteronomy 25:10): “the family of the un-sandaled one.” And also, Rabbi Akiva holds that there is a Mamzer from those who are liable for violating negative commandments, but this is not the Halakha.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Yevamot
קרובת גרושתו – for his divorced wife is like his wife, and her mother and her sister [if they are subsequently married to him] make him liable for extirpation.
