Comentário sobre Tahorot 5:6
שְׁנֵי כִכָּרִים, אֶחָד טָמֵא וְאֶחָד טָהוֹר, אָכַל אֶת אַחַד מֵהֶם וְעָשָׂה טָהֳרוֹת וּבָא חֲבֵרוֹ וְאָכַל אֶת הַשֵּׁנִי וְעָשָׂה טָהֳרוֹת, רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, אִם נִשְׁאֲלוּ זֶה בִפְנֵי עַצְמוֹ וְזֶה בִפְנֵי עַצְמוֹ, טְהוֹרִין. וְאִם נִשְׁאֲלוּ שְׁנֵיהֶן כְּאַחַת, טְמֵאִים. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר, בֵּין כָּךְ וּבֵין כָּךְ, טְמֵאִים:
Dois pães, um impuro e um puro, se alguém comeu um deles e depois preparou coisas puras, e então seu companheiro veio e comeu o segundo e depois preparou coisas puras, o rabino Yehuda diz: Se cada um deles perguntasse individualmente [a respeito de seu próprio status de pureza], ambos são puros, mas se perguntaram juntos, são impuros. O rabino Yose diz: em ambos os casos, eles são impuros.
Bartenura on Mishnah Tahorot
אכל אחד מהן – it (i.e., the Mishnah) taught defilement according to the Torah and it [also] teaches defilement according to the Rabbi. And the dispute of Rabbi Yehuda and Rabbi Yossi here also is when one comes to be interrogated upon and on his neighbor, like the dispute above (in Mishnah 5). And the Halakha is according to Rabbi Yossi.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Tahorot
If there were two loaves, the one unclean and the other clean, and a man ate one of them and then prepared clean food, and afterwards another man came and ate the second loaf and then prepared clean food:
Rabbi Judah ruled: if each by himself asked for a ruling they are both to be declared clean, but if they asked simultaneously both are to be declared unclean.
Rabbi Yose ruled: in either case they are both unclean.
This mishnah contains the same ruling as yesterday's mishnah, it just refers to a different case of doubtful impurity. Whereas yesterday's case discussed a situation in which we are not sure which of two men walked down an impure path, today's mishnah discusses a case where we are not sure which of two men ate an impure loaf of bread. Other than that, the mishnah is the same, so look at yesterday's mishnah for an explanation.
Rabbi Judah ruled: if each by himself asked for a ruling they are both to be declared clean, but if they asked simultaneously both are to be declared unclean.
Rabbi Yose ruled: in either case they are both unclean.
This mishnah contains the same ruling as yesterday's mishnah, it just refers to a different case of doubtful impurity. Whereas yesterday's case discussed a situation in which we are not sure which of two men walked down an impure path, today's mishnah discusses a case where we are not sure which of two men ate an impure loaf of bread. Other than that, the mishnah is the same, so look at yesterday's mishnah for an explanation.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy