Cinco grupos que moram em um traklin [uma mansão, dividida em cinco seções, cada uma com uma entrada para o pátio e exigindo um eruv com aqueles que compartilham o pátio] —Beth Shammai diz: Um eruv (é necessário) para cada grupo. [Os domínios são divididos e cada grupo deve fornecer um pão para o eruv do pátio.] Beth Hillel diz: Um eruv (é suficiente) para todos. [Essa partição não constitui separação de domínios.] E eles admitem que, quando alguns deles residem em salas ou câmaras superiores, é necessário um eruv separado para cada grupo. [Quando o traklin é dividido por divisórias altas que chegam ao teto, todos concordam que isso constitui separação de domínios, sendo o equivalente a residir em salas ou câmaras superiores. Eles diferem quando dividido por partições baixas que não atingem o teto. Beth Shammai sustenta que essa partição afeta a separação de domínio, e Beth Hillel, que não.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
בטרקלין – a large and wide house, the seat of kings and they divided it to five [rooms] and all of them has an doorway from the reception room to the courtyard and they need to make an Eruv with the other members of the courtyard.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
Introduction
This mishnah deals with a situation where five different companies of men are spending Shabbat in one hall within a courtyard. The question is whether each company must contribute separately to the courtyard’s eruv set, or whether it is sufficient for all of the five companies to make one joint contribution to the eruv.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
בית שמאי אומרים – their domains are divided and each group/party needs to place bread for the Eruv of the courtyard.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
Five companies [of men] who spent Shabbat in one hall:: Bet Shammai says: an eruv for each an every company; But Bet Hillel says: one eruv for them all. According to Bet Shammai, since each of the five groups is distinct from the other, they must each set up their own eruv. Bet Hillel holds that since they are residing in the same hall, they can be treated as one entity and they may make one joint contribution to the eruv.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin
ב"ה אומרים – this partition does not [provide] the division of domains. But at the time when they divided the reception room into large partitions that reach the ceiling, no one disagrees that this is a division of domains because they are living in rooms or in attics But they do disagree when divided into low partitions that do not reach the ceiling, as the School of Shammai holds that a partition such as this divides the domain and the School of Hillel holds that there is no division of domains.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin
They agree that where some of them occupy rooms or upper chambers, that they must make an eruv for each and every company. If the hall leads to other rooms or to upper chambers and some members of the various groups are in these other areas, each company must make a separate contribution to the eruv. Even though all of these areas are connected to the main hall, the hall is not sufficient to make it as if they were all in the same house. The Yerushalmi explains that the hall is to the rooms as a courtyard is to houses: just as every house connected to the courtyard must contribute to the eruv, so too every company in the hall must contribute.
