Mishnah
Mishnah

Comentário sobre Eruvin 1:5

הָיְתָה שֶׁל קַשׁ אוֹ שֶׁל קָנִים, רוֹאִין אוֹתָהּ כְּאִלּוּ הִיא שֶׁל מַתֶּכֶת. עֲקֻמָּה, רוֹאִין אוֹתָהּ כְּאִלּוּ הִיא פְשׁוּטָה. עֲגֻלָּה, רוֹאִין אוֹתָהּ כְּאִלּוּ הִיא מְרֻבַּעַת. כֹּל שֶׁיֵּשׁ בְּהֶקֵּפוֹ שְׁלֹשָׁה טְפָחִים, יֶשׁ בּוֹ רֹחַב טָפַח:

Se (o korah) fosse de palha ou junco, é visto como se fosse de metal. [R. Yehudah diz isso. A halachá não está de acordo com ele.] Se estivesse torta, [de modo que um ariaca não pudesse repousar sobre ela (como também não poderia se fosse redonda)], é vista como se fosse reta. Se fosse redondo, é visto como se fosse quadrado. Tudo o que tem três tefachim de circunferência é um tefachim de largura. [Ou seja, qual é a medida necessária para uma corá redonda? O que quer que seja três tefachim na circunferência— ou seja, o que requer um cordão de três tefachim para contorná-lo —se ao quadrado tivesse uma largura de tefach. Pois assim encontramos com o inhame (o reservatório) feito por Salomão, viz. (I Reis 7:23): "E ele fez o inhame derretido, dez côvados de aba a aba, em volta de toda a volta ... e uma linha de trinta côvados a cercou"— de onde se vê que para cada côvado de largura no círculo, existem três côvados de circunferência.]

Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin

היתה של קש ושל קנים – Rabbi Yehuda stated this but the Halakha is not according to him.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin

Introduction This mishnah is a continuation of Rabbi Judah’s words from yesterday’s mishnah. Rabbi Judah held that the cross-beam need not actually be strong enough to support a half-brick.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin

עקומה – the small bricks are not able to rest upon it (when it is curved) and similarly when it is round, a small brick cannot rest upon it.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin

If [the cross-beam] was made of straw or reeds, we look at it as if it was of metal. If the cross-beam was made of a material which could not hold a half-brick, Rabbi Judah considers it nevertheless as if it was strong enough to do so.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Bartenura on Mishnah Eruvin

if it has in its circumference: Which is to say, what is the round measurement required to render [the beam] proper? Anything that has in its circumference three handbreadths, which requires a string of three handbreadths to encircle it around, it is known that it has a width (diameter) of one handbreadth, if you divide [it]. As so do we find with the basin that Shlomo made (II Chronicles 4:2), "ten ells from its edge to its edge and five ells of height and a line of thirty ells encircling it around." Hence for every ell in width (diameter), there are three ells in circumference.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin

[If it was] curved we look at it as if it were straight. If it was curved, it also could not hold a half-brick. Nevertheless, Rabbi Judah holds that it is valid.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

English Explanation of Mishnah Eruvin

[If it was] round we look at it as if it were square. Whatever has a circumference of three handbreadths has a diameter of one handbreadth. Again, a round cross-beam could not hold a half-brick. However, it still must be wide enough to hold a one handbreadth half-brick. In order for this to be true, it must have a circumference of three handbreadths (the rabbis knew that pi was roughly three to one, and they knew that this was not exact).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Versículo anteriorCapítulo completoPróximo versículo