Talmud do Jadaim 3:2

כֹּל הַפּוֹסֵל אֶת הַתְּרוּמָה, מְטַמֵּא אֶת הַיָּדַיִם לִהְיוֹת שְׁנִיּוֹת. הַיָּד מְטַמְּאָה אֶת חֲבֶרְתָּהּ, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים, אֵין שֵׁנִי עוֹשֶׂה שֵׁנִי. אָמַר לָהֶם, וַהֲלֹא כִתְבֵי הַקֹּדֶשׁ שְׁנִיִּים מְטַמְּאִין אֶת הַיָּדַיִם. אָמְרוּ לוֹ, אֵין דָּנִין דִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה מִדִּבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים, וְלֹא דִבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים מִדִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה, וְלֹא דִבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים מִדִּבְרֵי סוֹפְרִים:

Wszystko, co unieważnia terumah [część plonu, która musi być przekazana kapłanowi i może być skonsumowana tylko przez kapłanów lub ich domowników], czyni ręce drugorzędnymi [stopniami] nieczystości. Według rabina Jehoszua jedna ręka czyni drugą rękę nieczystą. A Mędrcy mówią: coś [o] drugorzędnym [stopniu nieczystości] nie może sprawić, że coś będzie [o] drugorzędnym [stopniu nieczystości]. Powiedział im: Czy święte pisma nie są drugorzędne [o stopniu nieczystości] i czynią ręce nieczystymi [z drugorzędnym stopniem nieczystości] !? Powiedzieli mu: nie możemy wywnioskować słów Tory [tj. Praw w spisanej Torze] ze słów uczonych [tj. Praw w ustnej Torze], ani słów uczonych ze słów Tory, ani słów uczonych ze słów uczonych.

Jerusalem Talmud Chagigah

“For heave, if one of his hands became impure the other remains pure.” “To make sancta impure, the words of Rebbi. Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Jehudah says, to disqualify sancta.¹¹⁵Tosephta 3:10; Babli 24a. The text of the Tosephta is: A person who immerses one hand and prepares food in purity, any food prepared until he immerses the other hand is impure since one hand makes the other impure to make sancta impure …” The Tosephta implies that if one hand is impure, in preparation of sancta the other is impure in the second degree for Rebbi, in the third for R. Yose ben R. Jehudah.” How? Following Rebbi Joshua? As we have stated there¹¹⁶Mishnah Yadaim 3:2., “anything which disqualifies heave makes hands impure in the second degree, and one hand makes the other one impure, the words of Rebbi Joshua.” And Rebbi Joshua says more than Rebbi, since what Rebbi said refers to sancta, but Rebbi Joshua refers to heave¹¹⁷Therefore the Mishnah here which treats heave (disqualified by second degree impurity) more leniently than sancta (disqualified by third degree impurity) cannot be R. Joshua’s..

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Chagigah

Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said, they only stated “the other”, not a stranger’s¹¹⁸This refers to the statement that for sancta both hands have to be washed since otherwise one impure hand causes the other hand also to be impure. The problem is whether the other hand, which was not exposed to impurity, is impure in the second degree as impure hand, or of the third as derivative of second degree impurity. R. Simeon ben Laqish holds that it is impure in the third degree, R. Joḥanan that it is second.. Rebbi Joḥanan said, even a stranger’s. Rebbi Jeremiah, Rebbi Immi in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan, even a loaf. They said, Rebbi Joḥanan retracted this; when he said so it was before he changed his mind. He only said to make a loaf impure, because of “anything which disqualifies heave makes hands impure in the second degree.” Therefore to make a loaf impure everybody agrees that it does not make impure¹¹⁹For anything but the other hand of the person one follows the rule that induced impurity is one degree more than the inducing one. Therefore the second hand may disqualify a loaf of sancta but cannot possibly make it impure., since “no second degree creates second degree.¹¹⁶Mishnah Yadaim 3:2.”

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Poprzedni werset Cały rozdział Następny werset