Talmud do Temura 3:5

תְּמוּרַת הַבְּכוֹר וְהַמַּעֲשֵׂר, וּוְלָדָן, וּוְלַד וְלָדָן עַד סוֹף הָעוֹלָם, הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ כִבְכוֹר וּכְמַעֲשֵׂר, וְיֵאָכְלוּ בְמוּמָם לַבְּעָלִים. מַה בֵּין הַבְּכוֹר וְהַמַּעֲשֵׂר לְבֵין כָּל הַקֳּדָשִׁים. שֶׁכָּל הַקֳּדָשִׁים נִמְכָּרִים בְּאִטְלִיס וְנִשְׁחָטִין בְּאִטְלִיס וְנִשְׁקָלִין בְּלִטְרָא, חוּץ מִן הַבְּכוֹר וּמִן הַמַּעֲשֵׂר. וְיֵשׁ לָהֶן פִּדְיוֹן, וְלִתְמוּרוֹתֵיהֶן פִּדְיוֹן, חוּץ מִן הַבְּכוֹר וּמִן הַמַּעֲשֵׂר. וּבָאִים מֵחוּצָה לָאָרֶץ, חוּץ מִן הַבְּכוֹר וּמִן הַמַּעֲשֵׂר. אִם בָּאוּ תְמִימִים, יִקְרְבוּ. וְאִם בַּעֲלֵי מוּמִין, יֵאָכְלוּ בְמוּמָן לַבְּעָלִים. אָמַר רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן, מַה הַטַּעַם. שֶׁהַבְּכוֹר וְהַמַּעֲשֵׂר יֵשׁ לָהֶן פַּרְנָסָה בִמְקוֹמָן, וּשְׁאָר כָּל הַקֳּדָשִׁים אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁנּוֹלַד לָהֶם מוּם, הֲרֵי אֵלּוּ בִקְדֻשָּׁתָן:

Zwierzęta zastępują pierworodnych i dziesięcinę [ofiary], ich potomstwo i potomstwo ich potomstwa aż do skończenia świata, oto są jak pierworodni i dziesięcina, i są spożywane z powodu swoich skazy przez ich właściciele. Jaka jest różnica między pierworodnym a dziesięciną i wszystkimi [innymi] świętymi [ofiarami]? Wszystkie [inne] święte [ofiary] są sprzedawane na targu mięsnym i zabijane na targu mięsnym, i są ważone na wadze - z wyjątkiem pierworodnych i dziesięciny; są wykupieni [gdy są skażeni], a ich substytuty są wykupione - z wyjątkiem pierworodnych i dziesięciny; oni [mogą] pochodzić spoza Ziemi [Izraela] - z wyjątkiem pierworodnych i dziesięciny, [ale] jeśli [jednak] przybyli [spoza Ziemi Izraela, jeśli] są nieskalani, zostaną ofiarowani; a jeśli są skażone, zostaną zjedzeni przez właścicieli z powodu ich skazy. Rabin Szimon powiedział: jaki jest tego powód? Pierworodni i dziesięcina mają zaopatrzenie [jeśli zostaną skażeni] na swoim miejscu; wszystkie [inne] święte [ofiary], gdyby zostały skażone, pozostają święte [i nie można ich zapewnić poza Ziemią Izraela].

Jerusalem Talmud Challah

Does it follow him who says the Pesaḥ of women is voluntary¹⁹⁴That they refused to let Joseph the Cohen bring the Second Pesaḥ for his entire family. The same discussion in Pesaḥim 8:1 (fol. 35d), Qiddušin 1:8 (fol. 61c); cf. Babli Pesaḥim 93a, Mekhilta R. Ismael Ba 3, Mekhilta R. Simeon bar Ioḥai p. 10.? It was stated¹⁹⁵Tosephta Pesaḥim 8:10. There, the opinion of R. Meïr is attributed to R. Jehudah.: “A woman may make the First Pesaḥ by herself and the Second joining others¹⁹⁶Joining a group of men who are biblically obligated; cf. Note 177., the words of Rebbi Meïr. Rebbi Yose says, a woman may make the Second Pesaḥ by herself, even on the Sabbath¹⁹⁷If the 14th of Iyar is a Sabbath, the sacrifice has precedence over the Sabbath., and certainly the First. Rebbi Simeon ben Eleazar says, a woman may make the First Pesaḥ joining others but does not make the Second.” What is the reason of Rebbi Meïr? (Ex. 12:3) “Every man a sheep for the family,” if they want “a sheep for the house¹⁹⁸Everywhere in rabbinic Hebrew, “house” of a family is the wife..” What is the reason of Rebbi Yose, “Every man a sheep for the family,” a fortiori “a sheep for the house.” What is the reason of Rebbi Simeon ben Eleazar? “Every man”, not woman. How do the rabbis uphold “man”? A man, not a minor¹⁹⁹In the Tosephta (Note 195) the reason they turned back Joseph the Cohen was not that he brought his wife and children but his minor grandson. In that version, there is no place for disagreement or special situation.. Rebbi Jonah said, even according to him who says it is an obligation, it is different here since the occasion was news, that it should not become an obligation²⁰⁰If a renowned authority does something, everybody will rush to emulate him and in the next generation it will already be a common standard and acquire the status of “practice of the forefathers from time immemorial”. Even R. Yose will agree that in such a situation one should not allow a public display of special devotion. The Babli Pesaḥim 93a quotes a Tosephta which includes women impure because of childbirth in the list of persons obligated to observe the Second Pesaḥ.. Did we not hold²⁰¹Mishnah Menaḥot 10:6, Babli Menaḥot 69a, speaking of First Fruits. There seems to be no reason why the people from Hyena Mountain should not be permitted to bring their first fruits early. The answer is, they would have been permitted had some of them come as individuals. But that the people from an entire region should come publicly to do what is only tolerated is unacceptable.: “Before the Two Breads one should not bring but if somebody brought it is acceptable?” It is different here since the occasion was news, that it should not become an obligation. Did we not state²⁰²Mishnah Temurah 3:5. Why should Ben-Atitas not be permitted to bring his firstlings?: “If they were without blemish they should be sacrificed”? It is different here since the occasion was news, that it should not become an obligation.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Poprzedni werset Cały rozdział Następny werset