Talmud do Edujot 5:2

רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר, שִׁשָּׁה דְבָרִים מִקֻּלֵי בֵית שַׁמַּאי וּמֵחֻמְרֵי בֵית הִלֵּל. הָעוֹף עוֹלֶה עִם הַגְּבִינָה עַל הַשֻּׁלְחָן וְאֵינוֹ נֶאֱכָל, כְּדִבְרֵי בֵית שַׁמָּאי. וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים, אֵינוֹ עוֹלֶה וְאֵינוֹ נֶאֱכָל. תּוֹרְמִין זֵיתִים עַל שֶׁמֶן, וַעֲנָבִים עַל יַיִן, כְּדִבְרֵי בֵית שַׁמָּאי. וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים, אֵין תּוֹרְמִין. הַזּוֹרֵעַ אַרְבַּע אַמּוֹת שֶׁבַּכֶּרֶם, בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים, קִדֵּשׁ שׁוּרָה אַחַת, וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים, קִדֵּשׁ שְׁתֵּי שׁוּרוֹת. הַמְּעִיסָה, בֵּית שַׁמַּאי פּוֹטְרִין, וּבֵית הִלֵּל מְחַיְּבִין. מַטְבִּילִין בְּחַרְדָּלִית, כְּדִבְרֵי בֵית שַׁמָּאי. וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים, אֵין מַטְבִּילִין. גֵּר שֶׁנִּתְגַּיֵּר עַרְבֵי פְסָחִים, בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים, טוֹבֵל וְאוֹכֵל אֶת פִּסְחוֹ לָעֶרֶב. וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים, הַפּוֹרֵשׁ מִן הָעָרְלָה, כְּפוֹרֵשׁ מִן הַקָּבֶר:

R. Yossi mówi: Sześć rzeczy to pobłażliwość Beth Shammai i surowość Beth Hillel: Według Beth Shammai, kurczaka można przynosić z serem na stole, [jego issur jest tylko skrybą], ale nie można go jeść . A Beth Hillel mówi: „Nie można go tam wnosić” [dekret, aby nie wnosił sera z mięsem w kotle do gotowania, co jest zabronione według Tory, jako „gotowanie”]; i nie jest spożywane (razem).

Jerusalem Talmud Terumot

There¹⁹¹Mishnah Idiut 5:2. The other four examples refer to Mishnaiot in Kilaim,Ḥallah,Miqwaot,Pesaḥim. we have stated: “Rebbi Yose says, in six matters are the House of Shammai lenient and the House of Hillel restrictive: Fowl may be served on the table together with cheese but cannot be eaten together according to the House of Shammai, but the House of Hillel say it may not be served or eaten¹⁹²Everybody agrees that fowl meat is not meat in the biblical sense since it says: “You may not cook a kid goat in its mother’s milk” and birds have no milk. Nevertheless, as rabbinic “fence”, one may not eat birds’ meat with any milk product.. One gives heave from olives on oil and from grapes on wine according to the House of Shammai, but the House of Hillel say one may not.” Rebbi Mana said, it cannot be “from olives on oil” but “from oil on olives” because this is Rebbi Yose’s! For Rebbi Yose says it is heave and he has to give another heave; that is, if the first [heave] does no longer exist but if the first exists he gives it its name and that is enough¹⁹³If the heave given first can be extended to cover the oil produced from the olives after heave was separated, it follows that R. Yose assumes that olives which were started in purity will be kept in purity until the last drop of oil has been extracted and the heave is legitimate as given from “pure on pure.” It follows that R. Yose rejects any consideration of a “fence for purification water”; he requires a genuine second heave only if either the first one was eaten or if the additional oil was made impure; in the latter case one may not use the first heave following Mishnah 2:1..

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Poprzedni werset Cały rozdział Następny werset