Talmud do Chullin 10:4

גֵּר שֶׁנִּתְגַּיֵּר וְהָיְתָה לוֹ פָרָה, נִשְׁחֲטָה עַד שֶׁלֹּא נִתְגַּיֵּר, פָּטוּר. מִשֶּׁנִּתְגַּיֵּר, חַיָּב. סָפֵק, פָּטוּר, שֶׁהַמּוֹצִיא מֵחֲבֵרוֹ עָלָיו הָרְאָיָה. אֵיזֶהוּ הַזְּרוֹעַ, מִן הַפֶּרֶק שֶׁל אַרְכֻּבָּה עַד כַּף שֶׁל יָד. וְהוּא שֶׁל נָזִיר. וּכְנֶגְדּוֹ בָרֶגֶל, שׁוֹק. רַבִּי יְהוּדָה אוֹמֵר, שׁוֹק, מִן הַפֶּרֶק שֶׁל אַרְכֻּבָּה עַד סֹבֶךְ שֶׁל רָגֶל. אֵיזֶהוּ לְחִי, מִן הַפֶּרֶק שֶׁל לְחִי עַד פִּקָּה שֶׁל גַּרְגָּרֶת:

Jeśli prozelita miał krowę, którą zabił, zanim przyjął judaizm, jest wolny od płacenia oblacji, ale nie, jeśli ubój nastąpił po jego nawróceniu. W wątpliwym przypadku jest on wolny, ponieważ ciężar odpowiedzialności spoczywa na tym, który zgłasza roszczenie. Jakie są granice barku? Od zgięcia kolana do kości biodrowej: dotyczy to również barku, o którym mowa w ofierze nazarejczyka, jak również tylnej nogi aż do pnia [w ofiarach pokoju]. [Granice] nogi są, według R. Jehudy, od stawu biodrowego do uda. [Granice] dwóch policzków rozciągają się od ich stawów do górnego pierścienia tchawicy.

Jerusalem Talmud Challah

There, we have stated⁶⁷Mishnah Ḥulin 10:4. The chapter deals with the obligatory gifts to the Cohen from profane slaughter: forearm, jawbone and first stomach (Deut. 18:3). These gifts are totally profane; no holiness is attached to them at any moment. Therefore, a Cohen who claims these gifts would have to prove by legal standards that the gifts are due. Because of the nature of the doubt, this proof is precluded.: “If a proselyte became Jewish while he had a cow, if she was slaughtered before he became Jewish he is free, after he had become Jewish he is obligated. In case of doubt he is free because the burden of proof is on the claimant.” There you say in doubt he is free, here you say in doubt he is obligated. Rebbi Abba said, this was challenged before Rebbi Ammi and he said, who would tell me that he takes its value from the tribe⁶⁸Since the duty of ḥallah is questionable, he suggests that the proselyte sell his ḥallah to a Cohen.! Rebbi Jacob bar Zavdi, Rebbi Ḥiyya in the name of Rebbi Eleazar, he takes its value from the tribe. Why can he not put aside there⁶⁹In the case of profane slaughter, why can we not require that the Cohen’s gifts be sold exclusively to Cohanim? and take its value from the tribe? Rebbi Yose said, ḥallah which is ṭevel and a deadly sin he puts aside and does not take its value from the tribe since the burden of proof is on the claimant⁷⁰There is no problem whatsoever; the same rules apply in both cases. The Cohen’s share in a profanely slaughtered animal is profane; therefore, all rules of civil claims apply. Ḥallah is separated because of religious scruples; no money can be collected since the proselyte cannot prove that he is not obligated..

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Poprzedni werset Cały rozdział Następny werset