Talmud do Berachot 3:1

מִי שֶׁמֵּתוֹ מוּטָל לְפָנָיו, פָּטוּר מִקְּרִיאַת שְׁמַע, מִן הַתְּפִלָּה וּמִן הַתְּפִלִּין. נוֹשְׂאֵי הַמִּטָּה וְחִלּוּפֵיהֶן וְחִלּוּפֵי חִלּוּפֵיהֶן, אֶת שֶׁלִּפְנֵי הַמִּטָּה וְאֶת שֶׁלְּאַחַר הַמִּטָּה, אֶת שֶׁלַּמִּטָּה צֹרֶךְ בָּהֶן פְּטוּרִים, וְאֶת שֶׁאֵין לַמִּטָּה צֹרֶךְ בָּהֶן חַיָּבִין. אֵלּוּ וָאֵלּוּ פְּטוּרִים מִן הַתְּפִלָּה:

Ktoś, kogo zmarły [(jeden z jego krewnych, którego jest zobowiązany opłakiwać, a którego jest obowiązany pochować)] leży przed nim, jest zwolniony z recytowania Szemy [zajęty micwą], od tefillah iz tefiliny. Co do nosicieli kuwety, ich zastępców, [jest to praktyka naprzemiennych, wszyscy chcą uczestniczyć w micwie] i zastępców tych ostatnich, tych przed noszami [tych, którzy mają ją nosić, kiedy do nich dotrze] i tych z tyłu to [to znaczy zarówno ci przed nim, jak i za nim]—ci, których usługi są wymagane [do przenoszenia śmieci], są zwolnieni; i ci, których usługi nie są wymagane [np. ci, którzy idą tylko towarzyszyć zmarłemu, aby go uczcić] są zobowiązani. I obaj są zwolnieni z tefillah [nie jest to nakazane przez Pismo Święte, jak jest to recytacja Szema. Niektórzy twierdzą, że wymaga większej koncentracji.]

Jerusalem Talmud Nazir

What is a corpse of obligation? Anyone for whom he shouts and nobody comes²⁵In the Babli (43b, Yebamot 89b, Erubin 17b): “Anyone who has nobody to bury him; if he calls and others answer him it is not a corpse of obligation.” The Yerushalmi version is in Śemaḥot 4:29.. If the villagers come, he refrains²⁶Cohen or nazir refrain from defiling themselves.. How many? For the carriers of the bier, their replacements, and the replacements of their replacements²⁷In Śemaḥot 4:30: Carriers of the bier and grave diggers.. If he is not needed; but if he is needed, it is different²⁸If the dead cannot have a decent burial without the help of nazir or Cohen, the latter have to defile themselves.. If [the deceased] is not recognized²⁹If the deceased is not recognized by the locals; if he is recognized the nazir or Cohen is precluded from defiling himself.. But if he is recognized, it is different. If it is not according to his honor; but if it is according to his honor, it is different³⁰This is the introduction to the following paragraphs. If the prestige of the deceased is so great that priests have to defile themselve for his burial, it is obvious that the nazir or Cohen who stumbles on his body also has to defile himself.. For the Patriarch it is his honor.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Jerusalem Talmud Sukkah

HALAKHAH: Rebbi Ḥiyya stated: Disqualified space disqualifies in three hand-breadths; disqualified roofing disqualifies in four cubits. Rebbi Yose said, we have stated both. “Disqualified space disqualifies in three hand-breadths,” as we have stated: “If the roofing is three hand-breadths distant from the walls it is disqualified¹⁹²The sukkah is disqualified if along any wall the roofing is not within 3 horizontal hand-breadths..” “Disqualified roofing disqualifies in four cubits,” as we have stated: “If a house partially collapsed and he thatched over it, it is disqualified if from the walls to the thatching it is four cubits²⁰⁰As was stated earlier, a solid roof adjacent or connected to the walls is considered part of the wall, not of the roof. But this is accepted only up to a distance of 4 cubits from the nearest wall. Empty space is acceptable only up to 3 hand-breadths, disqualified material up to 4 cubits..” Therefore less is qualified. May one sleep under that? Rebbi Isaac ben Elyashiv answered: pourable mud completes a miqweh but one may not immerse in it, here also it completes the sukkah but one may not sleep under it²⁰⁴The answer is to a question asked not here but in Berakhot7:1 (Notes 19–29) about the interconnection between rules referring to distinct domains. A miqweh can be used to remove impurities only if it contains 40 se`ah of water, about 135 gallons. If there is not enough clear water, the required volume can be obtained by adding mud which is so moist that it can be poured from a bucket (Mishnah Miqwaot7:1.) R. Eliezer forbids to immerse oneself in mud (Mishnah Miqwaot2:10) but R. Joshua permits. The argument has to be rejected here since R. Joshua will agree that disqualified roofing adjacent to a wall is considered wall, not roofing. Babli 19a.. Ḥizqiah said, because it looks like a bent wall²⁰⁵In his opinion the ruling is a later rabbinic one based on an explicit argument.. Rebbi Hoshaia stated, because it looks like a bent wall. Rebbi Abba, Rebbi Ḥiyya in the name of Rebbi Joḥanan, because it looks like a bent wall. Rebbi Ze`ira, Rebbi Yasa in the name of Cahana, because it looks like a bent wall. Rebbi Jonah said to Rebbi Yose, why do we not say, because disqualified roofing only disqualifies in four cubits²⁰⁶In his opinion, this belongs to the traditional rules of sukkah, predating any rabbinic establishment.?

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Cały rozdział Następny werset