Talmud do Bechorot 1:1

“Rebbi Jehudah permits damaged ones.” Rebbi Jehudah said this only for a damaged one which cannot be healed⁹²To ever work again.. They told him, may they not bring a male to her, she is fertilized and gives birth? He said to them, I also said this only about a male damaged one which cannot be healed. They told him, may they not bring a female to him, he fertilizes her and she gives birth? Rav Abun in the name of the rabbis there: This implies that one is forbidden to provide them with semen⁹³Since the argument of the rabbis has nothing to do with Sabbath prohibitions.
The Babli, Avodah zarah 16a and Bekhorot2b, disagrees and reports that R. Jehudah denies that a disabled cow will accept a male.. There⁹⁴Mishnah Bekhorot 1:1., we have stated: “If somebody buys a Non-Jew’s donkey fetus or who sells one to him even though he is not authorized, or one who enters into partnership, or accepts from him as contractor, or lets it in contract, is not liable for firstling.” Rebbi Haggai asked before Rebbi Yose, does this⁹⁵The note that one is not authorized to sell a pregnant animal to a Gentile. not imply that one is forbidden to provide them with (slaves) [fetuses]⁹⁶The word עבדים “slaves” in the Leiden ms. is a scribal error for עוּבָּרִין “fetuses” in G and Avodah zarah.? He said to them, Rebbi Abun in the name of the rabbis there already preceded you, since Rebbi Abun said in the name of the rabbis there, this implies that one is forbidden to provide them with semen.

“Rebbi Jehudah permits damaged ones.” Rebbi Jehudah said this only for a damaged one which cannot be healed¹⁸⁴To ever work again.. They told him, may he not bring a male to it, he fertilizes it and it gives birth? He said to them, I also said this only about a male (horse) [damaged one]¹⁸⁵The text in parentheses is from the text here, the (correct) one in brackets from Pesaḥim. which cannot be healed. They told him, may he not bring a female to him, she is fertilized by him and gives birth? Rav Abin in the name of the rabbis there: This implies that one is forbidden to provide them with fetuses¹⁸⁶Since the argument of the rabbis has nothing to do with Sabbath prohibitions. The Babli, 16a and Bekhorot2b, disagrees and reports that R. Jehudah denies that a disabled cow will accept a male.. There¹⁸⁷Mishnah Bekhorot1:1., we have stated: “If somebody buys a Non-Jew’s donkey fetus or who sells one to him even though he is not authorized, or one who enters into partnership, or accepts from him as contractor, or lets it in contract, is not liable for firstling.” Rebbi Ḥaggai asked before Rebbi Yose, does this¹⁸⁸The note that one is not authorized to sell a pregnant animal to a Gentile. not imply that one is forbidden to provide them with fetuses? He said to them, Rebbi Abin in the name of the rabbis there already preceded you: This implies that one is forbidden to provide them with fetuses.

HALAKHAH: “One does not sell to them anything connected to the ground,” etc. Rebbi Abun bar Ḥiyya asked: Is there also a disagreement about large cattle? May one sell for the purpose of slaughter? It was found stated: Also large cattle is in dispute; Rebbi Jehudah says, he may sell for the purpose of slaughtering²¹⁷Babli 20a. This is not dependent on the Land; it applies everywhere. The Babli defines R. Jehudah’s adversary as R. Meïr..