Mędrcy zezwolili na cztery śluby (bez rozgrzeszenia): śluby sumienia, śluby przesady, śluby nieświadomości, ślubowania przymusu. „Śluby pilnych”: Jak to? Gdyby ktoś coś sprzedawał i powiedział: „Konam, jeśli sprzedam ci to za mniej niż sela” [tj. Ten bochenek jest dla mnie konamem, jeśli sprzedam ci go za mniej niż sela. Sela to cztery dinary], a drugi powiedział: „Konam, że nie dam ci więcej niż szekla” [pół-sela], obaj zgadzają się na trzy dinary [i nie zamierzali formalnego ślubowania; ale sprzedający „ślubował”, aby „pobudzić” kupującego do zapłacenia więcej, a także kupujący, aby skłonił sprzedawcę do przyjęcia mniej, z tego powodu nie jest to prawdziwy ślub. I chociaż „myśli serca nie mają znaczenia”, tutaj, gdzie jest oczywiste, że taki jest ich zamiar, jest to praktyka kupujących i sprzedających, my bawimy „myśli serca”. R. Eliezer ur. Yaakov mówi: Również ten, który chce pokazać swojemu przyjacielowi, żeby z nim jadł. [Gemara wyjaśnia, że czegoś tu brakuje i że to ma na myśli: Jeśli ktoś pragnie, aby jego przyjaciel jadł z nim, nagabywał go i składał mu śluby, to (także) jest (w kategorii) „ślubami pilni ”. A jeśli ktoś chce, aby jego ślubów na cały rok nie „składał”, powinien powstać w Rosz ha-Szana i] powiedzieć: „Niech każdy ślub, który złożę, będzie nieważny”. [Nie musi to koniecznie robić w Rosz ha-Szana, ale to samo dzieje się, kiedy tylko zechce i przez którykolwiek okres czasu, który wyznaczy], o ile jest świadomy [warunku (że przysięga nie „przyjmuje”)] w czas ślubu [i chce, aby warunek był spełniony. Tylko wtedy ślub jest nieważny. Ale jeśli nie był świadomy stanu, w jakim złożył ślub lub zaraz potem, ślub „składa”. I jest rzeczą oczywistą, że jeśli był świadomy stanu, w którym złożył ślubowanie i pragnął, aby warunek był nieważny i że ślub „przyjmuje”, „przyjmuje”. Pod tym względem prawa dotyczące przysięgi i ślubowania są podobne. Halacha jest zgodna z R. Eliezer b. Yaakov.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Nedarim
ארבעה נדרים (vows intended for urging to buy/sell or while bargaining; vows made dependent upon an impossibility/an exaggeration; vows made in error; vows made on conditions unavoidably fulfilled/under compulsion) – all of them will be explained further on.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim
Introduction
The first four mishnayoth of this chapter deal with vows that use valid language but are nevertheless not valid because the person did not really intend for his vow to be valid. The first category is one who vowed in order to give himself or someone else more incentive to do something. This might be like today if someone says “I bet you a million dollars that I will do a certain thing”. If it doesn’t happen, no one expects the person to actually pay a million dollars. People say these things in order to give themselves more incentive.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Nedarim
קונם שאני פוחת לך מן מסלע – KONAM this loaf of bread if I [pay] less to you than a Sela. And a SELA is four Denarim.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim
Four types of vows the Sages have invalidated: Vows of incentive, vows of exaggeration, vows in error, and vows [broken] under pressure. The first section of the mishnah lists those vows which are not valid. The mishnah and the following mishnayoth will now bring examples of each.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Nedarim
על השקל – it is one-half of a SELA.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim
Vows of incentive how so? If one was selling an article and said, “Konam that I will not reduce below a sela”; and the other replied, “Konam that I will not add above a shekel” both of them want [a price] of three denarii. In this scenario both the buyer and the seller make vows that they will not budge in their prices. One says he will not go above a shekel (two denarii) and the other says he won’t go below a sela (four denarii). Since their intention was for a price of three denarii, they may agree to that price.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Nedarim
שניהם רוצים בשלשה דינרים – but it was not in their hearts for the sake of a vow, but rather, the seller vowed to urge/encourage the purchaser that he should increase they money, and similarly, the purchaser, in order that the seller should lessen the cost of the purchase, therefore, it was not a vow. But even though that matters that are in the heart are not matters, where a matter can be proven like here, for such is the manner of all sellers and purchasers to do this, we follow after the things that are in the heart.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Nedarim
Rabbi Eliezer ben Jacob says: Also one who wishes to subject his friend to a vow to eat with him, may say: “Every vow which I may make in the future shall be void”, providing that he remembers this at the time of the vow. Rabbi Eliezer ben Jacob says that one who wants to get his friend to eat at his place, and vows that if his friend does not do so all of his food will be forbidden to him, should say beforehand that all of his vows that he takes in the future shall be invalid, and then he need not keep his vow. However, when he makes the vow, he must remember that he made the original stipulation that his vows would not be valid. The above explanation of Rabbi Eliezer ben Jacob’s statement is according to the words in our mishnah, where it seems as if he is stating one halakhah. However, the Talmud explains that Rabbi Eliezer ben Jacob actually says two things. First of all, a vow taken to get another person to eat at one’s place, is a vow of incentive, and therefore need not be kept. Second, a person may state that all future vows will be invalid, and as long as he remembers this statement when he vows in the future, his vows will be invalid. By the way, the latter statement is one of the sources of the practice to nullify future vows at Kol Nidre on Yom Kippur.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Nedarim
ר"א בן יעקב אומר אף כל הרוצה להדיר את חבירו כו' – The Gemara (Tractate Nedarim 23b) that our Mishnah is deficient and should be read as follows: A person who wants that his fellow should eat with him but refuses him and forces him to take a vow, it is the vow intended for urging to buy/sell. And the person that wants that he will not vows will not be fulfilled all year will stand up on Rosh Hashanah and state, “every vow that I will someday make is nullified.” And that he will stand up on Rosh Hashanah is not exact, but rather, the same law applies at every time that he wishes and for every time that he establishes.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Nedarim
ובלבד שיהיה זכור – from the condition at the time of the vow, and his mind/intention is upon the condition that it will be fulfilled, then the vow is nullified. But if he is not reminded of the condition at the time of the vow and not at an interval equivalent to the time of speaking (i.e., the amount of time it takes to say in Hebrew, “Greetings to you, my teacher and rabbi”), from the time that he made the vow, the vow exists/endures. But it is not necessary to state that if he is reminded from the condition at the time of the vow and it is his intention that the condition will be nullified and vow existent, for it is clear that the vow exists. But the laws of oaths and vows are equivalent in this law. And the Halakha is according to Rabbi Eliezer ben Yaakov.
