Komentarz do Ketuwot 3:3
נַעֲרָה שֶׁנִּתְאָרְסָה וְנִתְגָּרְשָׁה, רַבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגְּלִילִי אוֹמֵר, אֵין לָהּ קְנָס. רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא אוֹמֵר, יֶשׁ לָהּ קְנָס, וּקְנָסָהּ לְעַצְמָהּ:
Jeśli dziewczyna była zaręczona i rozwiedziona, R. Yossi Haglili mówi, że nie otrzymuje knassa [jest napisane (Księga Powtórzonego Prawa 22:28): „kto nie był zaręczony”; ale jeśli była kiedyś zaręczona, to już nie otrzymuje knassa.] R. Akiwa mówi: Otrzymuje knass, a jej knass należy do niej, [bo wyjaśniamy: „kto nie był zaręczony…” (wtedy otrzyma się knass ) do jej ojca, (co sugeruje, że) jeśli została zaręczona, to należy do niej. Halacha jest zgodna z R. Akivą.]
Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot
רבי יוסי הגלילי אומר אין לה קנס – as the Biblical verse states (Deuteronomy 22:28): “[If a man comes upon a virgin] who is not engaged [and seizes her and lies with her, and they are discovered],” but if she is engaged one time, furthermore, there is no indemnity.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Ketubot
Introduction
In the chapter that describes rape in Deuteronomy the Torah refers to a “young girl, a virgin who has not been betrothed”. As we stated above, the rabbis understand that this verse means that the laws of paying the fine are limited to a “young girl” that is a girl between the ages of 12 and 12 ½ and a virgin. Our mishnah discusses the meaning of the phrase “who has not been betrothed”.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Ketubot
רבי עקיבא אומר יש לה קנס וקנסה לעצמה – since we expound upon “who is not engaged” (Deuteronomy 22:28) to her father, but she is engaged to herself, and the Halakha is according to Rabbi Akiva.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Ketubot
A girl who was betrothed and then divorced Rabbi Yose the Galilean says: she does not receive a fine. Rabbi Akiva says: she receives the fine and the fine belongs to her. In the case in this mishnah, a girl was betrothed and then either widowed or divorced, and then she was raped. The question is does she receive a fine?. Note that if she was betrothed but not divorced or widowed and someone raped her, he would be liable for the death penalty for having committed adultery (she would of course not be liable since she did not willingly commit any crime). In this case, since he is liable for the death penalty, he does not pay a fine. According to Rabbi Yose the Galilean since the Torah states, “who has not been betrothed” the rapist in this case does not pay the fine. Rabbi Akiva reads the phrase “who has not been betrothed” to be a stipulation for when the father receives the fine. If she has never been betrothed, then her father receives a fine. If she has been betrothed, but she is still a virgin, for instance she was divorced or widowed before full marriage, the rapist is liable to pay a fine and he pays it directly to her.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy