Komentarz do Kelim 2:6
גִּסְטְרָא שֶׁנִּמְצֵאת בַּכִּבְשָׁן, עַד שֶׁלֹּא נִגְמְרָה מְלַאכְתָּהּ, טְהוֹרָה. מִשֶּׁנִּגְמְרָה מְלַאכְתָּהּ, טְמֵאָה. טִיטְרוֹס, רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר בַּר צָדוֹק מְטַהֵר. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי מְטַמֵּא, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא כְמוֹצִיא פְרוּטוֹת:
Jeśli uszkodzony słoik został znaleziony w piecu przed ukończeniem jego produkcji, nie jest on podatny na rytualne zanieczyszczenie; ale po jego zakończeniu jest podatny. Rabin spryskiwacza Eliezer ben Sadok stwierdza, że jest niewrażliwy na nieczystość, ale rabin Yose stwierdza, że jest on podatny, ponieważ wypuszcza ciecz tylko w kroplach.
Bartenura on Mishnah Kelim
גסטרא (a defective vessel – handles broken off or cracked) – fragments/broken earthenware vessels. And the thing divided into two, it is called גיסטרא /defective vessel (see Tractate Kelim, Chapter 4, Mishnah 3 for a definition: כל שנטלו אזניה/when its handles are split/broken off. And the language of גיסטרא is divided into two.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Kelim
A damaged jar found in a furnace: Before its manufacture was complete it is not susceptible to impurity, But if after its manufacture was complete it is susceptible. A damaged jar is one that is not complete, and is considered damaged even if only its handles have been removed. Mishnah 4:3 will discuss the damaged jar. If it is found in the furnace before its manufacturing process was complete, then it cannot become impure. In other words, if it was broken before it ever became a complete vessel, then it is pure, even though it has a receptacle. However, if it is first forged in the oven thereby completing its manufacturing, and then it breaks, since it does have a receptacle it is susceptible to impurity. In other words, once something is a finished vessel, it can receive impurity so long as it has a receptacle.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kelim
שנמצאת בכבשן – and we don’t know if it was broken prior to its being baked in the kiln/furnace and at the time when its manufacture was complete it did not have the status of a utensil/vessel upon it and not further on, it does defile because it is a defective vessel, or afterwards it was broken and defiles. But how do we verify the matter? We see if its shards are equivalent and its inside grows red, it is known that its manufacture was completed [first] and afterwards it became broken, and it defiles, for it was made to be a receptacle, for it is the manner to place a defective vessel underneath the jug/arched, pouched vessel to receive the liquid that drips from it.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
English Explanation of Mishnah Kelim
A sprinkler: Rabbi Eliezer bar Zadok holds it is not susceptible to impurity; But Rabbi Yose holds it to be susceptible because it lets the liquid out in drops only. The "sprinkler" referred to here was a vessel with one hole above and many holes below. When one would cover the top hole with his finger, the water would not sprinkle out below. According to Rabbi Eliezer bar Zadok, such a vessel is not considered a receptacle and therefore is not susceptible to impurity. Rabbi Yose holds that it is susceptible because it only lets out small drops. However, if it lets the liquid out faster, then it is not susceptible to impurity.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kelim
טיטרוס (a perforated vessel, strainer, sprinkler) – a vessel which is perforated from below with many thin holes like the size of the hole of a needle and from above one hole like the size of a reed, that is a spindle that the women spin on, and when they fill it with water and a person places his finger in the hole from above so that the wind will not reach it no drop of water goes out from the small holes from below, but when he removes his finger, the water comes out.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kelim
ר' אלעזר בר צדוק מטהר – because it is perforated where the liquid enters.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Bartenura on Mishnah Kelim
ורבי יוסי מטמא – for this is the manner of how it is used, and it is considered a receptacle since the waters stand through the placing of the finger, but even without the placing of the finger, the water doesn’t leave other than like removing coins little by little, drop after drop., and because of this, it is not considered perforated like when brings in liquid to be purified through this And the Halakha is according to Rabbi Yossi.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy